Jump to content

Party Poker doing nothing about Cheats


GB80

Recommended Posts

Could someone please explain to me how Party Poker can tell the Mrs that "they are satisfied there is no evidence of foul play" in these 3 hands. All the others at the table were German. She only knew this because of what a couple of the others were saying once it was down to 6 players. Top 5 got a $64 seat. #Game No : 7065037469 ***** Hand History for Game 7065037469 ***** NL Texas Hold'em Trny:40127773 Level:16 Blinds-Antes(6,000/12,000 -200) - Saturday, May 17, 17:37:31 ET 2008 Table WSOP Sub Qualifier Rebuy (1421770) Table #1 (Real Money) Seat 9 is the button Total number of players : 6 Seat 2: knote28 ( 108,110 ) Seat 3: HighFish76 ( 182,050 ) Seat 4: ClaireBella ( 69,450 ) Seat 7: paddyoe ( 71,810 ) Seat 8: rosenkranz76 ( 15,180 ) Seat 9: Chrisdyb ( 33,400 ) Trny:40127773 Level:16 Blinds-Antes(6,000/12,000 -200) knote28 posts ante [200] HighFish76 posts ante [200] ClaireBella posts ante [200] paddyoe posts ante [200] rosenkranz76 posts ante [200] Chrisdyb posts ante [200] ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to ClaireBella [ Qh 9d ] ClaireBella folds paddyoe folds knote28: all in rosen rosenkranz76 is all-In [14,980] Chrisdyb folds knote28 folds HighFish76 folds rosenkranz76 does not show cards. rosenkranz76 wins 34,180 chips #Game No : 7065046266 ***** Hand History for Game 7065046266 ***** NL Texas Hold'em Trny:40127773 Level:16 Blinds-Antes(6,000/12,000 -200) - Saturday, May 17, 17:40:45 ET 2008 Table WSOP Sub Qualifier Rebuy (1421770) Table #1 (Real Money) Seat 9 is the button Total number of players : 6 Seat 2: knote28 ( 88,910 ) Seat 3: HighFish76 ( 182,050 ) Seat 4: ClaireBella ( 50,250 ) Seat 7: paddyoe ( 110,210 ) Seat 8: rosenkranz76 ( 15,180 ) Seat 9: Chrisdyb ( 33,400 ) Trny:40127773 Level:16 Blinds-Antes(6,000/12,000 -200) knote28 posts ante [200] HighFish76 posts ante [200] ClaireBella posts ante [200] paddyoe posts ante [200] rosenkranz76 posts ante [200] Chrisdyb posts ante [200] ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to ClaireBella [ 4c 3h ] ClaireBella folds paddyoe folds rosenkranz76 is all-In [14,980] Chrisdyb folds knote28 folds HighFish76 folds rosenkranz76 does not show cards. rosenkranz76 wins 34,180 chips #Game No : 7065051690 ***** Hand History for Game 7065051690 ***** NL Texas Hold'em Trny:40127773 Level:16 Blinds-Antes(6,000/12,000 -200) - Saturday, May 17, 17:42:45 ET 2008 Table WSOP Sub Qualifier Rebuy (1421770) Table #1 (Real Money) Seat 8 is the button Total number of players : 6 Seat 2: knote28 ( 125,110 ) Seat 3: HighFish76 ( 149,650 ) Seat 4: ClaireBella ( 31,250 ) Seat 7: paddyoe ( 86,410 ) Seat 8: rosenkranz76 ( 15,380 ) Seat 9: Chrisdyb ( 72,200 ) Trny:40127773 Level:16 Blinds-Antes(6,000/12,000 -200) knote28 posts ante [200] HighFish76 posts ante [200] ClaireBella posts ante [200] paddyoe posts ante [200] rosenkranz76 posts ante [200] Chrisdyb posts ante [200] ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to ClaireBella [ Jd 2h ] HighFish76: pervers paddyoe: nh HighFish76 folds ClaireBella folds HighFish76: thx paddyoe folds rosenkranz76 is all-In [15,180] Chrisdyb folds knote28 folds rosenkranz76 does not show cards. rosenkranz76 wins 34,380 chips

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Party Poker doing nothing about Cheats The "all in Rosen" comment by itself is the sort of annoying and illegal chat that is sometimes made with no real malice. But: Hand 1: 34.18k in the pot. knote28 needs to put in another 8.98k to call, which is 3.8/1 pot odds. HighFish76 needs to put in another 2.98k to call, which is over 11/1 pot odds. And they were the two big stacks. And this happened again 3 minutes later with exactly the same players involved? And 2 minutes after that knote28 folds getting 6/1 pot odds? I'm usually very reluctant to accuse somebody of cheating on the basis of a couple of strange decisions (people do some very silly things). But I'm really struggling to find a reason to give them the benefit of the doubt here! What did the Mrs say when she reported this to Party? Is it possible she focused too much on the remark in chat rather than the bizarre folds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Party Poker doing nothing about Cheats

The "all in Rosen" comment by itself is the sort of annoying and illegal chat that is sometimes made with no real malice. But: Hand 1: 34.18k in the pot. knote28 needs to put in another 8.98k to call, which is 3.8/1 pot odds. HighFish76 needs to put in another 2.98k to call, which is over 11/1 pot odds. And they were the two big stacks. And this happened again 3 minutes later with exactly the same players involved? And 2 minutes after that knote28 folds getting 6/1 pot odds? I'm usually very reluctant to accuse somebody of cheating on the basis of a couple of strange decisions (people do some very silly things). But I'm really struggling to find a reason to give them the benefit of the doubt here! What did the Mrs say when she reported this to Party? Is it possible she focused too much on the remark in chat rather than the bizarre folds?
She never even mentioned the remarks. I wrote the email for her as she didn't really know what to put. There were other remarks made in between these hands, and after the 3rd one Rosenkranz said "call me". However with him only raising when those 2 were in the blinds, I take that with a pinch of salt. 1st time she asked them to have a look at it, and they said they were satisfied. So she emailed them back with the actual hands, and they've said they'll monitor them for the future. It's all a bit ridiculous.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Party Poker doing nothing about Cheats I cant boycott them - I dont play there since they stole millions in player contribibuted funds from their Monster promo (they took total buy ins from x months and shared it amongst projected entrants over the full promo), using US laws as an excuse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Party Poker doing nothing about Cheats Party Poker don't give a shit about you. No-one should be playing at Party Poker after the Monster rip off. How they are still the 4th largest site is beyond me! Same with Absolute. Amazing the number of player playing there hasn't dropped. Both these sites should of gone under for what happened

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Party Poker doing nothing about Cheats I do think Party are, at best, getting complacent in their market dominance. The graphics are naff and they now charge you for the privilege of holding your money if you haven't played there for so long. I also have to reboot my two-year-old laptop to get their software to open and it often freezes up, forcing me to repeat the process, after just one S&G. I don't know about power corrupting but it's certainly taken the edge off Party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Party Poker doing nothing about Cheats

Well try to stop yourself now;) The players are no worse than at ipoker surely:eek As yet they haven't mass ripped anyone off or been caught with a superuser account:hope
The WSOP are the main thing I play there, and the standard is dire. I've been very close to qualifying there a couple of times, and I reckon it's the easiest way. Once they've finished, I would hardly play there. I'm leaving $50 in there, and just playing the WSOP $3 sats. Once it's gone it's gone. I've never really played on ipoker reguarly, although this week I've tried 3 satellites to the ECOOP and won a seat in 2 of them, so maybe I'll play there a bit more.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...