Valiant Thor

DRUMLEE WATAR..7.59pts...NR ...+7.59
JOHNNY BOOM.....4.82pts...LOST...2nd
GLORIOUS RIO.......7.59pts...WON...+20.87
STAKED...20...RETURNED...28.46...PROFIT...8.46
AUG  +62.14
SEPT +40.10

I dont believe in luck
Everything is quantifiable
 

DRUMLEE WATAR..7.59pts...NR ...+7.59
JOHNNY BOOM.....4.82pts...LOST...2nd
GLORIOUS RIO.......7.59pts...WON...+20.87
STAKED...20...RETURNED...28.46...PROFIT...8.46
AUG  +62.14
SEPT +40.10

AUG  +62.14
SEPT +31.61

DRUMLEE WATAR..7.59pts
JOHNNY BOOM.....4.82pts
GLORIOUS RIO.......7.59pts
20pts Staked B365
1 winner small profit/break even

SOPHIES STAR 5.89pts......................NR   +5.89
MINELLA TRUMP 6.63pts...............WON +13.26
PAGAN 3.06pts.................................LOST
GREAT EMBASSADOR 4.42PTS.......WON +13.26
STAKED 20..RETURNED....32.41...PROFIT +12.41
AUG  +62.14
SEPT +31.61

SOPHIES STAR 5.89pts......................NR   +5.89
MINELLA TRUMP 6.63pts...............WON +13.26
PAGAN 3.06pts.................................LOST
GREAT EMBASSADOR 4.42PTS.......WON +13.26
STAKED 20..RETURNED....32.41...PROFIT +12.41
AUG  +62.14
SEPT +31.61

SOPHIES STAR 5.89pts......................NR   +5.89
MINELLA TRUMP 6.63pts...............WON +13.26
PAGAN 3.06pts.................................LOST
GREAT EMBASSADOR 4.42PTS.......WON +13.26
STAKED 20..RETURNED....32.41...PROFIT +12.41
AUG  +62.14
SEPT +31.61

SOPHIES STAR 5.89pts......................NR   +5.89
MINELLA TRUMP 6.63pts...............WON +13.26
PAGAN 3.06pts.................................LOST
GREAT EMBASSADOR 4.42PTS.......WON +13.26
STAKED 20..RETURNED....32.41...PROFIT +12.41
AUG  +62.14
SEPT +31.61

AUG  +62.14
SEPT +19.20

SOPHIES STAR 5.89pts
MINELLA TRUMP 6.63pts
PAGAN 3.06pts
GREAT EMBASSADOR 4.42PTS
20pts staked ...B365
2 for profit

AUG  +62.14
SEPT +39.20

DARLING DU LARGE 13.79 Place
DARLING DU LARGE 6.21 Win
20pts staked B365..place needed for profit

AUG  +62.14
SEPT +39.20

DARLING DU LARGE 13.79 Place
DARLING DU LARGE 6.21 Win
20pts staked B365..place needed for profit

AUG  +62.14
SEPT +39.20

DARLING DU LARGE 13.79 Place
DARLING DU LARGE 6.21 Win
20pts staked B365..place needed for profit

AUG  +62.14
SEPT +59.20

BROSTAIGH  8.21pts
NERO ROCK 11.79pts
1 winner for profit

WON....SECOND SLIP 10.71pts @ 3.25 = 34.80pts
LOST....BILLHILLY 9.29pt
Total return = 34.80 ...Profit 14.80pts
AUG  +62.14
SEPT +59.20

Hope it wins
My lad had it in a ew double with Good American (won 11/2)
keep telling him singles only then there's no pressure if your first wins but he's always trying to hit the ball out the park

WON
Win return 5.37 @ 6.00 = 32.22pts
Place only Return 14.63 @ 2.2 = 32.18
Total return = 64.40 ...Profit 44.40pts
AUG  +62.14
SEPT +44.40

WON
Win return 5.37 @ 6.00 = 32.22pts
Place only Return 14.63 @ 2.2 = 32.18
Total return = 64.40 ...Profit 44.40pts
AUG  +62.14
SEPT +44.40

WON
Win return 5.37 @ 6.00 = 32.22pts
Place only Return 14.63 @ 2.2 = 32.18
Total return = 64.40 ...Profit 44.40pts
AUG  +62.14
SEPT +44.40

