What Could He Possibly Have Had?

[Valiant23]

PokerStars Game #11042310134: Tournament #56000972, $3.00+$0.40 Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2007/07/20 - 17:26:12 (ET) Table '56000972 1' 10-max Seat #9 is the button Seat 1: nefnef (1598 in chips) Seat 2: oscar3498 (3331 in chips) Seat 3: darra 99 (156 in chips) Seat 4: nini153 (3180 in chips) Seat 6: twpb (2824 in chips) Seat 9: fuHBimallin (2886 in chips) Seat 10: Valiant23 (1025 in chips) Valiant23: posts small blind 75 nefnef: posts big blind 150 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Valiant23 [7h Kd] oscar3498: folds darra 99: raises 6 to 156 and is all-in nini153: folds twpb: folds fuHBimallin: folds Valiant23: folds nefnef: folds darra 99 collected 375 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 375 | Rake 0 Seat 1: nefnef (big blind) folded before Flop Seat 2: oscar3498 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 3: darra 99 collected (375) Seat 4: nini153 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 6: twpb folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 9: fuHBimallin (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 10: Valiant23 (small blind) folded before Flop 6 chips to win 381? :loon :loon :loon :loon :loon

[Nade]

Re: What Could He Possibly Have Had? :rollin

[aimar21]

Re: What Could He Possibly Have Had? I think it's a correct fold. His all-in screams Aces :rollin:rollin

[McG]

Re: What Could He Possibly Have Had? The BB probably just saw "all in" and thought "oo, I can't call that with this crap". Either that, or it's a classic case of collusion.

[Nade]

Re: What Could He Possibly Have Had?

The BB probably just saw "all in" and thought "oo' date=' I can't call that with this crap"..[/quote'] I did laugh, but this thought may be right! Just the other day i limped on PKR with J10 for 50c, somebody raised and because i only saw the players name highlighted in yellow symbolising they'd raised i assumed it was a big raise and folded as i wasn't watching too closely, it turned out the raise was only another 50c and i would have hit a full house! :lol So it is possible i guess..