Using best priced bookies for 'inside info'

[fintron]

Do certain odds compilers have a better idea of a horses chances on a given day than their counterparts at rival bookmakers? Do those laying at the biggest price do so because they are simply trying at attract custom or because they genuinely have a good grasp on that stables runners and know where they stand with them. Conversely, if they do have a good grasp of a certain yard, when they go best priced about an animal are their fears justified? I don't back horses just because of the trainer, although I do regularly back from certain yards, so am going to have a little look at this. Has anyone done anything similar in the past? Kevin Ryan Mutamared. Best priced 2/1 Betfred first show. SJ went 5/4. Bet 365 little less confident of his chances, 13/8. Northern Desert. Betfred 7/1 about him first show. Stan James went 9/2 first show. So SJ look to be fearing the Ryan-Spencer combo more than the odds compiler at Betfred today. Paul Howling Stand Guard. Opened 7/2 Bet 365 last night. Mostly 3's across the board with morning but Laddies and SJ stuck their necks out and were laying him off at 10/3.

[Gingertipster]

Re: Using best priced bookies for 'inside info' Mike Dillon of Ladbrokes seems to know a lot about the Coolmoore boys and Jonjo's. When Laddies are short about one of theirs it is a good sign. When they are top price be careful. Am sure there are others but would not want to over-do the thing. Bookies still have insiders in yards (lads) who tell them what is going on.