Trotter
-
Posts
14,667 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
37
Posts posted by Trotter
-
-
20 points to win - Man City at 1.57
cheers !
-
I think RPR are more useful when it comes to grizzled old handicappers who have run a few dozen times
Years ago when I was concentrating on AW handicaps I used to look at RPR ..... and I was looking to see if there was any pattern in a horse's past form. These were lower grade handicaps full of well experienced horses
So I was looking to see if a horse produced it's best RPRs at one of the AW tracks over the others or at a specific distance or in a specific class of race or in big or small fields........ I was trying to guage whether today's race was likely to see the horse at his best in comparison to what it had done before
As always though ...... this was only one factor amongst several that went in to the race assessment
-
As for today's race what the RPR is saying is that the run of Quasiamart on 5th Nov in their opinion was a 15lb better performance than the run of Dobryn on 13th Jan
That's their assessment of those 2 runs
That's only 1 factor to take into account for today though .... is one of the horses improving rapidly and might leave previous RPRs behind ...... has one of them got much more favourable conditions as to the ground, trip etc today and therefore might do much better than he has in previous runs. Alternatively did one horse have perfect conditions when it earned it's rating but probably won't be suited by todays ground and trip so will probably score lower today
Is one yard in form now but was out of form when the horse earned it's previous rating ........ so the horse might run much better today
etc, etc
-
All form ratings are opinions .... it's somebody's opinion of what the form was worth
I think maybe RPR and Timeform are different .......
I think RPR are trying to put a figure on what each past run is worth in terms of form on a common standard so all past runs by all horses can be directly compared with a figure
I believe Timeform are doing something different ....... saying what they think a horse is capable of in the future, hence all the p and P and squiggles etc. Of course an opinion of past form is built into that
But it all comes down to opinion ........ was that run at Sedgefield two weeks ago worth 130 or 120 ?
It's opinion.
All you can hope for from any ratings is that they use the same criteria today as they did last week and the ratings are consistently formed on the same basis year after year and hence performances are being compared to the same standard all the time
-
11 minutes ago, The Equaliser said:
Very many thanks for your help. Is it possible for you to tell me what the adjusted weights for the RPR is on the flat and, if it is the same for the all weather
yeah, on the flat and AW all the RPRs are adjusted to 10 stones
-
57 minutes ago, The Equaliser said:
RATINGS UNDER SCRUTINY
12.30 Lud Qualismart Top RPR of 134, 10 points clear of nearest rival (Timeform top and 9 points clear). This horse is an odds on favourite (or evens one the Exchanges) to win this race. When you look back in the Racing Post you will see that its last RPR when it got stuck in the mud was 114. The time before that when it ran its most promising race the RPR was 128. I cannot understand why it can jump from 128 (best run) to 134 now?
Just on this point
The RPR for Jumps are weight adjusted to 12 stones .......... so the 128 is what he would have to run to that day if he'd been carrying 12 stones
That day he was carrying 10-12 so 16lbs under 12 stones. So on that day he actually ran 144 but he would have run 128 if he'd been carrying 12 stones
So today at 11 stone 8lbs he's 6 lbs below 12 stones so he gets 6 points added to his RPR of 128 to give 134 ......
If he'd been carrying 12 stones 5lbs today he'd have 5 lbs taken off the 128 and his RPR today would be 123
The RPR for past races is what he would have earned on that day if he'd been carrying 12 stones ...... as this is the same then for all horses in all runs it makes comparing each run of each horse easier because the ratings are adjusted as though they were all carrying the same weight
- MCLARKE and The Equaliser
- 1
- 1
-
Sou 4.00 - Berrhari - win at 7/1 bet365
-
2.50 Ling - Currency Exchange - win at 3/1 PP
-
+44.69
Ling 2.50 - Currency Exchange 11/4 and Cheeky Az 7/2
Ling 3.25 - Zen Dancer 6/4 and Miss Seafire 5/2prices bet365
4 x £5 doubles
-
17 minutes ago, Zilzalian said:
I keep wanting to say isn't all this a bit over the top? Then i sit and think, wait a minute every Saturday i hear all the pundits owners, stable staff, trainers, telling the viewers how much care and love the horses get etc etc the amount of effort that has been put in to counter the loony "ban this cruel sport brigade" and then i think, sorry pal you (Elliott) have pretty much f****d us and the sport you deserve everything you get no matter what punishment they give you.
I agree with that but I also think about all the staff at the yard, the associated businesses in the area like farriers and horse transport firms, vets etc who depend on the yard .......... I'm thinking if he's forced out of the sport then there's a lot of people and their families who are going to lose their income
OK, the disruption might only be short term if someone else takes over and the staff might get other jobs in the industry but it'll be a very difficult period for a lot of families
-
3 hours ago, Trotter said:
Newc 5.30 - Songkran 11/4 (WON 7/2) and Home Before Dusk 4/1
Newc 6.00 - Imperial Command 15/8 (WON 15/8) and Silver Dust 11/2prices bet365
4 x £5 doubles
1st and 2nd in both races !
return 64.69, profit 44.69
+44.69
- MCLARKE, Nigwilliam and LEE-GRAYS
- 3
-
Newc 5.30 - Songkran 11/4 and Home Before Dusk 4/1
Newc 6.00 - Imperial Command 15/8 and Silver Dust 11/2prices bet365
4 x £5 doubles
-
Newc 5.30 - Home Before Dusk - win at 9/2 PP
-
Terrible
The very least we can expect is that these fantastic animals are treated with respect and dignity
- Villa Chris and Torque
- 2
-
4.50 Wolv - Treaty of Dingle - win at 25/1 bet365
-
-
Meanwhile ......... a 300/1 shot has won the grade one Australian Guineas at Flemington Park.
Lunar Fox came into the race with form figures of 6644570
?
-
One of the regulars on Sky Sports Sunday morning racing forum/debate show has lost his job ....... Chris Cook of The Guardian has left the paper after being informed by management that they wished to reduce their racing coverage
- The Equaliser and Striker
- 2
-
+59.63
Ling
12.55 - Intuitive 5/6
2.05 - Lord Riddiford 4/1
2.40 - Father of Jazz 13/8
3.10 - Luckys Dream - Evens
3.43 - Anisoptera 4/1prices bet365
10 x £2 trebles
-
Ling 2.40 - Father of Jazz - win at 13/8 bet365
-
20 points on Frankfurt at 1.83
thanks !
-
5.45 Wolv - Fred - win at 9/2 bet365
-
Sou 7.30 - Lord Oberon - win at 7/4 bet365
-
+79.63
Sou 1.30 - Zapper Cass 11/8 and Doc Sportello 5/2
Sou 2.05 - ornate 10/3 and Tawny Port 15/2prices bet365 bog
4 x £5 doubles
Naps - Friday 5th March
in NAP of the Day Competition
Posted
Ling 2.35 - Prismatic - win at 12/1 bet365