Division 1 - Week 4 Selections

[avongirl]

 

[Wtrylika]

Newcastle - Brentford, Over 2.5, 1.67

Heidenheim - Werder, Over 2.5, 1.67

Darmstadt - Mgladbach, Over 2.5, 1.73

Treble, 50 pts

 

[Heisenberg68]

Double £50
 

Paris @1,44

Lens @1,50

[Dramfech]

Everton - Arsenal  (Over 2.5) @1.67

Sevilla - Las Palmas (Sevilla) @1.60

15 points double

[Data]

Wolves v Liverpool		(2)		1.40
Everton v Arsenal		(2)		1.50
		£17		double

[nawoo]

Spurs v Shef Utd - Over @ 1.5

Barcelona v Betis  - Over @ 1.57

Double - 15pts

[bymatrix]

Rennes vs Lille to draw @ 3.60

Valencia vs Ath Madrid to draw @ 2.40

 

£5 Double       

[vangovin]

Over 2.5

Swindon 1.70

Mainz 1.73

10 points double

thanks

[Chris P]

£12.50 DOUBLE

GILLINGHAM @ 1.85

PRESTON @ 2.00

 

 

[Craig bluenose]

Port Vale x 3.60

Lincoln x 3.60

Swindon x 3.70

10pts Treble

[Skittle]

WHU v Man City  2  @ 1.44.

Spurs v Sheff Utd  1  @ 1.25.

Everton v Arsenal  2  @  1.50.

£14.08 Treble.

[stuboy43]

£10 win treble

Brighton to beat Man Utd @ 2.87

Swindon to beat Walsall @ 1.95

Bochum v Frankfurt O2.5 Gls @ 1.70

 

 

 

[Xcout]

Monaco @ 1.85
Napoili @ 1.65

£29.44 double please

[1945harry]

Notts Forest (1) @ 2.25

Blackburn (1) @ 2.5

Cardiff (1) @ 2.5

£10 Treble.

[Fader]

@avongirl selections for @Tiffy below via fb 

Tottenham 1
Brighton 1
Liverpool V Wolves O2. 5
£10 Treble please

thanks 

[andellio]

 £15 Single Wolves v Liverpool X @ 5,00 

[Fader]

Brighton (2) 2.87
N.Forest (1) 2.25

£15 double please 

[thebestthere]

St Johnstone (1)

10pts single

[Bedlam]

Fulham v Luton (1) @ 1.65

Forest v Burnley (1) @ 2.25

£10 double please.

[harry_rag]

25 point treble:

Fulham (1) 1.65 and >2.5 goals at Villa 1.85 and Newcastle 1.67

[avongirl]

On 9/16/2023 at 11:55 AM, Fader said:

@avongirl selections for @Tiffy below via fb 

Tottenham 1
Brighton 1
Liverpool V Wolves O2. 5
£10 Treble please

thanks 

@Fader @Tiffy is that exactly as it was sent?   Brighton were the away team (Man U home) and won. I suspect it was intended as Brighton to win as it wouldn't be the normal way to set it out quoting only the away team for a home win (1). That's why it is helpful to have the odds quoted within the selection for clarity.

[Fader]

11 hours ago, avongirl said:

@Fader @Tiffy is that exactly as it was sent?   Brighton were the away team (Man U home) and won. I suspect it was intended as Brighton to win as it wouldn't be the normal way to set it out quoting only the away team for a home win (1). That's why it is helpful to have the odds quoted within the selection for clarity.

I copy and pasted exactly how it was.

in future, if I get them via FB, then I will let them know. You're free to go however you like with this. i.e, if it's void, winner, or loser.

@Tiffy

Thanks

 

[avongirl]

@Tiffy after consideration I'm going to take the bet as a double on your other 2 selections and disregard the Brighton (1) selection as it's not fully clear on the intention.  Your instruction is for home win (1) which lost on the Man U v Brighton game, but without knowing the odds you took it's possible you have misquoted the team or the instruction, so in fairness I will void the selection so it doesn't taint your whole bet. 

Settled as winning double at 1.25 x 1.50.

[Fader]

6 hours ago, avongirl said:

@Tiffy after consideration I'm going to take the bet as a double on your other 2 selections and disregard the Brighton (1) selection as it's not fully clear on the intention.  Your instruction is for home win (1) which lost on the Man U v Brighton game, but without knowing the odds you took it's possible you have misquoted the team or the instruction, so in fairness I will void the selection so it doesn't taint your whole bet. 

Settled as winning double at 1.25 x 1.50.

I should have confirmed this as I always do the correct format myself. Think that's fair enough.