The Scientist Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 Ive just watched 3 races. The 2.35 at Newbury and the two maidens at Doncaster. All similar. Steady pace set by nervous jockeys fearing the sticky, softened ground. Every right to. The pace quickened at the 2f pole and and in a blink the eye the horses were spread out like the end off the Grand National. Congratulations to the winners and the placed horses but will they be ruined as future winners by the handicapper.? Or will the tailed off simply could not act in the going be thrown in on better ground. I see the last in the 2.20 was Krona 80-1. Well she seemed to be leading "on the bridle" at the 2f pole. All good looking fillies. In my experience the "last" usually ends up with a career winning total exceeding the winner in these false races after the handicapper has done his worst. My opinion of deserved marks at face value of the race. Krona (mark 62) v Soul Sister ( mark 91) is 0-1 in career wins now but which one wins the most in their full career? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang on Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 Going is always a factor for some horses. For me, I look for disappointing runs. If it looks like they didn't try (maybe because of the ground), I put them in my tracker for their next 3 runs - they should come good within those runs. MCLARKE 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.