Simeon Borisof
-
Posts
1,595 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Posts posted by Simeon Borisof
-
-
9 hours ago, neilovan said:
I think Djokovic is vulnerable. Realistically he has played 2 rank outsiders. Prizmic is ranked around 175 and Popyrin is 48. The Djoko of old would just win both these matches 3-0. I think age has caught up with him a little, and he has an extra 2 sets in his legs that he didn't need. For me Etcheverry is much better than both Popyrin and Prizmic. He has won both his Aussie Open matches in straight sets.
I went to work in Argentina in the early 2000's and was amazed at how many clay court facilities there were (in Buenos Aires). Lot's of kids hitting balls, facilites for free, coaches provided. As a kid you could play hours a day for no cost. It's a system that produces very solid, strong players. Growing up and playing on clay does that. High levels of fitness, and solid ground strokes (as the ball bounces slower).
For me Djoko is not the greatest player ever, but he is the greatest 'recoverer'. He understands his body, and how to recover properly to 100%. Most of his opponents don't. For me there is no doubt that this recovery is slower now, at his more advanced age. It is less of a factor. A slightly fatigued Djoko at age 36 vs a rock solid 24 year old in the prime of his life... I think this goes to the wire and Etcheverry is worth a punt at 11-1. The handicap +7.5 also looks OK at 1.83
I was super impressed with Arthur Cazaux against Rune. This kid can play. Strong and tall, with a cannon for a serve. Moves very well and has a solid temprament. Rune is tricky, but he swatted him aside. It is a top win against a top 10 opponent. Not sure why he is the underdog against Griekspoor on Sat but I think he wins here.
I watched the Pegula v Burel match, and it was amazing how Burel just wiped her out. Pegula got so frustrated and her body language and mind just crumbled. And it is no fluke. Burel was world junior #1, so she has game, very good technique and the ability to problem solve on court. The only thing that was slighly lacking was physical strength, which will grow as she gets older. I think she wins quite easily against Dodin in the all French affair.
Will continue to back Navarro, and I think she wins against Yastremska. Just on such a winning streak, against an inconsistent opponent. Burel and Navarro as a double for me.
Can't say that 1.80 is tall(cazaux).i consider somebody as tall if he is over 1.95 per say
-
Carter to beat Ronnie @ 3.30 with a local. Ronnie is yet to be tested this tournament withhis opponents all crumbling at some point. He is far from his best while Carter has been on fire since now and i rate his break building better than Ronnie's atthat moment. The h2h doesnt sound good for Carter ofc, but i think that is the perfect opportunity to make it 17:2. A couple of quids on 10:7 @ 17 with a local
-
Ali Carter every day for me. Allen was crap apart from the 147 and the century and could have easily lost 6:1. Carter will have more time to recover and i think he edges this. 2.20 with a local. 6:4 @8.90 with a local.
-
Does somebody want to say it?
-
-
-
Errani could barely walk in the 3rd set. Guess at 36 fatigue is an issue, except Djoko ofc haha
-
You should be a brave man to bet against a woman who has an average % of 1st serve @ 87.
-
Ridiculous odds on Medvedev to beat Alcaraz @ 3.60. Alcaraz beat Zverev mainly because Zverev didn't play all and was tired from the epuc clach with Sinner yesterday and he even took a medical timeout after the 2nd set. Medvedev was fairly solid against Rublev and was never in danger to lose a set or the match. I can see this one being a close battle, maybe a five setter with many long rallies and Medvedev triumphing at the end. The odds are definetely wrong to me and the values lies with Medvedev @ 3.60 😏
-
4 hours ago, delfino said:
Today Marozcan to beat Elias Ymer is something good. Price is wonderful 1.66 offered by bet365.
And again i go in a separate single worth to risk case, Haffmann to beat the only one hand player mister Tsitsipas. Huge price again by 4.33 bet365
Anytime i see Tsitsipas on grass i rate the opponent's probabilities. The German is super server, and he can break the weak Tsitsipas backhand a couple of times, imo.
Tell me something please. Why Tsitsipas continues to use his backhand in such ridiculous way? Are his team of coaches composed by blind men? I think yes, they are blind, and they give me. the opportunity to risk against him.
Good luck punters!
ST is the 2022y champion here, so that speaks volumes about his dedication today. Personally, wouldn't go against him today, given the fact that he will be 100 % focused.
-
Dimitrov underrestimated Shelton yesterday, who is really unexperienced clay courter, but he should be 100 % focused today. This match depends only of Dimitrov brings his A game and given the fact that his best performance on clay through the years had been in MC, i think he could edge this one. Dimitrov @ 1.91.
-
Thiem should be good enough today, at least for a set. He remains one of the best on the tour on clay and of he is on his day, he may even win this one. Rune hasn't had too many matches on clay so far and i think the Austrian will be fired up after yesterday's win to make the things really hard for the Norwegian. Theim to win a set @ 1.75.
-
Well, Walden has to be the bet for today. He has a hell of a record against Un - Nooh and is yet to lose. The only concern is that all of these wins were in short formats / first to 6/.
- Fader and Foo_Fighter
-
2
-
25 minutes ago, Foo_Fighter said:
Kleckers is one of the worst players I've ever watched lol
+1
-
-
Andreev must be worth a few bucks against Z. Bergs. His 1st serve worked like a charm and he looked quite confident on return. I haven't watched Bergs but at odds against, i will take my chances and bet on my compatriot.
- amity and CzechPunter
-
2
-
On 9/8/2022 at 5:12 PM, four-leaf said:
I just love Caro Garcia, the best social media name of all pro athletes outthere. #Flywithcaro and we should fly with her.
Did you fly with Caro yesterday??
-
1 minute ago, four-leaf said:
If you haven't seen Flying Caro lately you've missed something because she's flying and when she's flying you have to fly with her.
