FleetFanatic Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 I was reading somewhere that if you put £100 a month and get 10% compounded interest, that after 20 years, the £24000 paid in would be worth £76000. This got me thinking, if we treated a bookmakers account like a bank account and aimed for say 15% interest every 30 days, and paid in an extra £100 every 30 days, the first year would look something like this: MONTH<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> MONEY IN BANK INCLUDING DEPOSIT FOR MONTH 15% OF BANK DAILY RATE (15% OF BANK DIVIDED BY 30) – TO NEAREST 10p NEW BANK AFTER 30 DAYS JAN 100 15 0.50 115 FEB 215 32.25 1.10 248 MAR 348 25.20 1.80 402 APR 502 75.30 2.60 580 MAY 680 102 3.40 782 JUNE 882 132.30 4.50 1017 JULY 1117 167.55 5.60 1285 AUG 1385 207.75 7 1595 SEPT 1695 254.25 8.50 1950 OCT 2050 307.50 10.30 2359 NOV 2459 368.85 12.30 2828 DEC 2928 439.20 14.70 3369 I've put months but it would, in fact, be 30 day periods. 1200 deposited, with the aim of building up to 3369 with 12 months. What are everybody's ideas on this??? What would be the best way to win 'the daily aim'??? Stop at a winner fav's on horses? Football? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorkingForTheEnemy Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory I dont know about the best way of making your profit but, in terms of LONG term projects, I was once thinking of something similiar. If you started with £500 and made 2% of your starting bank every week(£10) (on average) in a year you'd double your bank.(50 x 2% being 100%) This would give you: Year 1 = £1000 Year 2 = £2000 Year 3 = £4000 Year 4 = £8000 Year 5 = £16,000 Year 6 = £32,000 Year 7 = £64,000 Year 8 = £128,000 Year 9 = £256,000 Year 10 = £512,000 It would take great discipline as its such a slow process but the target of 2% profit a week(half your aim), should be achievable. Im only 25(26 soon:cry ) and Id be more than happy at the thought of having £500,000 in the bank by the time I was 36. I think the key word with any slow long term projects is DISCIPLINE, its all too easy looking to speed it up, especially in the early stages when profits seem small, by picking out bets that are maybe not right. Good luck with anything you decide to go with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorkingForTheEnemy Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Do you need to make a daily aim?? Rather than looking at making 50p a day it may be better at looking at making £15 a month or £3.25 a week. The problem I see with setting targets over a small period of time is the temptation to chase. If your first bet loses you'll find yourself chasing , looking for bets that day, just to make a profit of 50p. If you set the target as monthly you know you've got all month to find a bet to make up the loss. At £3.25 a week you could go for £10 a week on a 1/3 shot in the footy each weekend. Back 1 goal or more @ 1.1 for £30 5 times during the month( really starting to love that bet). Five winers would give you your 15% and thats without rolling the profits on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinhofap Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory I agre that your idea of a staking plan is good, it is not new, but the problem remains always the same: you need to find value bets. If you could make 1% profit every day and adjusted stakes every day, you bank would grow 3600% in a year. Still, making a consistent profit of 1% each day is very very hard. As for backing 1/3 favourites on football, what about when you lose? You will take a long time to recover, because you have invested a lot to win your target. If backing 25/1 horses gave you more value, this would be a better idea, it's not about the odds (you don't win more the shorter they are...), it's about winning in the long run. The main issue is finding bets that pay off long term, I thinking stopping at a loser is not a good idea in anything because it's just mathematically incorrect, and anyone trying it will ALWAYS lose in the long run. It all comes down to finding value and then studying your results and adjusting your staking plan to maximize profits. Your idea of compound interest is a good way to boost profits, but you need to calculate risk, because you are always on the edge of losing your whole bank if you get greedy and increase your risk level too much. I hope some of this helps and I don't want to sound too negative, but I have gone down this road before on another thread, and after 1 month of good profits, the positive trend stopped, and since my stakes were higher, I lost my profits much faster. Remember that. Apart from that it is a good idea, and I wish you good luck. Pinho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 2, 2006 Author Share Posted November 2, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory I'm wouldn't back 1/3 favourites on the football. Everybody knows the odds have to be better than 1/2 for me or no bet! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 2, 2006 Author Share Posted November 2, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Do you need to make a daily aim?? Rather than looking at making 50p a day it may be better at looking at making £15 a month or £3.25 a week. The problem I see with setting targets over a small period of time is the temptation to chase. If your first bet loses you'll find yourself chasing , looking for bets that day, just to make a profit of 50p. If you set the target as monthly you know you've got all month to find a bet to make up the loss. At £3.25 a week you could go for £10 a week on a 1/3 shot in the footy each weekend. Back 1 goal or more @ 1.1 for £30 5 times during the month( really starting to love that bet). Five winers would give you your 15% and thats without rolling the profits on. Some excellent ideas there! Btw, I was going to continue the grid into further years but I thought I would get some opinions first. :ok Even money shots - if you lose chasing 50p, the next days target would be 50p + 50p (2 days target) plus 50p lost stake = £1.50 - next bet would be £1.50. A second losing day = £3 bet on the 3rd day A third losing day = £5 bet on the 4th day Would have to be a shocking run not to find 1 winner a week from 7 bets, which is surely all it would need? