Torque

I’d put everything you own on Brentford winning this one. Maybe go for a 2-1 score line? Janelt to score first is a good shout too

Exactly like I said before, it's up to you and as long as you can afford the loss, it's fine. Life is short, just do what you like and you're not in a life threatening or financial crisis after betting for numerous years. Go for it. Support ??

Most likely with bets like above but its been a good ride so far

another account......endless...... 
dangerous and not worth the risk at those odds in my opinion but that's waggy's way of betting and his own choice.
Glad it turned out well. 

1673 result: 3rd. Lost £80
Profit to date £987.17
Another disgraceful reaction from BrandNew once again. This guy has spread his vitriol under various names and is against everything that this site stands for.
I need these childish reactions like a hole in the head. 

Oh, darn, it's actually four, I somehow managed to count in the three from this week as well!

Another weekend of football after an International break. WARNING! Minefield Ahead.

Players come back from these International breaks, with no momentum. It seems like they are doing a lot other than playing football. Most look sluggish, and these post-international break games, seem to be played at a snails pace. I simply don't like over 2.5 goal bets in these games, as goals in general tend to dry up.

Will a rejuvenated Pep fire City up again? Has Everton's bubble burst? Will Solksjaer stop playing overly defensive formations against weak teams? Let's see what's on the menu the EPL weekend.

The early Saturday kickoff is between Newcastle and Chelsea. For me a no contest, Chelsea win.
It's a perfect matchup for them. A semi open game where top players will dominate good players. Not much value in the 5 to 10 odds for a Chelsea win but it's OK.
I feel that the Over 2.5 is risky, because Chelsea are getting better defensively every week. They will get it together and they will click, especially with a new, solid goalkeeper.

I wouldn't go reaching for things here, and at odds of  1.55+ for the away win are decent. Chelsea have too many guns here, the squad is full of quality!
 
Tottenham v Man City
For me a very tough game to call. I expect a similar kind of result to the Man CIty / Liverpool game. Gotta be wary of Mourinho in these big games. He always goes cautious and never lets the dogs out. Under pressure people revert to type, and his way in these big games in defend, and stop the opponent. I see huffing and puffing but not many goals here. City look strangely flat to me. David Silva is a huge miss and is not replaceable.  I think Tottenham at odds of 3.9 for the home win are decent value here.

I don't get why Man City are odds on to win at spurs.  Spurs have done well against city in recent meetings in both the PL and CL, and won this fixture 2-0 last season.  City have fitness doubts over Aguero and possibly Sterling, and while you still have to respect them, they will certainly be weaker if one or both of them aren't able to play. 
It's hard to know if players are fully fit after the international break, but as far as I know Spurs have no major injury problems, other than Doherty missing through COVID.  That means Aurier starting which is a bit of a worry, especially if Sterling is playing, but even so, spurs at odds over 4 seems way too high.  Of course i'm biased, but for betting I try and keep all that to one side.  For me both teams should be much closer to each other in the betting, so spurs +1 is a pick i'm pretty confident in.  I'll also have a small bit on spurs to win outright, as I really don't see why City are so heavily favoured.
 
 

medvedev plays really well, I've seen him play. I also saw him very feverish in Paris when his tennis is bad. In front of Nadal, if it doesn't go as he wants, he can play badly. I find him mentally fragile. 
But his tennis level is very good. 

Dominic Thiem to beat Novak Djokovic at 2.32 with Pinnacle
Novak Djokovic covered the -3.5 handicap against Zverev, but he's going to face a much harder task against Thiem. Thiem has played consistently well when it mattered so far and it's not tough to see that he was saving himself when he was facing Rublev yesterday. I get why Djokovic is the favorite here, but I'd honestly take everything above 2.00 on Thiem. He's been the better player and Djokovic hasn't played like the world's number one for quite some time now, so no reason to have him as such a big fav imo.

totally agree on that.
 
Tricky games today- thiem rublev feels like a trap game. Rublev was awful against Nadal but got his rhythm against tsitsipas. in the last meeting in Vienna they went toe to toe until thiems w.o. Thiem already advanced (last year he lost in the exact same situation) and for rublev it is a must win.
 
Nada vs Tsitsipas i consider taken the over 22,5.. i even can see that going into a 3rd set. Tsitsipas likes the court in London and he gave thiem (who is my favourite at this point to win the tournament) a tough match. with his solid serve this should be a tight contest.

Yes, agree.  Speaking about motivation, definitely more on Rublev side and even DT was motivated, Rublev also knew how to win this match-up.  Therefore the chance of Rublev winning I reckon much higher than the odds suggest.

I think the motivation in this match solely rests on Rublev's shoulders. Thiem has qualified and can decide to do anything as we have seen from past experiences in round robin matches. And this idea of Rublev already being on vacation is really a figure of speech for all intents and purposes. On the head to head count, pride or financial reward, Rublev still has a lot to play for. Rublev at least wins a set and possibly more here.

Novak Djokovic (-3.5) to beat Alexander Zverev at 1.97 with Pinnacle
I think that we can all agree that Djokovic was poor against Medvedev. Once he went a break down, he almost gave up, making tons of unforced errors and just going through the motions. This leaves him in a situation in which he actually needs to try against Zverev and I think that Zverev is the right opponent for him to get back. Zverev has been erratic so far and he'll give Djokovic plenty of chances if he plays like he did against both Medvedev and Schwartzman. There are stakes in this match and I think that Djokovic will get back to winning ways here more often than not, so I'll take him on the reasonable handicap. At the same time, I don't think that he's the favorite to win the entire thing at this point, both Thiem and Medvedev have looked way better so far.

Rublev to take a set and overs between Rafa and Tsitsipas would be my call.

Rublev to take a set and overs between Rafa and Tsitsipas would be my call.

Rublev to take a set and overs between Rafa and Tsitsipas would be my call.

Bad run for me , but it’s doesn’t matter. The most important is to keep self control and don’t bet more . 
 
after bad run , it’s good run ??

Rublev to take a set and overs between Rafa and Tsitsipas would be my call.

Rublev to take a set and overs between Rafa and Tsitsipas would be my call.

1661-1662 result: Hull won 3-0
Profit to date ££838.99
The price changed because the Hull manager made 11 changes from his Saturday team, which is the opposite to what he said about fielding a strong side. It came good in the end though. 
It takes a very mean minded person to actually want someone to lose money but our resident troll BrandNew wanted that. How bad is that.
For his information there is no plan or endgame just to simply win money if possible. 

Good luck. ? very dangerous to bet such big amounts but as long as you can afford the risk, it's up to you. Hope you'll stay in the black and continue to do so. ??

Hi @avongirl
Can I please request that my winnings go towards the @BillyHills dog fund. Thanks.

@BrandNew Having played tennis as an amateur myself, it really isn't that difficult after a bit of practice. It will become embedded in your muscle memory after a while. Of course, professionals don't want to just hit a tennis serve in play, they want to hit it well, which makes it tougher. You should absolutely not be hitting more than 2 per set though. It's hard to do statistics on this, because you often see players going for huge second serves in certain situations (*40-0 and even *40-15 in some cases), which makes the data skewed.

Cheers, some actual selections would be nice. No offence but I sometimes get a bit fed up of people just posting links to other sites.