Jump to content

MrJol

Regular Members
  • Posts

    2,352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by MrJol

  1. 16 hours ago, bymatrix said:

    Difficult to think of anything to add to what's already been proposed.

    Only other one i had was to cap the price of the winner , anyone's guess what that would be but say for example 12/1 may be the ballpark.

    That way it would cut out the flukier wins , force leaders to play more frequent and not sit on lead as much , force chasers to catch the leader or top 4 earlier rather than sit until very late , so instead of a 50/1 final day selection they'd need a 12/1 winner on each of the final 4 days and let's face it if that was achieved they'd deserve it anyway and their strike rate would be far more meritorious.

    Great site whatever the rules anyway and sure we're all eternally grateful for the variety of competitions and also the tireless work from Graham.       :cheers

     

    If this was to happen then surely you wouldn't get people picking the outsiders? if I new a 20/1 shot would be capped at 12/1 I wouldn't pick it.

     

  2. 8 hours ago, BillyHills said:

     

    If we cant decide I quite like the amount of winners and then if its level we go to S/R.

    :ok

     

    Actually thought this way would be good for a while, would save me looking for a long shot all the time lol

    people pick the long shots because they are trying to win the competition, it's the only prize on offer so you want to try and win it. If your £30 behind it's no good picking a 7/4 shot is it :p

    Personally I would try and get the most winners, you can't beat the feeling of picking winners :ok

×
×
  • Create New...