Leaderboard

I think I posted one at 10/11 this time round but generally I prefer to try and find something with a real chance 6/4 to 7/2. I did put up a 20/1 shot that won but only because I had it on my tracker. Maybe I am old fashioned but when I see pro tipsters in the media writing a full page article telling me some long odds on shot will win a novice chase I cringe. For me it's the same on here when I see someone constantly putting up the shortest priced horse they can find in an effort to manipulating the game/competition. Anyway the powers that be seem to think that's ok so I will say no more Happy punting all

I had to smile - most times I post an odds on selection it loses - or fails to race, as happened on Saturday. Posting odds on again is something I promise not to do every time I do 😂

13.30 Tramore Blossom De Mai 40/1 b365

12-50 sedge deep charm 10/1 365 win only

Won't be able to get a bet for this Saturday, as on a week's holiday to the Canary Islands. Stolen Silver in 2.50 Newbury at 18/1 (William Hill) Empire Steel in 3.05 Newcastle at 10/1 (PP) 2 x singles Each way double

Age – 11 of the last 12 winners were aged between 6 & 8Price – 4 of the last 12 winners were favourites, 5/12 winners were in the top 3 in the bettingWeight – 10 of the last 12 winners carried 11st 4lbs or lessLast Run – 6 of the last 12 winners won on their last run before the Coral Gold Cup, 10/12 winners finished 3rd or higher on their last run, 10/12 winners ran within the last 57 daysPrevious Course Form – 5/12 winners had at least 1 previous run at Newbury, 5/12 winners had at least 1 previous win at NewburyPrevious Distance Form – 11/12 winners had at least 4 previous runs over 24 furlongs or further, 10/12 had at least 1 previous wins over 24 furlongs or furtherPrevious Chase Form – 11/12 winners had at least 6 previous chase runs, 12/12 winners had at least 2 previous chase winsRating – 10/12 winners were rated 146 or higherGraded Wins – 5/12 winners had at least 1 previous win in a grade 1-3 raceSeason Form – 10/12 winners had at least 1 run that season, 5/12 winners had at least 1 win that season

I've done the prelim pass on computer and it's made a shortlist of 7 horses .....I can't do full pass until about Thurs Fri to narrow it further ..but it's 23 down to like 7 ...I'll be surprised if the winner isn't on this shortlist ... Ahoy senior Stolen silver Midnight river Mahler mission Monbeg genius Our power Sail away 🤔🤔

DEEP CHARM-----12.50---SEDGEFIELD ---9/1---BET365

Was going to back Immobile at 4/1 but, obviously, didn't with him not starting. Best price was with Sky Bet so wouldn't have been void if he didn't start. Right thing to do but still irritating that he comes on and scores!

tonight I have gone for Haaland and Mbappe. Haaland has scored first in his last 4 / 5 matches. I wonder if you blindly bet him to score first in each game would you make or lose money over a season? Maybe something to consider for 2024 / 2025 season!

+£3.20

Aristobulus 1540 hrs Swell 12/1 B365

Wouldn’t think that even he went 4-0 up tbh lol

Factually incorrect to refer to that as abuse. The rules of the competition are what they are and betting again when you can't be caught would be daft. You've got the job done early and obliterated the field. Whilst the competition will never be entirely true to real life (there are rules around minimum number of selections etc.) a rule that effectively compels you to bet every day rather than exercise selectivity and judgement would be a bad one. No one expects the clubhouse leader with an unassailable lead to go out and play another couple of holes. This has been covered before and the overriding consensus was "if it ain't broke". Those people who don't like the "most winners" angle don't like it full stop. Apply a "no odds on" rule (again contrary to the real world where people are free to back or tip at whatever price they choose) and they'll just moan about how anyone can post a succession of even money shots and that's not "real punting". If "anyone" can hit a 69% strike rate with a 38.8% ROI month in, month out by backing odds on shots then anyone who doesn't do so is frankly an idiot and not much of a punter to be leaving that sort of profit in the bookies' satchels. Well there's plenty of scope to start or add to discussions in the daily threads etc. What gets me is someone who chooses to contribute little beyond entering a free competition (that they can't apparently even win a prize in) grumbling about the way said competition is run.

McGill looking good early doors against Ronnie, think you might have called that one correctly.

I voiced my opinion to you recently about disallowing any selections that are odds on Having won the KO Cup in the past I never got paid because in my country we are not allowed a paypal account So I am in it just for the fun so please don't see this as sour grapes it is not.. If I finish runner up my prize I would like to go to the 3rd guy whoever that might be. First off: The way the competition is set up it is open to abuse. Like the current leader can now just sit there make no selection without penalty and take the prize? That could easily be sorted by saying no selection is a loser Constantly sticking up 4/11 and 4/9 shots is as much to do with tipping as flying in the air. IMVHO any selection that is odds on at time of selection should be deemed a loser. If it goes odds on after selected that would be acceptable. The way things stand a player needs a couple of 3/1 winners and then put in the shortest priced horse he/she can find and it's almost odds on they will scoop a prize In the meantime congratulations to the winner he never made up the rules so good on him. What gets me is this is not a site known for discussing racing. Take last years Champion Hurdle for example.........8 replies If it were a discussion forum there would be 8 replies or more a week. It is basically a place for would be tipsters and if putting up 1/3 shots is tipping I am a Dutchman.

Right back at you 👍 Good luck in this competition 🙂

Most winners Looks like @CS 333 is the winner

Abedallah Shelbayh to beat Luca Van Assche at 2.75 with William Hill I'm playing this for the odds. Nothing is expected from Shelbayh, but he's "the local guy", and Van Assche was awful last time out, losing 2-6 0-6 against Fery. No reason to have Shelbayh at 2.75 here imo, I'd be 2.25.

Had £28 c/o going into last @Zilzalian will send bank details 💰😂😂

Fellow Sky Blues Fan, I salute you!🙋‍♂️

Congrats to @Johnrobertson Please PM me your PayPal details. You win the £250 1st prize. Commiserations for the 3 other players. More than welcome to continue in the Consolation. New LMS to kick off after the International break.

Hi Mikey, Welcome to the best sports forum around!! In answer to your question about odds for the next day you'll usually find bet365 are the first firm to issue odds for the next day at between 4 o'clock and 5 o'clock although William Hill do issue a few select races at the 48 hour stage so its worth watching out for them as well. At The Races forum is the place to find everything horse racing related whilst there's plenty of other forums covering other sports and even poker. The Brigadier

Bonkers !