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanga Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Hi FF, Hope this table helps based on 600-650 sequence of bets. Based on a series of between 600 and 650 bets. A shorter series would be less likely to contain sequences as long as these and a longer series would be more likely. (%)Strike Rate Anticipation of Sequences Expected(75% chance) 50:50(50% chance) Unlikely(25% chance) V. Unlikely( 40 10 12 14 20 41 9 12 13 20 42 9 11 13 19 43 9 11 13 19 44 9 11 12 18 45 8 11 12 18 46 8 10 12 17 47 8 10 11 17 48 8 10 11 16 49 8 10 11 16 50 7 9 11 15 51 7 9 10 15 52 7 9 10 15 53 7 9 10 14 54 7 8 10 14 55 6 8 9 14 56 6 8 9 13 57 6 8 9 13 58 6 8 9 13 59 6 8 9 12 60 6 7 8 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 3, 2006 Author Share Posted November 3, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Hmmmm. Up the target to 5% per week for 4 weeks (20% of bank in a 4-week period), and the figures look even more appealing. PERIOD (OF 28 DAYS) MONEY IN BANK TARGET FOR PERIOD (ROUNDED UP TO £) WEEKLY (ROUNDED UP TO £) NEW TARGET BANK 01 £100 £20 £5 £120 02 £220 £44 £11 £264 03 £364 £73 £19 £440 04 £540 £108 £27 £648 05 £748 £150 £38 £900 06 £1000 £200 £50 £1200 07 £1300 £260 £65 £1560 08 £1660 £332 £83 £1992 09 £2092 £419 £105 £2512 10 £2612 £523 £131 £3136 11 £3236 £648 £162 £3884 12 £3984 £797 £200 £4684 13 £4784 £957 £240 £5744 14 £5844 £1170 £293 £7016 15 £7116 £1424 £356 £8540 16 £8640 £1728 £432 £10368 17 £10468 £2094 £524 £12564 18 £12664 £2533 £634 £15200 19 £15300 £3060 £765 £18360 20 £18460 £3692 £923 £22152 21 £22252 £4451 £1113 £26704 22 £26804 £5361 £1341 £32168 23 £32268 £6454 £1614 £38724 24 £38824 £7765 £1942 £46592 25 £46692 £9339 £2335 £56032 26 £56132 £11207 £2802 £67240 27 £67340 £13468 £3367 £80808 28 £80908 £16182 £4046 £97092 29 £97192 £19439 £4860 £116632 30 £116732 £23347 £5837 £140080 31 £140180 £28036 £7009 £168216 32 £168316 £33664 £8416 £201980 33 £202080 £40416 £10104 £242496 34 £242596 £48520 £12130 £291116 35 £291216 £58244 £14561 £349460 36 £349560 £69112 £17478 £419472 Anybody want to be rich in 3 years? :lol Just need to decide on the approach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happygooner Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Hmmmm. Up the target to 5% per week for 4 weeks (20% of bank in a 4-week period), and the figures look even more appealing. PERIOD (OF 28 DAYS) MONEY IN BANK TARGET FOR PERIOD (ROUNDED UP TO £) WEEKLY (ROUNDED UP TO £) NEW TARGET BANK 01 £100 £20 £5 £120 02 £220 £44 £11 £264 03 £364 £73 £19 £440 04 £540 £108 £27 £648 05 £748 £150 £38 £900 06 £1000 £200 £50 £1200 07 £1300 £260 £65 £1560 08 £1660 £332 £83 £1992 09 £2092 £419 £105 £2512 10 £2612 £523 £131 £3136 11 £3236 £648 £162 £3884 12 £3984 £797 £200 £4684 13 £4784 £957 £240 £5744 14 £5844 £1170 £293 £7016 15 £7116 £1424 £356 £8540 16 £8640 £1728 £432 £10368 17 £10468 £2094 £524 £12564 18 £12664 £2533 £634 £15200 19 £15300 £3060 £765 £18360 20 £18460 £3692 £923 £22152 21 £22252 £4451 £1113 £26704 22 £26804 £5361 £1341 £32168 23 £32268 £6454 £1614 £38724 24 £38824 £7765 £1942 £46592 25 £46692 £9339 £2335 £56032 26 £56132 £11207 £2802 £67240 27 £67340 £13468 £3367 £80808 28 £80908 £16182 £4046 £97092 29 £97192 £19439 £4860 £116632 30 £116732 £23347 £5837 £140080 31 £140180 £28036 £7009 £168216 32 £168316 £33664 £8416 £201980 33 £202080 £40416 £10104 £242496 34 £242596 £48520 £12130 £291116 35 £291216 £58244 £14561 £349460 36 £349560 £69112 £17478 £419472 Anybody want to be rich in 3 years? :lol Just need to decide on the approach. This is the kind of thing I keep thinking of. Sensible staking, with increased percentage staking, building slowly every day. There does seem to be quite a difference of opinion on whether it truly can be done though. Of recent I seem to have a great day where I make between £3-£10.00 (bank at the time was only around £30.00) with most bets coming off (doubles, trebles, singles) and then follow it the next day with an absolute shocker where nothing goes as you would expect and the whole thing just seems entirely random! Take Chelsea & Real Madrid yesterday. WTF???! On the whole would a general voice of opinion be to stay away from doubles, trebles? I was thinking that I might start with a double quite likely to come in, then move up to a treble if that wins, then a 4-fold and so on and so forth. The first loser instantly puts me back to a double. Trouble is the double fails on a surprisingly high amount of attempts. This was where my example of £10.00 winner came in. Fair amount won on a double, then the treble came in giving me even more. Next day I didn't even bother with a 4-fold but instead started on a double again. That lost, as did the next and the next and the next until I finally got a winner after clearing out all of yesterdays profit. I just seem to be perpetually level. Neither down nor up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 6, 2006 Author Share Posted November 6, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Take Chelsea & Real Madrid yesterday. WTF???!Chelsea were away, Real Madrid too short a price. But nobody ever listens to me. