Jump to content

NFL Wk. 2.


TazaD

Recommended Posts

4-2 (+1.87) Right...firstly I'll say that I won't actually be placing any of these bets just yet...unless it looks likely that there will be a decent line change. Secondly, I'm scared stiff!! Big favs are generally not the way to the gold house or a rocket car in this league, but at this stage I'll be laying roughly 59 points!!! :unsure (give or take one or two :D ) Everyone loves a good trend, so here goes... Since '89 League: 2-15 ats (Av. loss 20.4!) away 10+ dog, off any ats loss as a home fav of 3 or less, if this weeks opp was last away. [Cleveland & Tenn] (0-3 last season; SL 28-45 Indi @ +13.5, Jets 3-16 NE @ +10, Oak 3-22 Denv @ +13) Basically, these 2 teams are every bit as bad as they looked this week, and SD/Cinci (happy to be back home it seems) really should be able to run away with big wins. They wil need to of course, given the -10/-10.5 spreads, but I think I'd take both up to 14! As expected Cleveland didn't fire a shot on the weekend. Frye was hurried all day, was sacked 14 times!!...threw for just 4.9 y/p with 2 picks. The running game produced just 41 yards in 13 attempts (minus scrambles), and that was against a below par NO D. Cinci's main concern is their pass D, but I just don't think Frye will have the protection/time/options (Jurevicius out now too) or talent to take advantage. Rudi Johnson will have another massive day given the Browns allowed 150 yards rushing and Palmer will have multiple options (the Housh should be back) Cleveland do have a very good recent record @ Cinci, but I just can't see them being able to score enough to keep it close. Same goes for the Titans. No stability @ QB at all. A rookie and a guy still learning the system who has been a bust for the last few years anyway! Against this hungry SD defense it will be a long and ugly day I suspect. SD's running game will be outstanding all year, and Rivers definately showed enough today to suggest he can make big throws when necessary. Add that the Chargers are 14-3-1 last 18 v. losing teams, and we should have another blow-out. League: 10-1 (Av. win 15.4) home 7+ fav on a Sunday off a Thursday game. [Miami] 8-0 (av. win 18.3!) if they were away. Seems that when a team gets a few extra days to plan/rest up for a game against a team they "should" beat, they make sure they do! Buffalo only scored 10 points after the opening fumble return, and managed just 12 FD's for the game, and I think Miami's D is better still. The 'Phins should be able to get something going on the ground this week to take the pressure of Culpepper, so he can manage the game, rather than trying to make big plays and forcing poor throws. Miami won the home meeting last year 24-23, but Buff were 14-0 up within 5 minutes after burning Miami deep for 46 and 54 yard TD passes very early. I'm expecting Miami to be a lot more focussed this time, and these are the games they have to win since they consider themselves a genuine play-off team this year. League: 10-4 (12-2 this no...av. win 20.4!!) home 7+ fav, off a 21+ ats win as away fav of 7 or less, if opp was last a 'dog. [Chic] (1-1 last season; Sea 41-3 SF as -16, Pits 35-21 Det as -16) League: 1-12-3 (1-15 this no!...Av. loss 22.1!!) away 7+ dog, off any ats win as home dog, if opp won by at least 7 ats as any away fav. [Det] (0-1 in 2005; Jets 3-30 Caro as +9) ...there's 2 common games in those trends, so combined that is a 25-3 ats (at this number) system!! Effectively both say the same thing. Chicago are playing very well, winning big as an away fav, and the line is too low because Det performed above expectations, but they are still rubbish, as witnessed by them being a home dog in the first place. Grossman threw for over 10 y/p, the running gme was solid, the defense always solid...The Lions are still very much rebuilding and will struggle, esp. on the road this season. Specifically, in this game I doubt if they will have any success on the ground at all (they had just 39 rushing yards last week), which will inevitably lead to a pick or 2, or 3. ...oh, and anyone who doesn't believe things aren't quite right in the Lions camp....Marinelli spent the previous 10 seasons coaching Tampa Bay's defensive line and coached the unit in place of Joe Cullen, who was arrested twice recently on suspicion of drunken driving and because police say he was driving nude. Cullen will be back to coach in the next game at Chicago, Marinelli said. :unsure I rest my case. League: 10-1 (Av. win 20.2) home 10+ fav, off any ats win as away fav of 3 or less, if opp is off a 7+ ats loss. [indi] (2-0 last season; Den 27-0 Jets as -13, SD 34-10 Oak as -11) League: 1-8 (Av. loss 24.9!) away 10+ dog, off a 7+ ats loss as a home dog, if total is >44.5. [Houston] Again, 1 common game here, so a combined 17-2 trend. Probably my least favourite pick of the week. It's tough taking Indi as a big fav when they will have one of the most negative rushing differentials this season...but, having said that, they did play the Giants who are one of the very best running teams...and also it didn't matter! :wall Pretty strong trend, saying that Indi did the job last week, and should go on their merry way playing a crap team at home who under performed last week anyway...and the high total shows what we already know, that Houston's D is crap. McNabb 300+ yards, 3 TD's...over 5 y/r, so Manning will have fun, and hopefully they can get something going on the ground. One thing Indi's D is good at is rushing the passer, and Carr was sacked 5 times last week, and continues to throw poor balls and make bad decisions under pressure. Indi dominated the meeting last year...won by just 14, but fumbled twice. They had 26-11 FD's and 419-209 yards...besides, 14 will do the trick here anyway. ;) League: 18-1-1!! (Av. WIN 6.4...16.4 SU!!) home dog of 3 or less, off a SU win of 3 or less as an away dog of <7. [Min] 10-0 (9-1 SU!!...Av. WIN 10.9!!) if the total is <40. I can't really understand why Carolina are favs in this game anyway? Coming off a terrible performance, getting completely out-played at home, are people banking on the 'bounce-back' factor here?? :\ Delhomme threw for just 4.7 y/p and was sacked 4 times...which isn't likely to improve in a hurry, given their starting left guard is now out for the season. I know Minni are learning a new system and aren't the greatest of teams themselves, but they do have a solid running game, Brad Johnson doesn't make mistakes and can make a big play when needed, and their defense looks to have improved significantly. I don't think they deserve to be home dogs here...hopefully a +3 will be available somewhere...but very tempted by the ML as it is. :ok League: 3-9 (1-11 this no...av. loss 18.2) away 10+ dog off a 10+ ats home loss, if opp is also off a 10+ ats loss. [KC] Basically says that they are crap and the line is too low because of Denver's (non!) performance last week....and I agree. KC are about the worst team in football right now! A makeshift o-line in progress, a terrible defense and now a no. 2 QB....and bascially Denver moved the ball easily enough, but turned it over 5 times. They won't have to worry about Plummer throwing it away this week, because he might not have to throw it at all! The Broncos ran for 161 yards @ 6.4 y/r! But 2 early fumbles lead to Jake playing catch-up and forcing silly throws. If they protect the ball this week, they should be able to run up a big enough score to cover the -10 easily. They've won the last 5 home meetings by an av. of 13.8 ppg, inc. a 20 point win last year. So there we go...looking at 6 very big favs and a small home dog. No totals really interest me this week, although I suspect Minni/Carolina under 38 looks pretty solid. The good news about taking the big favs this week, is that only 2 of them appear to be big public plays...Cinci and Indi both getting over 70% of the action early....so I might go ahead and play them early on, esp. Indi to get them below 14. Surprisingly Denver getting less than 50%!!...but again, I suspect that will change closer to game time when people finally realise that Green is out. I wouldn't mind getting them at -10, so will take that if I find it early. :ok Think I'm just about typed out now... ...oh, but since we want people with senses of humour here... How do you pick out a blind man in a nudist colony?...It's not hard. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: NFL Wk. 2. Lines from USa as of 11.20PM BST Oakland getting 11 points headstart..god damn....

