nkdz Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 I read a lot lately about this system and decided to try it "on paper". Must admitt that this system was completely unknown to me two weeks ago. I know the theory more or less, but never tryed it before, so i'll try to do my best here to see how is it working. As reccomended i'll start with 100pts. This program will be used, http://www.albionresearch.com/kelly/ but i will stake only 1/4 of optimal stake. I think that 200 bets will be enough for some serious evaluation of this system, and to see how good i am in this. :) Feel free to leave any kind of comment here, as well as some of your experiences with this system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkdz Posted February 4, 2010 Author Share Posted February 4, 2010 Re: Kelly criteria Btw Only odds from Pinnacle will be used. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1907zico Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 Re: Kelly criteria Good luck uptheirons :ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkdz Posted February 4, 2010 Author Share Posted February 4, 2010 Re: Kelly criteria Thanks mate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkdz Posted February 4, 2010 Author Share Posted February 4, 2010 Re: Kelly criteria 1) Lacko vs Petzschner: Lacko: 2 pts @ 2.03 2) Berrer vs Troicki: Berrer: 1.25 pts @ 2.34 3) Melzer vs Marchenko: Marchenko: 1.2 pts @ 3.31 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkdz Posted February 6, 2010 Author Share Posted February 6, 2010 Re: Kelly criteria It's too early to write more detailed stats, one is won, two lost but both lose were close to being won so we move on to new bets. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.