Skittle

Norwich v Man City   2   @   1.15.
Hull v Fulham   2   @   1.53.
Wigan v Charlton   1   @   1.83.
£10 Treble.

I seem to remember one or two threads going back over the years where 'points' were being used. I always gave more creedence to a selection if there was money involved as there would seem to be no real interest as to whether the bet wins or not. Nothing to lose so they can go gung ho,

Other people looking in on a thread may see the term 'points' and make their own assumption. They are less likely to take an interest in your posts because of this.

Points. not money?

Just as long as Skittle doesn't come on and agree with you! 

Bet 17. £
Nottm Forest v Leicester...Leicester + 3 @ 1.02.

If 5 bets were done at the same time, possible on a Saturday, they would count as 5 separate bets ( I've done a few Saturday bets for a goal that would have had several 3pm kick offs ). The order they were posted in, if KO was the same time, would determine how many of the winners could be added to a total in the event of one being a losing selection.
As the consecutive bets league is really about numbers, the whole thing is effectively a rolling accumulator anyway.
My current run is mainly about doubling up the stake with a number of bets. The fact that they are also managing to win and therefore getting to bigger numbers is merely a side product if you wish, as are a few other bets/threads on the forum.

I've always felt that the old 'gut feeling' is worth some form of consideration.

It's been that way since I started doing it 30 years ago................I thought nobody would notice. ?

Last bet won.
Bet 18: 12.72 points on 20+ booking points in Celtic v Rangers at 1/80 with Sky Bet
Pleasantly surprised to get this at better than the 1/100 minimum for consecutive bets purposes.

The stake for the second bet is roughly what I expect to be adding when the first bet wins. It's easy to estimate and I usually add a bit more anyway.

Bet 11. £58.70.
Huddersfield v Derby...Huddersfield + 3 @ 1.02.
Bet 12. £
Celtic v Rangers...Celtic + 3 @ 1.03.

Just noticed the numbers. Good going.....................

Just noticed the numbers. Good going.....................

Back weekend of 5th Feb

To be honest and to the best of my knowledge there won't be too many that would fall foul of the new ruling. It would be almost like Mission Impossible to check. I do have a copy of my own 442 and will sift through that soon, but I'm sure there won't be many, if any at all. I was thinking along the lines of what has been done above when another regular suggested it to me. I've also run it past the powers that be and it's been 'okayed'.
It does apply to the Lays as well.
I don't think we would lose any of your entries in the top 25 if we checked back. ?
I'm sure you would agree that some bets like 1/500 and Lay @280 are somewhat extreme.

I knew this would be thought provoking. 
From this point forward................that's the phrase I left out. There will be no going back over any 'runs'.
Many thanks for your input gentlemen, much appreciated. Onwards and upwards.

I knew this would be thought provoking. 
From this point forward................that's the phrase I left out. There will be no going back over any 'runs'.
Many thanks for your input gentlemen, much appreciated. Onwards and upwards.

To be honest and to the best of my knowledge there won't be too many that would fall foul of the new ruling. It would be almost like Mission Impossible to check. I do have a copy of my own 442 and will sift through that soon, but I'm sure there won't be many, if any at all. I was thinking along the lines of what has been done above when another regular suggested it to me. I've also run it past the powers that be and it's been 'okayed'.
It does apply to the Lays as well.
I don't think we would lose any of your entries in the top 25 if we checked back. ?
I'm sure you would agree that some bets like 1/500 and Lay @280 are somewhat extreme.

To be honest and to the best of my knowledge there won't be too many that would fall foul of the new ruling. It would be almost like Mission Impossible to check. I do have a copy of my own 442 and will sift through that soon, but I'm sure there won't be many, if any at all. I was thinking along the lines of what has been done above when another regular suggested it to me. I've also run it past the powers that be and it's been 'okayed'.
It does apply to the Lays as well.
I don't think we would lose any of your entries in the top 25 if we checked back. ?
I'm sure you would agree that some bets like 1/500 and Lay @280 are somewhat extreme.

For a 'run' to be recognised and added to the league no prices shorter than 1.01 or 1/100 will be acknowledged. There's no problem with putting them in your bet but if you get to a stage where your numbers are big enough to make it onto the league top 25, those particular bets will not be counted towards your total.
 

Total at £99.05. Not sure whether to make the odd 95p or be cheeky and say job done.
Together, this latest little run stands at 151 consecutive bets.

Total at £99.05. Not sure whether to make the odd 95p or be cheeky and say job done.
Together, this latest little run stands at 151 consecutive bets.

From little acorns.........................

Used to do every bet on a spreadsheet which did my numbering of bets automatically..  im starting to see why I did that ?