Is this chip dumping?

[robilaruk]

I don't understand the call at the end with no hand? and it was a deliberate call, it happened 2-3 secs after the action got to him, not him hitting the check tick box as the other guy was hitting the AI button? Damo ***** Hand 956174196 ***** 15.00/30.00 Texas Hold'em (No Limit ) - 15 February 2008 15:58:07 Holdem Speed (Real /Tournament ) Seat 1: PL_Damo (1500.00) Seat 2: evilwoman6 (1560.00) Seat 3: cseke001 (1140.00) Seat 4: møller (1470.00) Seat 5: Larson26 (1830.00) møller post SB 15.00 Larson26 post BB 30.00 ** Deal ** PL_Damo [5c, Ah] evilwoman6 [N/A, N/A] cseke001 [N/A, N/A] møller [N/A, N/A] Larson26 [N/A, N/A] *** Bet Round 1 *** PL_Damo Fold evilwoman6 Call 30.00 cseke001 Call 30.00 møller Raise to 150.00 Larson26 Fold evilwoman6 Fold cseke001 Call 150.00 *** Flop(Board): *** : [4s, 10d, 5d] *** Bet Round 2 *** møller Bet 150.00 cseke001 Raise to 420.00 møller Call 420.00 *** Turn(Board): *** : [4s, 10d, 5d, 4c] *** Bet Round 3 *** møller Check cseke001 Bet 240.00 møller Call 240.00 *** River(Board): *** : [4s, 10d, 5d, 4c, Js] *** Bet Round 4 *** møller Check cseke001 All-in 330.00 møller Call 330.00 *** Showdown *** : Rake: 0.00 Total Pot: 2340.00 PL_Damo Fold Win: 0.00 evilwoman6 Fold Win: 0.00 cseke001 [6c, 9d] Pair of fours , nine kicker Win: 2340.00 møller [2h, 6s] Pair of fours Win: 0.00 Larson26 Fold Win: 0.00

[ubermonkey1]

Re: Is this chip dumping? it certainly looks that way:@ either that or george bush has taken up poker. i would guess that a dominated hand would be perfect to chip dump with as its a very unlikely to win the hand outright ,so the money goes where they want it. the strange betting pattern looks like they are trying not to make it to obvious what they are doing ,but in the process actually make it more obvious . if they had gone all in pre flop you would have thought they were just nutters but their play here is only saying one thing ,and thats cheating. first the heavy raise to get rid of the players that are sandwiched between them and susequent call with 6 9os both look pretty wrong:eek. then 3 betting with 6 9 against a caller looks highly fishy the calls with 62 were pretty fishy (spose you could argue a straight draw but i cant really see that:() then the call on the river :Dwhat did he think the other guy had 2 3:lol definate collusion i think book em damo:dude