Thursday bankers

[bowles10]

bankers here chaps:ok 2.50 York DANDYMAN best sprinter seen out this year IMO. Cant belive it's 7/2 prob cos the soft ground, but the horse has acted on it before so why not today.

[traf]

Re: Thursday bankers 3.25 Pride of Nation.

[whoneedsrio]

Re: Thursday bankers

3.25 Pride of Nation.

I do hope your right traf :hope :hope :hope :hope :hope Rio.

[Woodie]

Re: Thursday bankers

bankers here chaps:ok 2.50 York DANDYMAN best sprinter seen out this year IMO. Cant belive it's 7/2 prob cos the soft ground, but the horse has acted on it before so why not today.

Same here 4/1 on betfair now have had a decent bet on this one today, if he drifts again then I'm going in again :ok

[galileorock]

Re: Thursday bankers

5:10 York trick or treat

[sensibleboy]

Re: Thursday bankers 2.25 Stratford - MCQUEEN

[Fader]

Re: Thursday bankers Taking abit of a chance but going for: Thedublinpublican 4.10 Strat also for 23/1 Argento is good value, but no banker

[arsenalpunter]

Re: Thursday bankers 2.15 - York - Scarlet Runner.

[davidn]

Re: Thursday bankers hi 4.00 dabbers ridge good luck;)

[FleetFanatic]

Re: Thursday bankers 4.10 STRATFORD Il Penseroso

[galileorock]

Re: Thursday bankers

5:10 York trick or treat

1st winner 5.5/1 :cheers :beer :beer

[bowles10]

Re: Thursday bankers well done Galileo think we needed that on a poor day. FF's won as well @ 8/13

[traf]

Re: Thursday bankers

3.25 Pride of Nation.

This horse should have won easily, I thought the jockey had a poor ride and held a poor position throughout the race, on what seemed to be the fastest horse in the field.

[whoneedsrio]

Re: Thursday bankers

This horse should have won easily' date=' I thought the jockey had a poor ride and held a poor position throughout the race, on what seemed to be the fastest horse in the field.[/quote'] My first reaction was that the jockey had given the horse too much to do & reading the race report on the Racing Post site the reporter thought he might have riden closer to the pace but that he still would have not beaten the winner, I am inclined to agree. As I have said in my thread, on reflection the winner went quite quick up front & had them all at it, this is backed up by the times for the day which have this race as easily the best of the day.

RACE

WINNER

DIST

TIME

TIME/F

COMPARISON

COMP per F

ALLOW

TS

RPR

OFFICIAL GROUND

TIME BASED GROUND

:OWSize('RP_Popup','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/result.sd?race_id=398092&r_date=2006-8-24',800,485,'no','yes','yes')'>1:45

:OWSize('','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/racing_horse_form.sd?horse_id=657926',800,480,'no','yes','yes')'>Doctor Brown

6f

1m 14.67s

12.45s

+3.57s

+0.6s

-0.49s/f

104

—

Soft

Gd-Sft

:OWSize('RP_Popup','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/result.sd?race_id=412544&r_date=2006-8-24',800,485,'no','yes','yes')'>2:15

:OWSize('','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/racing_horse_form.sd?horse_id=654429',800,480,'no','yes','yes')'>Silk Blossom

6f

1m 14.82s

12.47s

+3.72s

+0.62s

-0.49s/f

103

—

Soft

Gd-Sft

:OWSize('RP_Popup','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/result.sd?race_id=411833&r_date=2006-8-24',800,485,'no','yes','yes')'>2:50

:OWSize('','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/racing_horse_form.sd?horse_id=604975',800,480,'no','yes','yes')'>Reverence

5f

1m 0.68s

12.14s

+2.88s

+0.58s

-0.49s/f

102

122

Soft

Gd-Sft

:OWSize('RP_Popup','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/result.sd?race_id=414509&r_date=2006-8-24',800,485,'no','yes','yes')'>3:25

:OWSize('','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/racing_horse_form.sd?horse_id=645217',800,480,'no','yes','yes')'>Smart Enough

1m

1m 40.73s

12.59s

+2.73s

+0.34s

-0.42s/f

112

111

Soft

Gd-Sft

:OWSize('RP_Popup','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/result.sd?race_id=414510&r_date=2006-8-24',800,485,'no','yes','yes')'>4:00

:OWSize('','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/racing_horse_form.sd?horse_id=513111',800,480,'no','yes','yes')'>Quito

7f

1m 26.30s

12.33s

+3.40s

+0.49s

-0.42s/f

98

118

Soft

Gd-Sft

:OWSize('RP_Popup','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/result.sd?race_id=414511&r_date=2006-8-24',800,485,'no','yes','yes')'>4:35

:OWSize('','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/racing_horse_form.sd?horse_id=401224',800,480,'no','yes','yes')'>Anna Pavlova

1m4f

2m 36.60s

13.05s

+6.10s

+0.51s

-0.42s/f

94

—

Soft

Gd-Sft

:OWSize('RP_Popup','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/result.sd?race_id=414651&r_date=2006-8-24',800,485,'no','yes','yes')'>5:10

:OWSize('','http://www.racingpost.co.uk/horses/racing_horse_form.sd?horse_id=643154',800,480,'no','yes','yes')'>Trick Or Treat

1m6f

3m 3.88s

13.23s

+8.08s

+0.58s

-0.42s/f

83

—

Soft

Gd-Sft

Smart Enough looks a more than useful type & it will be interesting to see how much the handicapper puts him up. There is talk of the Cambridgeshire being the target & it would not be the first winner of this race to go to Newmarket & win. Rio.