BillyHills Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 What do reckon to this, surely they should have voided the race? Quote Controversy reigned at Yarmouth when it was discovered that the Charlie McBride-trained Mandarin Princess, winner of the opening two-year-old race, was in fact stablemate Millie's Kiss. The mistake was only discovered after the 50-1 outsider had overturned the 4-6 hotpot Fyre Cay on her racecourse debut in the six-furlong novice auction stakes for juveniles. Millie's Kiss, a three-year-old with plenty of racecourse experience, was due to run in the nine-furlong handicap later on the card but was subsequently withdrawn. A report issued by the British Horseracing Authority said: "The stewards held an inquiry to consider the circumstances surrounding the identification of the winner, Mandarin Princess, trained by Philip (Charlie) McBride, which was presented at the sampling unit for routine testing. "The scan identified the horse to be Millie's Kiss, the trainer's other runner in race four. "They interviewed the trainer, the stable groom, the veterinary officer and the equine welfare integrity officer responsible for the sampling unit. "Having heard their evidence they referred the matter to the head office of the British Horseracing Authority and ordered Millie's Kiss to be withdrawn from race four." Despite the wrong horse having won the race, the result is set to stand - for the time being. Stipendiary steward Tony McGlone told At The Races: "As all horses are, they are brought into the stables and they are scanned and are allocated into their boxes. "These two horses, trained by Charlie McBride, were given a box each. "Mr McBride went over to the weighing room to collect the saddle and was slightly delayed collecting it. He rushed over. "The stable girl had taken the horse out of the stables and put it in the saddling boxes. Mr McBride put the saddle on, the horse ran, it won. "We then sent the horse for routine testing as per normal. The integrity officer scanned the horse and found it to be the wrong horse. "We have referred it to the British Horseracing Authority for further consideration. I think the BHA have got 14 days to lodge an objection to the winner. "We'll obviously send a report from here and they will look into the matter." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snug Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 How on earth the trainer would not know one horse from another is beyond me, and shows a serious lack of care and detail. I can get he might have been in a rush before the race, but afterwards??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trotter Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 What I don't get is why one of the experts - other trainers, jockeys, paddock watchers, regular racegoers, - didn't recognise a 3yo amongst the two year olds I mean when you get a huge monster of a 2yo the pundits always say 'it looks like a 3yo' ........ er, so they must be able to tell the difference ! gbettle and Snoopdog 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate53 Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 Definitely should have been voided. The 'winning horse' did not run! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopdog Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 What makes it look worse is the "winning horse" was withdrawn from its designated race. Why? OK, it was a 3yo beating 2yo's but couldn't have been feeling too bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.