Rush hand

[Paul176]

So I just had a 200 hand or so play around on Rush. Bit hard to make any conclusions but it seems to play more aggro postflop than I would expect from 5NL. Maybe someone who has played more hands can confirm/disagree with that? Thought I'd add a reasonably standard yet interesting situation for a bit more content. Villain is unknown so I'm not sure a 3bet pre is going to get much value from worse so I flat. Then villain cbets - most villains are cbetting 100% here. Even against UTG I think we've got too much equity to fold? So call or raise and why? Full Tilt Poker $5.00 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com UTG: $5.00 MP: $3.58 CO: $5.49 BTN: $3.76 SB: $2.92 Hero (BB): $13.45 Pre Flop: ($0.07) Hero is BB with :Qh: :Ah: UTG raises to $0.15, 4 folds, Hero calls $0.10 Flop: ($0.32) :Kd: :4d: :Ts: (2 players) Hero checks, UTG bets $0.20

[GaF]

Re: Rush hand I'm looking at this situation for the benchmarkers in NL10 rush. I've applied the following filters in HEM: NL10 Rush - 6-max Postion: Big Blind Facing: 1 Raiser Position of first Raiser: UTG Preflop action: Call Flop Actions: Check (just Check first and then all of them after) Players on Flop: 2 Popeye: Villain cbets 22 out of 26 times Charlie Brown: Villain cbets 13 out of 20 times Eeyore: Villain cbets 8 out of 9 times Combined: Villain cbets 43 out of 55 times I wasn't convinced that the villain cbets as often as you thought - but they definitely cbet more often than I expected :ok