Jump to content
** April Poker League Result : 1st Like2Fish, 2nd McG, 3rd andybell666 **

Automated in-play laying - discuss


happygooner

Recommended Posts

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices Interesting post there Matthew!! I don't think backtesting will work on this strategy, I think the only way to see if it works is to test it for real. Definately useful stats for laying at low odds, cheers. I don't think there has been a loss in the 6 days so far? Certainly encouraging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices

Interesting post there Matthew!! I don't think backtesting will work on this strategy, I think the only way to see if it works is to test it for real. Definately useful stats for laying at low odds, cheers. I don't think there has been a loss in the 6 days so far? Certainly encouraging.
Backtesting must work.............it just needs someone with time and effort to do it. I had hoped I showed in post #83 that it can be done.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices

Laying the field at 2.0 does make sense. A friends dad lays the field for 1.03 in every race. The logic being that he only needs 1 in 33 to go down for him to make his small amount of money. Looking at the PDF dices up'd this appears to make sense. Of the 29,703 races in the pdf, 31,031 horses were matched at 1.03. At 1.03 you would expect to be right 97.1% of the time, truth is that only 95.7% come in. Looking further down the pdf i spot some potential trouble for HG et al. The trend I note is that the higher the odds you lay at they, the more likely than expectation they are to happen. Take 1.88 from the pdf, you would expect a horse matched at this price to come in 53.2% of the time. According to the pdf this actually happens 58.5% of the time. The longer the odds, the greater the difference between expectation and what actually happens. Although the pdf doesn't go this far, assuming the diffferential comtinues then it appears that laying at 3 or 4 or 5 would yield more winners than you might hope. The difference here though is that you are obviously laying more horses than just a single horse in a single race and this might yield a result that masks the underlying facts that longer odds happen more than the odds suggest. Which may be why it works for laying and would not work for backing. Thoughts?
But you forget one thing, the method doesn't care about winners, only numbers matched:ok Many winners go in and don't effect the fact that a profit was made during the running regardless.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices

Backtesting must work.............it just needs someone with time and effort to do it. I had hoped I showed in post #83 that it can be done.
I do remember that post and it did show it could be done. The problem is that we are talking about so many races, for example there are 27 tomorrow and that is without any evening racing. I don't believe anyone will sit through that amount of data to backtest and it is more realistic to test it for real.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices

The difference here though is that you are obviously laying more horses than just a single horse in a single race and this might yield a result that masks the underlying facts that longer odds happen more than the odds suggest. Which may be why it works for laying and would not work for backing. Thoughts?
But you forget one thing, the method doesn't care about winners, only numbers matched:ok Many winners go in and don't effect the fact that a profit was made during the running regardless.
I'm disagree that I forgot anything. You may have the perception that I am trying to knock what you are doing. Believe me I am not, just generating some debate on a Sunday night! As for backtesting....someone on here with demonstrable database skills will have the ability to do it en masse and provide a detailed answer, by track, by sp, by distance etc I would have thought. Yes my example was manual, more of a proof of concept than anything else. GL for the 27 races tomorrow.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices

I'm disagree that I forgot anything. You may have the perception that I am trying to knock what you are doing. Believe me I am not, just generating some debate on a Sunday night! As for backtesting....someone on here with demonstrable database skills will have the ability to do it en masse and provide a detailed answer, by track, by sp, by distance etc I would have thought. Yes my example was manual, more of a proof of concept than anything else. GL for the 27 races tomorrow.
Cheers:ok I don't think you're knocking and it's natural to be skeptical of anything so simple in nature but all I know at the moment is...what I'm doing is working. If there really is anybody out there with the time, skill and data necessary for such a mission....please knock yourself out. I'm using many hours just putting the damned bets on haha!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices That's pretty nice:ok One thing I have been doing however, that aldric certainly misunderstood, is laying to a set liability rather than backers stake. The whole thing is totally random and therefore to have more at risk on any one race is not logical. I'm guessing your data is probably to £2.00 backers stake than £2.00 liability.....which obviously makes a big difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices

That's pretty nice:ok One thing I have been doing however, that aldric certainly misunderstood, is laying to a set liability rather than backers stake. The whole thing is totally random and therefore to have more at risk on any one race is not logical. I'm guessing your data is probably to £2.00 backers stake than £2.00 liability.....which obviously makes a big difference.
okay, that changes things slightly and I agree with the reasons why. so................with £2 liability on any matched bet:
DATEPROFIT
16th Sep-£0.05
17th Sep£1.10
18th Sep£4.42
19th Sep£2.06
Definately flattens things on a day by day basis. It turns 17th Sep from a £7 loss into £1.10 profit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices

okay, that changes things slightly and I agree with the reasons why. so................with £2 liability on any matched bet:
DATEPROFIT
16th Sep-£0.05
17th Sep£1.10
18th Sep£4.42
19th Sep£2.06
Definately flattens things on a day by day basis. It turns 17th Sep from a £7 loss into £1.10 profit.
Works for me:ok Nice going mate:clap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices nice idea HG and best of luck with it. just wondered if gruss or the other betfair software sites would be capable of auto entering your bets..must be laborious on a Saturday with 35+ races. I see betrader mentioned , are you using this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices

okay, that changes things slightly and I agree with the reasons why. so................with £2 liability on any matched bet:
DATEPROFIT
16th Sep-£0.05
17th Sep£1.10
18th Sep£4.42
19th Sep£2.06
Definately flattens things on a day by day basis. It turns 17th Sep from a £7 loss into £1.10 profit.
Impressive work there Matthew :clap Its going to be interesting to see how this went today as I put a lay on the field in every race at 2.0 and its resulted in an unmitigating disaster.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices I'm at around £2.70 profit with one race to go on my normal £1 liability but it has been a struggle for most part. Favourites doing very well and not too many horses getting involved. Missed out on profiting in one race by finest of margin as price just didn't quite get there before favourite went in again! Overall though....it's another success and will make 6 days documented (7 counting my initial trial) profit:ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices

nice idea HG and best of luck with it. just wondered if gruss or the other betfair software sites would be capable of auto entering your bets..must be laborious on a Saturday with 35+ races. I see betrader mentioned , are you using this?
Yeah, using bettrader and thank the heavens for it haha! Also emailed them and they plan to implement some features will help no end.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices Excellent system gooner !! I ended up £15.73 up on lays of £2 backers stake. Fortunetly had day off to try it out, but will be working rest of week. does anyone now how early favourites odds compare to sp odds ? Don't know much about bots. How easy are they to set up ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: A look at the potential in laying the field at low prices

Why is that?
Because recording every 0.5 sec (aprox) the odds, i have min lay odds of 2.66 for the second fav (Hard Luck Story) and not 1.65 as your matched bet. Refresh rate needs lowering for more accurate data.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...