? You really should get a real life, day time job hahah.
-
Well, this kind of attitude certainly raises a few questions, at the very least, it was obvious that Pinches couldnt care less after taking the lead at 1:3. In the final frame he had a couple of chances to attack, but he decided to play defensive...quite strange indeed.
- amity and alexcaruso808
-
2
-
3 hours ago, raduvlad1995 said:
what do you guys think about med-norrie and rublev-nishioka ? I see them both as favorites clearly but still it feels like they could be upset(even rublev)
Can't see it. With RUblev being such a strong baseliner, can't see how Nishioka could hurt him in any way possible.Both favourite should win in 2.
-
3 hours ago, liquidglass said:
Firstly, I want you to know that I did not set out to have a go at you in anyway. Rather my main aim as has always been the case with people that I have mentored over ther years, is to first bring them to realise what this game is about and secondly to make them come to realise what it is that they are supposed to be doing in terms of understanding the working structure of the game. Let me throw this out there by saying that gambling against the bookies is the greatest manipulation of the mind ever known to man and it is totally impossible to come to grips with the modus operandi unless someone opens the door from the inside to let you into the mystery that lies underneath. Let me make it clear by saying that I am not selling or trying to sell anything to you. Rather I always speak most times from the power of the knowledge that i possess stemming from the love that i have for the game. I have been tremendiously blessed to know all that I know about this indulgence. Everyone that has benefitted from me over the years have just run into me by accident from discussions on forums
Your answer to me makes me understand that your fundamentals like many other people is completely wrong as I already knew is the case. This game is based on a translation or the expression of the metaphysical into reality. Two factors control the game, namely market moves and market forces. Market Moves (odds movement) gives birth to Market Force within a cycle that commences from when the odds are first released to the beginning of play. Within the scope of market force is a whole lot of encrypted information that needs to be translated or unscrambled by applied knowledge. Murray carrying a slight injury, or Edmunds being unrecognizable from yesterday were all factored into the odds before play. It is just that you could not see or sense what you have never understood. The same goes for a team that receives a red card or even misses a penalty in the 93rd minute. Everything about the game is deliberate. There is no such thing as luck or an out-of-place occurence. Crazy eh! The idea then will be to unlearn everything that you have ever known with a view to relearning by training your mind to understand most of the underlying workings of the game. In summary I would say that everything that happens in a game is a replay of everything that has already happened in the metaphysical realm. The default reasoning now is that the winner of any given match always manifests even before the first ball is struck. YOUR ABILITY TO FIND THAT WINNER IS HEAVILY RELIANT ON THE RESOURCES AT YOUR DISPOSAL of which "stats" is only a minor contributory factor. Everytime you set out to pick your games or select your winners, you do so by responding to the predominant voices echoing in your head. These voices have a known source. Their key function is to oppose, confuse and bring you deliberately to the loser - This is the key battlepoint of this indulgence. How do you now train your mind to know which voice is authentic and which is not? It takes years of practice and adhering to norms and protocols within the workings of the game to acquire this knowledge. It also takes stubborn will and mind power to be able to navigate within the minefields of this mysterious setup. "Knowing" does not guarantee that you will win everyday, however it will guarantee that you will be able to spot deadspots more frequently from a mile off. It will also guarantee the inner strength to ward of any outside influence aimed at corrupting your thought process and leading you easily and deliberately to losers. Therein lies the power to suceed tremdiously. Crazy but interesting eh!
Now, here is a very important fact that I want you to take away. Most people who are involved in this game are all wired in the same way when it comes to being receptive. These contrary voices or counter productive information that enters the punter's or listener's head can be very contagious and damaging to anyone who even sees or hears it accident. Why? Because however serious or unserious you are about what you put out, your words will always come out coated in power and authority and there is no way to limit the vast damage that you could be causing instinctive followers who dare to listen to you. Personally I would feel very inadequate if i had to produce two comprehensive wrongs in a row. Finally, I always say this; that there is no connection with what happened in the match with the resulting outcome if we can prove that outcome preceeds play itself. Why then go through the wasteful and pointless effort of a post match explanation that only serves to preserve pride and promote further catastrophe?Well, i am glad we cleared that out how the translation of the metaphysical into reality happens, but what are your thoughts on today's card and do you see any value in it?
- neilovan, CzechPunter and Torque
-
1
-
2
-
Well, that seems not right to me. Paire to beat Rune @ 3.85 with local bookie. Paire got a good win yesterday against Gojowzcyk where managed to hit 11 aces in the process. His 1st serve worked as a charm for him and given Rune's poor form and bad results against weaker opponents than Paire, i am all over the Frenchman in this one + the fact that Benoit is arguably the better and more talanted player of the two. Rune's lack of experience will do him no good here.
- amity and CzechPunter
-
2
-
1 hour ago, GhostLetter said:
I’m not sure you’ve described the format correctly at all?! It seems a bit all over the place, if that’s the format! Why are some rounds ‘best of’ and some rounds ‘first to’? Also, why are some rounds ‘best of’ an even number, and some rounds ‘best of’ an odd number?
Feeling better??
-
I will be on Dan Evans today @ 3.00 with bet365. Looking at his record, grass is his favourite surface. He already won a grass event this week and should be well prepared for today. Berretini is exceptional on grass although i was far from impressed by him in Stuttgart. He returned from a 3 months break with a title but his fitness remains unseen. I think there is every chance he just turns himself off if things go sideways and focus mainly on the upcoming WIlmbledon. Dan will give him a good run for sure and i think Berretini runs out of motivation and energy at some point.
Australian Open 2024
in Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
Posted
The freshness might cost Zverev the match, although he has been heavily dominating this fixture on hard courts. Zverev to take a set though.