RoyalLuck Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 (edited) Hello. I am new to the forum so hopefully this is allowed. I am trying to build a way to see what would have happened if a certain horse (based on past performance) had ran in a particular race (like a ghost race) I have two sets of data from 2 races and want to try and understand if Horse 1 would have beaten, or got beat by horse 2 if it had raced with horse 2 in their race. Race Comparison Distance Rounded Distance Actual Yards Weight Ground Seconds Horse 1 7f 6f 195yds 1515 9-10 Soft 91.35 Horse 2 8f 7f 173yds 1713 9-12 Good to Firm 97.62 I know I am going to have to make adjustments for weight, ground and distance but not sure how to calculate this without double counting? Or am I asking for the impossible here? 🙂 Edited June 27 by RoyalLuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zilzalian Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 20 minutes ago, RoyalLuck said: Hello. I am new to the forum so hopefully this is allowed. I am trying to build a way to see what would have happened if a certain horse (based on past performance) had ran in a particular race (like a ghost race) I have two sets of data from 2 races and want to try and understand if Horse 1 would have beaten, or got beat by horse 2 if it had raced with horse 2 in their race. Race Comparison Distance Rounded Distance Actual Yards Weight Ground Seconds Time Var Adjusted Time Horse 1 7f 6f 195yds 1515 9-10 Soft 91.35 6.55 84.80 Horse 2 8f 7f 173yds 1713 9-12 Good to Firm 97.62 0.52 97.10 I know I am going to have to make adjustments for weight, ground and distance but not sure how to calculate this without double counting? Or am I asking for the impossible here? 🙂 To simplify...From my point of view (speed figures) i would back the fastest horse 99% of the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalLuck Posted June 27 Author Share Posted June 27 4 minutes ago, Zilzalian said: To simplify...From my point of view (speed figures) i would back the fastest horse 99% of the time. So in the example who would be the fastest? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zilzalian Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 9 minutes ago, RoyalLuck said: So in the example who would be the fastest? Not sure why you edited the last bit out but IMO horse 1 would win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard-westwood Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 (edited) 2 hours ago, RoyalLuck said: Hello. I am new to the forum so hopefully this is allowed. I am trying to build a way to see what would have happened if a certain horse (based on past performance) had ran in a particular race (like a ghost race) I have two sets of data from 2 races and want to try and understand if Horse 1 would have beaten, or got beat by horse 2 if it had raced with horse 2 in their race. Race Comparison Distance Rounded Distance Actual Yards Weight Ground Seconds Horse 1 7f 6f 195yds 1515 9-10 Soft 91.35 Horse 2 8f 7f 173yds 1713 9-12 Good to Firm 97.62 I know I am going to have to make adjustments for weight, ground and distance but not sure how to calculate this without double counting? Or am I asking for the impossible here? 🙂 Hard to know exactly ....in general the going adjustment for soft could be anything from 0.5 sec/fur up to 1.0 sec or more ...so horseb1 .let's say it's 1 sec to adjust to good ground that would make the adjusted time 84.35 Horse 2 you would have a negative adjustment of anything from say 0.2 to 0.4 sec/furlong which you'd add to the time not subtract so adjusted time in theory could be 8 x 0.2 ...1.6 negative so adjusted time around 99 .22 Then if you adjust for distance .....horse 1 would cover 1515 / 84.35 = 18.176 yards/sec Horse 2 would cover 1713/99.22 = 17.26 yards /sec So In theory horse 1 would win ....but horse 2 if dropped back to 7f could run faster in theory so there wouldn't be much in it ...all depends on going adjustments ...if horse one only adjusted 0.5.secs /fur....say arguable 87.85 ....the sum would be 1515 /87.85=17.24 yards/sec so in theory ....a dead heat At equal weights horse 2 should in theory win ...literally comes down to the 2lb weight advantage for horse 2 at level weights Edited June 27 by richard-westwood Zilzalian 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalLuck Posted June 28 Author Share Posted June 28 22 hours ago, richard-westwood said: Hard to know exactly ....in general the going adjustment for soft could be anything from 0.5 sec/fur up to 1.0 sec or more ...so horseb1 .let's say it's 1 sec to adjust to good ground that would make the adjusted time 84.35 Horse 2 you would have a negative adjustment of anything from say 0.2 to 0.4 sec/furlong which you'd add to the time not subtract so adjusted time in theory could be 8 x 0.2 ...1.6 negative so adjusted time around 99 .22 Then if you adjust for distance .....horse 1 would cover 1515 / 84.35 = 18.176 yards/sec Horse 2 would cover 1713/99.22 = 17.26 yards /sec So In theory horse 1 would win ....but horse 2 if dropped back to 7f could run faster in theory so there wouldn't be much in it ...all depends on going adjustments ...if horse one only adjusted 0.5.secs /fur....say arguable 87.85 ....the sum would be 1515 /87.85=17.24 yards/sec so in theory ....a dead heat At equal weights horse 2 should in theory win ...literally comes down to the 2lb weight advantage for horse 2 at level weights Thank you so much for your explination. I was hoping to create a formula for this but I think there is too many variables, likely why such a thing doesnt currently exist and we all rely on speed rating data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.