LeMale
-
Posts
1,952 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Posts posted by LeMale
-
-
Just now, LeMale said:
Don't know if there's a L-15 Ebor comp, but here's mine anyway.
-
-
8 minutes ago, LEE-GRAYS said:
Day 178
the Thurrock napers @LEE-GRAYS @Carole-dawney @Harry_Faint99 and honorary member @LeMale can we hit the big one this week 😂
I was just about to say that my one is better odds with any one but 365, and when i checked 365 are now the best at 25-1 and is now half the price it was with everyone else!!! Not about for the rest of the day, so i was lucky i had to do it early...lets hope it wins with the other 3.
-
-
1940 Y - Available Angel @ 14-1 Bet365
-
1655 S - Madame Fenella @ 8-1 WH
(I think i've lost my mojo, can't seem to find anything at a price.)
-
1520 R - Secret Guest @ 25-1 ew WH
-
1658 T - Vesperado @ 100-1 ew Bet365
-
1830 W - Chase The Dollar @ 33-1 ew Bet365
-
1740 GP - Arabella Cee @ 25-1 ew Bet365
-
1415 L - Snow Eagle @ 100-1 ew Bet365
-
1445 K - Sorontar @ 50-1 ew Bet365
-
21 minutes ago, MCLARKE said:
It said you had to choose either £20 free bet or 50% of losses as free bet by end of first day, did you choose?
-
1530 L - Trojan Truth @ 20-1 ew Bet365
-
3 hours ago, The Equaliser said:
2.10 Ascot. I find this quite strange as far as betting is concerned. The market is headed by the reserve Samui with a forecast price of 9/4. What I would like to know is if I took a price on another runner e.g. Spirit Mixer at 6/1 and the reserve didn't run, would the bookies deduct say 30p in the pound because the reserve didn't run?
Did it show that there was a rule 4? I can't see how it can be called a non runner if it was never in the race to begin with. Different country i know, but in Ireland they have reserves in a lot of races that are included in the betting, but never a rule 4 when they don't run.
-
1525 C - Ano Syra @ 20-1 ew Bet365
-
Was there really no Racing Chat yesterday? I think that's a first for me, don't ever remember that happening before. 😲
- black rabbit and Bronxie
-
1
-
1
-
15 hours ago, Zilzalian said:
Just shows, but you have to say it as you see it. Either January is a very good horse or this was a badly/falsely run race only time will tell but the time was slow here with-
january 112
beckman 99
green triangle 95.
Make of that what you will.
Just watched the race and having originally thought that Green Triangle might have been a bit nervy after what happened in that last race, i don't think that was it. Although i didn't think any jockey could ride a horse worse than that, the jockey yesterday was pretty close imo, using a lot of pace at the start for no reason by disputing the lead and then kicking for home too early while still going around the bend, therefore being 2 or 3 wide over-taking the outsider that was never going to be a problem anyway. Then run out of steam way before the finish. If badly/falsely run race is high in your opinion, i would agree and wouldn't give up on GT just yet.
-
2 minutes ago, harry_rag said:
Most of my bets are anytime goalscorer bets so I'm on Lacazette to score at 11/4. If that felt a bit skinny for a fiver freebie I was flagging that 22/1 for him to score 2 or more didn't look bad (bigger than my "fair" odds but not quite by enough margin for me to bet).
I forget that not everyone is as steeped in the player markets as I am so I'll try and be a bit clearer in future! Then again, now you know how I feel sometimes when I'm bamboozled by stuff on the racing thread!
France getting tonked 3-1 at the moment.
Not just you, me too sometimes. 🤣 I'm so slow at typing, when i started they were 1-0 up!!! Cheers for thinking of me anyway, i'm not always at my laptop so don't always see things if they need to be done quick.
-
37 minutes ago, harry_rag said:
@LeMale with Sky Bet but you need to be quick. 22/1 for 2+ reasonable if you want to chuck your freebie at a bigger return.
Sounded good, whatever it was, right up my street the longer odds.
-
Just now, LeMale said:
Only just seen this, not sure i know what that is ? (2+ reasonable?) What is that?
Oh, 22-1 is reasonable, is that what you meant? Still didn't know what 2+ was though. Remember i know nothing about football betting and by that i mean what simple initials stand for (simple to you i mean) or 2+, is that 2 or more of something? Sorry for being an idiot, but thanks for your help.
-
26 minutes ago, harry_rag said:
@LeMale with Sky Bet but you need to be quick. 22/1 for 2+ reasonable if you want to chuck your freebie at a bigger return.
Only just seen this, not sure i know what that is ? (2+ reasonable?) What is that?
-
1900 T - With Annie Luck @ 20-1 ew Lad
-
46 minutes ago, Zilzalian said:
All valid points techno but my basic point is the there are 1000's of mug punters that have been mugged off there. I used to put my bets on the night before when I was working just like many a punter. I am not a great believer in coincidences and the horse that drifted massively in the betting was the one that had probs at the start, was he trying to restrain it and that's what caused it to get upset? We will never know.
Yea maybe, can't look back to see now, deleted it, but i get your point on the amount of money the bookies would have made and us poor old punters would have lost.
Not so much the night before, but i get up early, anything between 0300- 0500hrs and i used to have a coffee and get started on looking though the races and placing some bets, and still getting BOG, i miss that. I start later now because BOG has changed and find i'm still going through stuff late afternoon because of interruptions, where-as i used to be finished by 1000hrs, 11 at the latest, but i suppose i should be grateful i still get BOG at all, so i shouldn't complain.
Naps - Wednesday 21st August
in NAP of the Day Competition
Posted
1350 Y - Tees Spirit @ 50-1 ew Bet365