Jump to content

Europa League Qualifying > August 28-30


Recommended Posts

Re: Europa League Qualifying > August 28-30

I am not happy with my recent picks - I keep on staying just a little above evens. I obviously have to shorten my picks' date=' but don't according to which criteria[/quote'] What do you mean by 'shorten your picks'? Do you mean have fewer bets?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Europa League Qualifying > August 28-30

I agree with Kojic' date=' RS are underrated here. Kasalica (key fw) is back and over a thousand fans will be with the team. There is no value in favor of Bordeaux, the best hope for Zvezda :hope[/quote'] Strasbourg then Bordeaux, again in the final seconds :@:@:@
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Europa League Qualifying > August 28-30

What do you mean by 'shorten your picks'? Do you mean have fewer bets?
Yes, I mean reducing the number of bets. Or alternatively, I am trying to single out the type of bets which are just inherently more risky (of course, at the same coefficient) and not successful in the long term. I think that those "unders" and "overs" are probably in front of such list. It is just very often that I get the course of the game very well, but some lucky shots/unlucky misses spoil these types of bets. On the other hand, those "to maintain clean sheet" bets have been particularly very successful in the long term. I have to look back in my betting archive, but I think their success rate is more than 80% in my bets. Given that they are usually similarly priced with the unders/overs, I maybe see no sense in using the latter. But not decided yet - have to make more analysis.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Europa League Qualifying > August 28-30

Yes' date=' I mean reducing the number of bets. Or alternatively, I am trying to single out the type of bets which are just inherently more risky (of course, at the same coefficient) and not successful in the long term. I think that those "unders" and "overs" are probably in front of such list. It is just very often that I get the course of the game very well, but some lucky shots/unlucky misses spoil these types of bets. On the other hand, those "to maintain clean sheet" bets have been particularly very successful in the long term. I have to look back in my betting archive, but I think their success rate is more than 80% in my bets. Given that they are usually similarly priced with the unders/overs, I maybe see no sense in using the latter. But not decided yet - have to make more analysis.[/quote'] Do you enter any betting competitions? One useful discipline they normally impose is limiting you to a certain number of bets in the competition period. Personally, I have found this a very useful discipline, as it has forced me to think more about which bets on my list represent the best value. In general, I think most regular punters would improve their returns (or reduce their losses) by having fewer bets than they do. If a punter has, say, 2 bets a weekend, I guess they would do better than if they have 20 - although the bookmakers would probably prefer them to have 20 :lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...