Jump to content

Hellmuth Punished for Slow Roll


morlspin

Recommended Posts

Re: Hellmuth Punished for Slow Roll Some cracking lines in that :rollin I particularly like the way it was Hellmuth who suggested that they run it 3 or 4 times - he clearly felt that he was providing some sort of insurance, just in case the guy was lucky once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Hellmuth Punished for Slow Roll I don't like Phil Hellmuth, but this is really wrong. Phil offered the guy to draw 4 times, knowing he had an enormous advantage - that in itself is very generous, and Phil is giving away money there. Then everyone is cheering and laughing when the unlikely is happening, what a mob. Total disgrace, Phil didn't deserve that As a side note, the rookie behaved like he actually had a lock hand with pocket kings on a 9T9 flop when some other guy is 3-shoving. Come on. :eyes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Hellmuth Punished for Slow Roll Just seen this. How can anybody call it a slowroll. Not a great fan of Helmuth, but to suggest as laak and tony G did that he was slow rolling is nonsense. With that hand I would have thought i could be loosing to 10's full. As soon as the other guy moved all in Helmuth snap called. Don't understand why he give the option to draw 4 times. Not a smart move

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Hellmuth Punished for Slow Roll

Phil offered the guy to draw 4 times, knowing he had an enormous advantage - that in itself is very generous, and Phil is giving away money there.
Don't understand why he give the option to draw 4 times. Not a smart move
How is he giving away money? Running it more than once gives you exactly the same average win/loss as running it once, but reduces your variance. By the way, I agree that it didn't look like much of a slow roll.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Hellmuth Punished for Slow Roll

How is he giving away money? Running it more than once gives you exactly the same average win/loss as running it once' date= but reduces your variance.
Your'e right slap, i had my head up my arse when i wrote it :lol What i meant was that Phil should not be interested in giving the rookie low variance. - Phil's aim is to bust him (and every other player at the table) - Phil does not care about high or low variance, since they are, for him, playing for peanuts. - The higher variance, the more likely the rookie will bust quickly So, Phil wants high variance, and should not offer him to draw more than once
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...