-
Posts
1,107 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Everything posted by ian309
-
Division 2 - Season 1 Final Week 10 Selections
ian309 replied to avongirl's topic in Football Tipster Competition
Wolves (1) 1.95 Derby (1) 1.70 Salford (1) 2.0 £50 treble please -
How about we leave the start time at 8:10pm with 20 mins LR, but increase the starting stack to 5k for Weeks 1 and 2. That would allow you to reg prior to the start (or even the day before), and just join the game at whatever point you choose. Even if you joined as late as 9pm you'd still have about 30 bigs.
-
Northampton (1) 1.33 Bristol Rovers (1) 1.40 Notts County (1) 1.44 £10 treble please
-
There were just two of us left in the main LMS and I had Brighton, so they effectively cost me £125 with a shot at £250. I feel your pain
-
It was all going so well. All three teams winning, and Brighton 2-0 up at home after 85 mins against a team that has taken just one point from 24 all season. You couldn't make it up
-
Brighton (1) 1.61 Brentford (1) 1.70 Sunderland (1) 1.57 £15 treble please
-
-
Not a typical Super Flop in itself, but in the context of the tourney, the flopped set-over-set was pivotal.
-
Man City (2) 1.33 Wigan (2) 2.30 Doncaster (2) 2.30 £10 treble please
-
Last Man Standing 1 - Week 7 (Deadline 3pm Saturday Oct 5th)
ian309 replied to Fader's topic in Last Man Standing Competition
No worries mate, best of luck -
Last Man Standing 1 - Week 7 (Deadline 3pm Saturday Oct 5th)
ian309 replied to Fader's topic in Last Man Standing Competition
@chillymonster @Gazza's United I still think 33% of something (£83.33) is better than 100% of nothing tbh Chillymonster and Gazza, let me know what you think, no pressure. -
Last Man Standing 1 - Week 7 (Deadline 3pm Saturday Oct 5th)
ian309 replied to Fader's topic in Last Man Standing Competition
@Fader @chillymonster @Gazza's United Hi Guys, As a long time poker player who is accustomed to making Final Table deals, here's a proposal for you. How about the three of us take £50 each, but still play on with the extra £100 going to the eventual winner ? After all, 33% of something is better than 100% of nothing Obviously we can only do this if a) Everyone agrees to it, and b) If the rules allow it, although I can't see anything in the rules which forbids it. If either of you wants to play on for winner-takes-all that's also fine by me.