vladisimo2

I'd like to see seeds that lose first round matches - or second if getting a bye - getting no paycheck inclusive of appearance fees. They're supposed to win and it's hard not to conclude, as @vvararusuggested, that sometimes they just aren't bothered about winning. The way I see it, if you're seeded then you're making a good living out of the sport and so can afford the penalty of not getting paid for a first match loss at a tournament. I suppose though that if something like that were implemented, it would just kick the can down the road and you'd get top players tanking in their next match. Realistically though, players not trying and sometimes blatantly so is a blight that tennis is stuck with. I just don't see a feasible way to stamp it out completely.

Oh I've seen shapo will also play. I would avoid him.
At fucsovis sinner -I played over 18,5 games (or over 17,5 for less risk). They played in AO and fucsovis won, but the first two sets were 6-4 6-4 , so a reasonably close match as it should also be today. Fucsovis is crafty and sinner has power and is on the rise.
Pospisil-struff. Over 18,5 games seems to be the lowest games line here on the site that I bet on. I personaly didn't play this match at all. While I do think it will be close and both can keep their serve well, neither of them is a consistent player that you can know for sure what he's gonna do. But if I would have bet anything on this match it would be over 18,5 games in the match or struff taking one set( I mean if marchenko did it, I don't see why struff can't).

https://www.essentiallysports.com/wta-tennis-news-marin-cilic-says-his-best-days-in-tennis-are-yet-to-come/
It's even better!  

The rules should be improved and players payed for each round only if they win that round. So many disappointments with "big" players going and losing in the first round only to mark their presence, take the money and go home. People are watching them (and probably bet on them) wanting to see their good performance and, instead, they see that attitude. 

Yesterday finaly all of the tips were won. Today for the semis :
Med-raonic, I would go with a simple bet ,Medvedev winning at 1,45 odds. He beat raonic before, he played very well here and he's got the skillset to put milos off balance. I hope med will remain hungry for this match, but as far as I know he was qualified for WTF even before Paris so motivation shouldn't be a problem.
Rafa-Zverev , I bet that zverev will atleast take 1 set. Zverev also beat Rafa before on an indoor court, he has played very good tennis here untill now. As long as double fault machine alex doesn't return , he might even beat rafa.

Yesterday finaly all of the tips were won. Today for the semis :
Med-raonic, I would go with a simple bet ,Medvedev winning at 1,45 odds. He beat raonic before, he played very well here and he's got the skillset to put milos off balance. I hope med will remain hungry for this match, but as far as I know he was qualified for WTF even before Paris so motivation shouldn't be a problem.
Rafa-Zverev , I bet that zverev will atleast take 1 set. Zverev also beat Rafa before on an indoor court, he has played very good tennis here untill now. As long as double fault machine alex doesn't return , he might even beat rafa.

wow never knew that lisicki even plays anymore. Ain't she prety old ?

Yeah, Stan can be weird nowadays, seriously weird at times. I don't think he's going to get any deep Grand Slam runs anymore, but we are going to see some upsets from him and he may very well ruin someone's run!

welp I've won everything but the match rublev-wawrinka, I think that took most of us by surprise. On one hand I'm happy that stan won since he's my favorite player (I also like rublev alot) , on the other hand that loss took quite a chunk of my budget.
I actualy think humbert-raonic will be reasonably close since humbert did atleast one good thing  against cilic , he served well. I went with over 19,5 games total( you can go with over 18,5 to play it a bit safer as I can also see milos imposing himself easily but I'm just not sure about humbert, he's a weird player ).
zverev to beat wawrinka - zverev served well and he is a better defender and a more consistent player compared to rublev.  Stan will probably push back and give zverev trouble, but if the german's serve works as it did till now, he will always be the one that gets  more BP's than stan.
AND the last one would be rafa-busta , over 17,5 games. Nadal struggled more than I could believe against both lopez and thompson, he truly does seem to find it hard on these courts. Busta looked ok , doing his thing, he seems more comfortable than rafa here. If the match against thompson was over 17.5 games, I don't see why busta can't match that. But hey rafa does grow stronger during tournaments, so who knows ? maybe he's gonna give busta a beating.

Stan is a strange man but he is my soul player (which is bad in betting)  Many times I bet on him against worse players and he lost. When he is playing against very good players (having odds 4.5), of course i am afraid to bet on him

Agree. I watched Gombos - Goffin. Gombos played "nothing special". PCB should take it easily.

Also forgot about busta-gombos. I would definetly go for a busta win. Careno should play a horrible match to lose to gombos , and I don't see why he would do that , he seemed to be focused as usual.

Today I'd take humbert to beat cilic , since his odds are actualy quite big(1,60) -he just seems more solid , more motivated , he's also got that lefty advantage .
Rublev will in my opinion straight set stan again, he is consistent enough to repeatedly push stan back and make him commit forced errors.
And at giron against raonic I would go with over 8,5 games in the first set-giron seems to be in fine form and he did push raonic prety hard in Indian Wells 2019 . 
Also can you guys post a good link here about handicap betting on tennis ?  Seems like an interesting option.

I know rafa always hated indors and never won in Paris or Nitto , but I still feel that he can straight set lopez. Krajinovic is not nadal, and I think if Rafa chose to play here he chose it for a reason. Also yeah the odds are most of the time unfair concerning most of the bets , but as long as you win the bet ,to me atleast it doesn't matter.

Raonic herbert should be reasonably close , since herbert is a good serve and volley player and raonic is well raonic. Herbert also plays on home soil. Wawrinka paul could be an easy match for stan if tommy doesn't show up at all (I've seen paul do that before ), but after the performance against simon I think paul can keep it reasonably close or even trouble stan if he missfires. And nadal is just a vastly superior player compared to lopez, and excepting the case that lopez serves at a very high first serve percentage , he shouldn't trouble nadal at all since it's a prety slow court.

went for a medvedev win today(not sure about it), rafa winning 2-0, herbert -raonic over 18,5 games and stan-paul over 17,5 games.

I'd avoid goffin for now, I don't remember where I've heard or read that he was kind off shook by the whole Corona situation.

He's in awful form. Best left alone.

Just an insight Sandgren ran in the snow in Kazakstan without tshirt as a punsihment after losing his match. So he may be motivated.

I'd go for evans taking atleast one set against stan, and over18.5 games on humbert-tsitsipas. Interesting news about sandgren there, I ' ll probably add herbert taking  a set against him on my accumulator.

Thanks for the welcome man I've always wanted to be part of a tennis betting forum where people post at a regulate rate. I get it why you're not a fan since it is indeed risky business but I'm only hoping to win 2  bets like this one per day and with high enough stakes it gives good and fast returns. I am watching the matches live everytime I bet on the server, yesterday I got my 2 games on Caruso, today managed to win the first one on Albot and I'll try to get a second game in the giron-djere match. EDIT Djere kept his serve as well.