NFL FOOTBALL - WEEK 2 Sunday, September 17th
TimeGm #TeamScoreOpenerCRISThe GreekWWTSSportsbookJazz
09/17 10:00a401 402 OAKLAND BALTIMORE
36 10½ 34 12 34 11 34 11½ 35 11
09/17 10:00a403 404 HOUSTON TEXANS INDIANAPOLIS
47 13½ 47 13 47 13 47 13 47 13½ 47 13½-05
09/17 10:00a405 406 CLEVELAND CINCINNATI
42 11 42 10 42½ 10½-05 42 10½ 42 10½ 42 10½
09/17 10:00a407 408 BUFFALO MIAMI
37 7 37 6½ 37 7-05 37 6½ 37 6½ 37 6
09/17 10:00a409 410 DETROIT CHICAGO
32 8½ 32 9 32 8½ 32 8½ 32 8½ 32 9
09/17 10:00a411 412 CAROLINA MINNESOTA
2½ 38 2 37½ 2½-05 37½ 2 37½ 2 38
09/17 10:00a413 414 NY GIANTS PHILADELPHIA
42 3½ 43 3 42 3-15 42 3-15 42 3 42 3 -15
09/17 10:00a415 416 TAMPA BAY ATLANTA
36 5½ 35 5½ 36½ 5½ 36 5½ 36 5½ 36 5½
09/17 10:00a417 418 NEW ORLEANS GREEN BAY
36½ 1 2 37½ 2 37½ 2 38 2 38½ 1½ 38
09/17 1:05p419 420 ST. LOUIS SAN FRANCISCO
3-20 44 3-05 44 3-05 44 3 44 3 44½ 3 44
09/17 1:05p421 422 ARIZONA SEATTLE
47 6½ 47 7 47 7-05 47 7 47 7 47 7
09/17 1:15p423 424 NEW ENGLAND NY JETS
4½ 37½ 5½ 36½ 6 37 6 37 6 37 6 -05 37
09/17 1:15p425 426 TENNESSEE SAN DIEGO
40 11 38 11½ 38½ 11½-05 38½ 11½ 38½ 12
09/17 1:15p427 428 KANSAS CITY DENVER
43 8 40 11 40½ 10½ 40 10½ 40½ 11 40 11
09/17 5:15p429 430 WASHINGTON DALLAS
37 6½ 37 5½ 37u15 5½ 37 5½ 37 5½
NFL FOOTBALL - WEEK 2 Monday, September 18th
TimeGm #TeamScoreOpenerCRISThe GreekWWTSSportsbookJazz
09/18 5:30p431 432 PITTSBURGH JACKSONVILLE
pk 36½ pk 36½ 37u15 1-05 pk 36½ 1 36½ 36½ pk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread has more posts. To see them, you'll need to sign up or sign in.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...