JJvsQJ 1st hand SnG

[kef4o]

I understand the critics about the QJ calling the all-in. But what would you do with the JJ? Taking into consideration that it is nailed on the QJ is calling I would also go all-in with that. It is a SnG with a small fee... So is it really a bad decision? This guy talks about how the QJ would call with AQ or better. There are people calling situations like these with 74s. I realistically would expect an Ace but still an Ace is not a made hand, whereas JJ is. Also any pair would mean a call aswell.

[SKVilla]

Re: JJvsQJ 1st hand SnG I'd have raised the min raise to 210 and if the clown is stupid enough to call and the flop came down 9 high like it did then I'd make an oversized pot bet of about 600 and give him a chance to hang himself. If you believe he has Q's, K's or Aces then you don't need to go broke on Jacks. I've folded Jacks many times pre-flop when I don't trust my read on an opponent and I've seen Jacks v Aces so many times that I'm always wary of it on tourneys.