Just 2 things if you must continue this folly
1/ You will never win money because you flit from one 'idea' to another like a butterfly on crack looking for the perfect flower. (it aint going to happen)
Something doesn't work as singles you try a trixie ,that doesn't work, you'll try a yankee, you'll stick the same losing selections into a lucky 15 oh surprise surprise that doesn't work either. Its been bleeding obvious since Gods dog was alive they dont make money blindly following their selections, if they did every bookmaker on the planet would be shut down, even a blind man on a galloping horse could see that .
2/ I care not who you describe as 'the top 3' but If you even spent a modicum of your time actually analysing these 'tips' you'll find somewhere near what looks like a profit in just 4 lines
First............. Split these tips into naps only by any one of your 'the top 3'
Second........ Split the naps into handicap / non handicap selections
Third.............You should find the return (profit) from the winners split approx 20/25% to 75/80% in the non handicaps favour (ergo: most of the profit comes from them)
Fourth...........Ditch the Handicap naps
TA~DAAAA  your somewhat nearer to making a profit in 4 lines of the bleeding obvious than you have been since you started
I'll make the bleeding obvious even more bleeding obvious
The RP has a selection box with 13 paid guessers for each meeting
look at the selections of the NON HCP races only
If there is only 1 horse that is napped then that is a selection (it may be napped by more than 1 guesser as long as its the only horse napped its a selection )
The mind boggling theory behind this is for all the crap they turn out they might actually spend some real time selecting a decent horse as a nap and if no other horse has been napped then not much attention has been paid to them, ergo; all being well it should be a reasonable selection due to it
a) being the only napped horse in a race
b) the handicapper hasn't messed about with the weights yet
There were 3 selections today actualy
Epsom 3.15 New Mission (Newmarket nap) won @ 4/5
Epsom 4.35 Uncle Dick (The Times nap) lost @ 9/2 (was also my selection in £20 challenge but for different reasons than above , SIGH )
NAbb 4.25 Beholden (Lambourn nap) won @ 1/4
Restrictive odds on the winners maybe but dutching all 3 would have produced a 30% roi .
A steady drip fills a bucket as they say and all for free, it brings a tear to your eye ?
 

Interesting observations but alas it falls on deaf ears, The Equaliser has found something that "interests" him and he is quite happy to spend good money flogging dead horses (pun intended) but fair play to him he puts it out there and takes it on the chin. The man is not for wavering even in the face of often overwhelming evidence. I have a simple philosophy, "if it aint working stop doing it"

Just 2 things if you must continue this folly
1/ You will never win money because you flit from one 'idea' to another like a butterfly on crack looking for the perfect flower. (it aint going to happen)
Something doesn't work as singles you try a trixie ,that doesn't work, you'll try a yankee, you'll stick the same losing selections into a lucky 15 oh surprise surprise that doesn't work either. Its been bleeding obvious since Gods dog was alive they dont make money blindly following their selections, if they did every bookmaker on the planet would be shut down, even a blind man on a galloping horse could see that .
2/ I care not who you describe as 'the top 3' but If you even spent a modicum of your time actually analysing these 'tips' you'll find somewhere near what looks like a profit in just 4 lines
First............. Split these tips into naps only by any one of your 'the top 3'
Second........ Split the naps into handicap / non handicap selections
Third.............You should find the return (profit) from the winners split approx 20/25% to 75/80% in the non handicaps favour (ergo: most of the profit comes from them)
Fourth...........Ditch the Handicap naps
TA~DAAAA  your somewhat nearer to making a profit in 4 lines of the bleeding obvious than you have been since you started
I'll make the bleeding obvious even more bleeding obvious
The RP has a selection box with 13 paid guessers for each meeting
look at the selections of the NON HCP races only
If there is only 1 horse that is napped then that is a selection (it may be napped by more than 1 guesser as long as its the only horse napped its a selection )
The mind boggling theory behind this is for all the crap they turn out they might actually spend some real time selecting a decent horse as a nap and if no other horse has been napped then not much attention has been paid to them, ergo; all being well it should be a reasonable selection due to it
a) being the only napped horse in a race
b) the handicapper hasn't messed about with the weights yet
There were 3 selections today actualy
Epsom 3.15 New Mission (Newmarket nap) won @ 4/5
Epsom 4.35 Uncle Dick (The Times nap) lost @ 9/2 (was also my selection in £20 challenge but for different reasons than above , SIGH )
NAbb 4.25 Beholden (Lambourn nap) won @ 1/4
Restrictive odds on the winners maybe but dutching all 3 would have produced a 30% roi .
A steady drip fills a bucket as they say and all for free, it brings a tear to your eye ?
 

