Liamsaunders096 Posted December 1, 2018 Share Posted December 1, 2018 (edited) Im going to be starting with a bank of £20. Each bet will be 5% or 10% of bankroll depending on odds and confidence. Matches will be fully researched using soccer 24 website. I am only allowed to place a maximum of 1 bet at any given time. This means i can NOT have 2 bets running at the same time. Odds have to be at least 1.40 Wish me luck Edited December 2, 2018 by Liamsaunders096 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liamsaunders096 Posted December 1, 2018 Author Share Posted December 1, 2018 Bet 1 - Tucuman vs San Martin (63 mins 2-1) Tucuman to score over 1.5 goals @3.25 £1 returns £3.25 (5% staked) REASONING : San Martin have 57% ball possession. They have had a total of 15 shots with 7 on target whereas Tucuman have 6 shots and 2 on target. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liamsaunders096 Posted December 1, 2018 Author Share Posted December 1, 2018 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Liamsaunders096 said: Bet 1 - Tucuman vs San Martin (63 mins 2-1) Tucuman to score over 1.5 goals @3.25 £1 returns £3.25 (5% staked) REASONING : San Martin have 57% ball possession. They have had a total of 15 shots with 7 on target whereas Tucuman have 6 shots and 2 on target. WINNER !!! WINNER !!! WINNER !!! Tucuman score in the 74th minute to equalize Total Bank = £22.25 Edited December 2, 2018 by Liamsaunders096 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liamsaunders096 Posted December 2, 2018 Author Share Posted December 2, 2018 Bet 2 - Sydney vs Western Sydney (0-1 36 mins) Sydney to score next goal @1.40 £2.20 returns £3.08 REASONING : Sydney have had 8 shots 6 on target so far. Western Sydney have only 2 shots in total. Sydney have 39 dangerous attacks whereas Western Sydney only have 12. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betdevop Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 i don't get it. https://www.google.com/search?q=Tucuman+vs+San+Martin&oq=Tucuman+vs+San+Martin&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#sie=m;/g/11g1lxhs3x;2;/m/04hpk1;dt;fp;1;; its San martin that scored at 73rd and 75th minutes. if you have bet on Tucuman to score over 1.5 goal at 63rd minutes (2-1), Tucuman should have scored 2 more goals in order for you to win the bet. ie (4-1) etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betdevop Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 On 12/2/2018 at 12:59 PM, Liamsaunders096 said: WINNER !!! WINNER !!! WINNER !!! Tucuman score in the 74th minute to equalize Total Bank = £22.25 i dont get it..can any one explain..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry_rag Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 1 hour ago, betdevop said: i dont get it..can any one explain..? I’ll guess he meant to say San Martin to score >1.5 goals and has been confused by both teams having Tucuman in their name (according to the link you posted). That would be supported by the stats he quoted. So his bet was that the away team would score at least one more goal. The home team, obviously, already had >1.5 goal anyway. Looks like the thread has died a death anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betdevop Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 12 hours ago, harry_rag said: I’ll guess he meant to say San Martin to score >1.5 goals and has been confused by both teams having Tucuman in their name (according to the link you posted). That would be supported by the stats he quoted. So his bet was that the away team would score at least one more goal. The home team, obviously, already had >1.5 goal anyway. Looks like the thread has died a death anyway. oh right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.