Money Won at Showdown v Money won without showdown

[GaF]

There are graphs in PT3 and one of them is as below: Just trying to get my head around what it means, and I think it may have just "clicked" - if I'm right then it's a pretty significant graph to utilise. My thinking is that if you are playing perfectly, then you should win the same amount of money with a showdown, as you do without a showdown. If you win more with a showdown than without, it means that you fold too often and dont go to showdown often enough. If you win more without a showdown, than with a showdown, then it means that you dont fold often enough and should go to showdown less often. I cant quite think through fully why I think that should be the case - "I just do", it seems right. But because I cant really understand myself why I think it, I cannot explain it or justify it (and so could also be totally wrong). Any thoughts on the theory?

[GaF]

Re: Money Won at Showdown v Money won without showdown Found a couple of threads on twoplustwo - but not sure what they mean to my hypothesis.... http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/114/pokertracker/analyzing-my-money-won-showdown-non-showdown-graphs-396584/ http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/114/pokertracker/money-won-without-showdown-graph-question-214815/