MLM ?
whatever
I'll leave you to lose the rest of your bank in peace
 

Just 2 things if you must continue this folly
1/ You will never win money because you flit from one 'idea' to another like a butterfly on crack looking for the perfect flower. (it aint going to happen)
Something doesn't work as singles you try a trixie ,that doesn't work, you'll try a yankee, you'll stick the same losing selections into a lucky 15 oh surprise surprise that doesn't work either. Its been bleeding obvious since Gods dog was alive they dont make money blindly following their selections, if they did every bookmaker on the planet would be shut down, even a blind man on a galloping horse could see that .
2/ I care not who you describe as 'the top 3' but If you even spent a modicum of your time actually analysing these 'tips' you'll find somewhere near what looks like a profit in just 4 lines
First............. Split these tips into naps only by any one of your 'the top 3'
Second........ Split the naps into handicap / non handicap selections
Third.............You should find the return (profit) from the winners split approx 20/25% to 75/80% in the non handicaps favour (ergo: most of the profit comes from them)
Fourth...........Ditch the Handicap naps
TA~DAAAA  your somewhat nearer to making a profit in 4 lines of the bleeding obvious than you have been since you started
I'll make the bleeding obvious even more bleeding obvious
The RP has a selection box with 13 paid guessers for each meeting
look at the selections of the NON HCP races only
If there is only 1 horse that is napped then that is a selection (it may be napped by more than 1 guesser as long as its the only horse napped its a selection )
The mind boggling theory behind this is for all the crap they turn out they might actually spend some real time selecting a decent horse as a nap and if no other horse has been napped then not much attention has been paid to them, ergo; all being well it should be a reasonable selection due to it
a) being the only napped horse in a race
b) the handicapper hasn't messed about with the weights yet
There were 3 selections today actualy
Epsom 3.15 New Mission (Newmarket nap) won @ 4/5
Epsom 4.35 Uncle Dick (The Times nap) lost @ 9/2 (was also my selection in £20 challenge but for different reasons than above , SIGH )
NAbb 4.25 Beholden (Lambourn nap) won @ 1/4
Restrictive odds on the winners maybe but dutching all 3 would have produced a 30% roi .
A steady drip fills a bucket as they say and all for free, it brings a tear to your eye ?
 

Just 2 things if you must continue this folly
1/ You will never win money because you flit from one 'idea' to another like a butterfly on crack looking for the perfect flower. (it aint going to happen)
Something doesn't work as singles you try a trixie ,that doesn't work, you'll try a yankee, you'll stick the same losing selections into a lucky 15 oh surprise surprise that doesn't work either. Its been bleeding obvious since Gods dog was alive they dont make money blindly following their selections, if they did every bookmaker on the planet would be shut down, even a blind man on a galloping horse could see that .
2/ I care not who you describe as 'the top 3' but If you even spent a modicum of your time actually analysing these 'tips' you'll find somewhere near what looks like a profit in just 4 lines
First............. Split these tips into naps only by any one of your 'the top 3'
Second........ Split the naps into handicap / non handicap selections
Third.............You should find the return (profit) from the winners split approx 20/25% to 75/80% in the non handicaps favour (ergo: most of the profit comes from them)
Fourth...........Ditch the Handicap naps
TA~DAAAA  your somewhat nearer to making a profit in 4 lines of the bleeding obvious than you have been since you started
I'll make the bleeding obvious even more bleeding obvious
The RP has a selection box with 13 paid guessers for each meeting
look at the selections of the NON HCP races only
If there is only 1 horse that is napped then that is a selection (it may be napped by more than 1 guesser as long as its the only horse napped its a selection )
The mind boggling theory behind this is for all the crap they turn out they might actually spend some real time selecting a decent horse as a nap and if no other horse has been napped then not much attention has been paid to them, ergo; all being well it should be a reasonable selection due to it
a) being the only napped horse in a race
b) the handicapper hasn't messed about with the weights yet
There were 3 selections today actualy
Epsom 3.15 New Mission (Newmarket nap) won @ 4/5
Epsom 4.35 Uncle Dick (The Times nap) lost @ 9/2 (was also my selection in £20 challenge but for different reasons than above , SIGH )
NAbb 4.25 Beholden (Lambourn nap) won @ 1/4
Restrictive odds on the winners maybe but dutching all 3 would have produced a 30% roi .
A steady drip fills a bucket as they say and all for free, it brings a tear to your eye ?
 

Why is that , they're just paid guessers nothing more nothing less

The above validates my point, there's only 2 in profit from there naps ,Charlatans the lot of them.
Dont fall for the bullshit thrown out , ''I get paid for the hours I put in studying'' , It hasn't done them much good has it ?
If your going to lose lose your own way, not following some of these lot over a cliff.
Im glad they dont make aeroplanes