My Silly Baseball Bet Idea.....

[FleetFanatic]

.....this is silly? (I'll try and explain it as best as possible) 100 bets @ a small stake start - I like a small stake, possible big return challenge! For instance @ 10p..... 100 = £10. Bets are solely on match outcome. Once all 100 are placed and won or lost, those that won are accumulated onto the next round of bets. So if 77 bets won, your next round of bets would be on the next 77, each stake would match each previous winning bet. If the odds were 1/2 (most of match odds are higher than this) it would take only 1 of these 100 go for 12 matches to show a profit? In the early days, winnings would be small, but as the accumulators build..... .....my plan is to see how long it takes to have only one rolling bet left - at which point, you take the winnings. Anyway, if you think this is a silly idea then shoot me down in flames and I'll never mention it again! Note - I know nothing about baseball really but this sport seems ideal for my idea as it's a 'two horse race' with no draws!

[Tulenos]

Re: My Silly Baseball Bet Idea..... Then why don't you choose tennis, match-up in horse races or motor races etc.? You state you know nothing about baseball - why do you wanna bet on it - you're breaking the most important rule which reads you have to know what you're betting on - rules of the game at the very least, but much more to be in with a chance. Anyway - there was a challenge called 10 in a row on another forum and VERY few participants were able to put togehter at least one string of 10 winners in a row - and we allowed to start anew with a brand new 100 pts bank. So first - you should reconsider what you wanna bet on. Second - forget the whole thing, imo;)