Jump to content

what would be a sustainable ROI


teaulc

Recommended Posts

Re: what would be a sustainable ROI It will depend a lot on the size of the tournament, the blind structure, and of course on how good you are and how good the field is. Just a guess, but I wouldn't be surprised if the top players in the WSOP main event would have a ROI of 500% (although of course the variance is huge and it only happens once a year, so nobody's going to live long enough for their actual ROI to be statistically meaningful). On the other hand, in a 60 player turbo I'd guess the top players might have less than a 50% ROI. But as I say, just a guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: what would be a sustainable ROI Theres and article about this in last months Poker Player (with matasow on front). Obviously over a huge number of hands but Moormans ROI is 37%. And apparently one of the top $1-$10 MTT specialists 'Bluntman' has a ROI of 17% over 10,628 Tournaments. In the money 16.63% of the time and longest non cashing streak of 51 tourneys. Obviously a big winn in your non usual stakes wouild make a massive difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: what would be a sustainable ROI Hey all, I wrote that article for PokerPlayer (i'm their strategy editor) and whilst it's certainly possible to have an roi% exceeding 100% over the long term that's by no way the mean. If you OPR Annette_15, JohnnyBax and AjkHoosier for PokerStars they've all got amazing ROI%. AJK is 162% over 5113 mtts (this is skewed by one score of $900k), Annette = 108% over 2782 mtts and Bax is 87% over 5479 mtts. Of course they're complete sickos and way above what what be considered good. Shaundeeb who has won the PokerStars Yearly TLB for the last two years is a really good example of something to aspire to. This guy puts in insane volume all will play anything froma $3r a $20 180 man mtt to the $200re-buy. His stats show a 57% roi over 13910 tournaments with an ABI of $77.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: what would be a sustainable ROI

Hey all, I wrote that article for PokerPlayer (i'm their strategy editor) and whilst it's certainly possible to have an roi% exceeding 100% over the long term that's by no way the mean. If you OPR Annette_15, JohnnyBax and AjkHoosier for PokerStars they've all got amazing ROI%. AJK is 162% over 5113 mtts (this is skewed by one score of $900k), Annette = 108% over 2782 mtts and Bax is 87% over 5479 mtts. Of course they're complete sickos and way above what what be considered good. Shaundeeb who has won the PokerStars Yearly TLB for the last two years is a really good example of something to aspire to. This guy puts in insane volume all will play anything froma $3r a $20 180 man mtt to the $200re-buy. His stats show a 57% roi over 13910 tournaments with an ABI of $77.
Try again! Sorry PL, silghtly immature private joke...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: what would be a sustainable ROI

Shaundeeb who has won the PokerStars Yearly TLB for the last two years is a really good example of something to aspire to. This guy puts in insane volume all will play anything froma $3r a $20 180 man mtt to the $200re-buy. His stats show a 57% roi over 13910 tournaments with an ABI of $77.
If you look at Shaundeeb's record in more detail, it illustrates perfectly the point I was trying to make in my reply to Al's original question, which is that MTT's vary such a lot that it's really not possible to give a sensible answer to "What ROI?" Broken down by field sizes, Shaundeeb's record looks like: 19-180 players (6260 tournaments): ROI = 20%. 181-1000 players (4081 tournaments): ROI = 60%. 1001+ players (3919 tournaments): ROI = 168%. If it were possible to break down the results according to blind structure, I suspect you'd find that also made a big difference.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: what would be a sustainable ROI sustainable means sustainable doesnt it? achieving a satisfactory ROI and keeping or beating that level over a long period of time. from what i have read and has been posted 20% seems to be about average,yes or no? i think what i am asking is this,i have been very rigid in keeping my games recorded this year and i was wondering at the end of the year what sort of ROI a reasonable player should be hitting. i am mainly a tournament player which i why i asked the question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: what would be a sustainable ROI

So you want to know what ROI you can reasonably be expected to achieve and be able to sustain it throughout the year. :ok ........so that's two questions really Al :tongue2
now who`s being pedantic??:tongue2:tongue2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: what would be a sustainable ROI

Oiiiiiiiii - that's my job around here........
It is? :unsure Does AvonGirl know? :loon Al, I know it seems like a simple question, but I'm not sure I understand it. :$ Surely all you need is a positive ROI in order to maintain/sustain your 'roll at any level....or am I being dim? (very likely)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: what would be a sustainable ROI Getting (swiftly) back on topic :tongue2 1 year for multiple types of MTT I wouldn't view as a particularly large sample for saying X% is the goal - a few (even one) positive results could have a massive impact on the ROI - similarly, the absense of one large result could over impact results too....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: what would be a sustainable ROI

Getting (swiftly) back on topic :tongue2 1 year for multiple types of MTT I wouldn't view as a particularly large sample for saying X% is the goal - a few (even one) positive results could have a massive impact on the ROI - similarly, the absense of one large result could over impact results too....
I was going to make a similar point. :ok Especially in large field MTTs, the variance is HUGE. Yesterday I had a look at the payout structure for the PokerStars Sunday Million. If you were an "average" player (by which I mean one who will finish in a random position) and played the Sunday Million every week for fifty years, then the standard deviation in your ROI over that period would be about 30%. That means that if you played the tournament for a poker lifetime, and judged yourself purely on your ROI in those tournaments, you couldn't even be that confident that you were a "(very) long term winning player" if you had around a +50% ROI up to that time. The variance is less in smaller tournaments, but even if, say, you play 500 MTTs with fields of a couple of hundred over the course of a year, I reckon the standard deviation of your ROI over that period would still be something like 10-20%: i.e., if you're a "+20% player", then it's not that unlikely that you'd have a losing year (or have a +40% year, of course).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...