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 6, 2006 Author Share Posted November 6, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Sod it. Let's go for the 5% a week. Week 1: to win £5. Stoke to win tonight 11/10 @ bet365. Rounded up to nearest £, £5 staked to return £5.50. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorkingForTheEnemy Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Good luck with this FF. Ill be watching with great interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lovell Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory lucky mate! cov have a goal disallowed in the 95min!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happygooner Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory lucky mate! cov have a goal disallowed in the 95min!!! Yeah I had money on that too. wondering how much injury time the ref was going to allow. 96 mins before he blew up! I would not have been impressed!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 6, 2006 Author Share Posted November 6, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory lucky mate! cov have a goal disallowed in the 95min!!! Not lucky, as there was obviously a reason why the ref disallowed it. :lol If the same incident has occured in the first minute, you wouldn't call it lucky. 1st bet wins :clap Bank now £105.50. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 7, 2006 Author Share Posted November 7, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Really fancy Bury tonight against Wrexham @ 19/20. And Celtic are surely a must @ 2/7 with bet365, when 1/5 elsewhere. So much for discipline! Maybe this should be 'aim to 5% 4 times in a row before recalculating the 5%, with a top up once a month'..... .....hence changing from 'week' to sequence'. Sequence 2: to win £5. Bury to beat Wrexham @ 19/20 bet365 Celtic to beat Falkirk @ 2/7 bet365 Double - stake rounded up to nearest £: £4 staked to win £6.03. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 7, 2006 Author Share Posted November 7, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Celtic to beat Falkirk @ 2/7 bet365 0-0 on 88 mins :$ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 7, 2006 Author Share Posted November 7, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Oh now it's extra-time, they score. :@ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey barton Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory tell me about it fleet i had charlton and surprise surprise they score 3 minutes into extra time, so annoying!!!:wall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 8, 2006 Author Share Posted November 8, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Maybe I should apply my treble rules here about short prices. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lovell Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory anymore bets to add to this FF? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 11, 2006 Author Share Posted November 11, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Yep need to win £9 now from a bank of £101.50. £9 on Arsenal (Sunday) to beat Liverpool 21/20 totalbet to win £9.45 bank now £92.50 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 13, 2006 Author Share Posted November 13, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Arsenal result as hoped. :clap Bank now £110.95. :ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 17, 2006 Author Share Posted November 17, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Saturday: Gravesend & Northfleet vs Oxford evens @ bet365 (Yes, I know but Oxford are another level to The' Fleet.) £5 to win £5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lovell Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory any thing to add to still FF? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 24, 2006 Author Share Posted November 24, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory Yep. Just waited for my football trebles to be posted. I'm ready now. After losing last week (you notice how backing against you're own team does you every time?), we need last week's £5, last week's £5 stake and this week's £5 won. So we need to win £15 this week! Bank now £105.95. The value odds in my ratings is Man Utd @ 6/4 to beat Chelsea @ BET365. £10 staked to try and get our £15. Bank now £95.95. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted November 26, 2006 Author Share Posted November 26, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory So to cap off a miserable day, Man Utd are held to a 1-1 draw. 4 weeks gone & the promised £100 top-up is added to the bank. Bank now £195.95. Next bet sees us needing to get a return of £25 plus 5% of the £220 we are supposed to have in the bank (£11) Total 'next target' is therefore £36. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lovell Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory anything during the mid-week football? champions leauge? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted December 6, 2006 Author Share Posted December 6, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory No, as you've gathered by now. Was tempted to go for Arsenal draw but the old 'being the away team' put me off - doh! wish I had now. Just waiting for the right home team at the right price. If anything pops out this week there's another £11 target to be added, making a target of £47 to win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleetFanatic Posted December 8, 2006 Author Share Posted December 8, 2006 Re: 'Bank Account' Theory So this is week 6: Chelsea to beat Arsenal 3/4 with totalbet. I just can't see anything other than Chelsea in this. £63 on 'em to win £47.25 Bank now £132.95. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.