Jump to content
** April Poker League Result : 1st Like2Fish, 2nd McG, 3rd andybell666 **

Tennis: The value in Qualifiers


Recommended Posts

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers

Metz 1st Round: SAULNIER v Hrbaty @ 4.05 Pinnacle.....WON ASCIONE v Fish @ 3.25 Bluesq.............LOST CLEMENS v Patience @ 1.73 Pinnacle.......UP 4-3 1st set (STAKHOVSKY v Gasquet @ 9.0 Pinnacle)... Missed the start of the first one.
Im off to bed .............good punting
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 542
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers the 2 victorious 1st round qualifiers from Metz meet in the 2nd round so no more selections for this week. quick round up: ATP Tokyo 1st Round: TROICKI v Vicente @ 2.07 Pinnacle WON CHAEN v Waske @ 4.45 Pinnacle LOST CILIC v Udomchoke @ 2.35 Pinnacle LOST ARTHURS v Burgsmuller @ 1.67 Ladbrokes LOST LU v Delgado @ 2.31 Pinnacle WON CHEN v Iwabuchi @ 2.38 SportingOdds LOST Metz 1st Round: SAULNIER v Hrbaty @ 4.05 Pinnacle WON ASCIONE v Fish @ 3.25 Bluesq LOST CLEMENS v Patience @ 1.73 Pinnacle WON

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers Just a quick question. I have been watching this thread for some while now and think that if a selective staking plan had been used in relation to the odds on offer, winnings would have been increased quite considerably. I'm no expert at doing spread sheets and working out results / profit etc over a period of time but was wondering if any of you that are expert on this type of thing could calculate some figures for this year to date on all selections in both 1st and 2nd rounds, separately and combined using the following staking system Odds available / Stake less than evens (2.0) 7 pts evens to 2/1 (2.0 to 3.0) 5pts 2/1 to 3/1 (3.0 to 4.0) 3pts 3/1 to 5/1 (4.0 to 6.0) 2pts over 5/1 (6.0) 1 pt............with no high price limit Hope this is possible. Also would it be more profitable tweaking the stakes somewhat but keeping to the same odds brackets. I look forward to your response. By the way any news on Mr I.:eek

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers I don't have up to date figures as i have been working away and missed many selections in the last few months but I analysed Mr I's results between 15 Jan 2006 and 17 May 2006. If you read back through the thread you'll see that Mr I uses 2pt fixed profit/variable stakes and only bets if the prices are below 5.00. I also looked at what happened when there was no cut off at 5.00. In other words providing it was a qualifier you backed it whatever the price. I also looked at what happened to the figures using 1pt level stakes. 1PT LEVEL STAKE 1ST ROUND (Ex big prices over 5) Bets/outlay: 104 p/l: 31.66 yield 30.44% 1ST ROUND (Inc big prices) Bets/outlay:118 p/l: 44.66 yield 37.84% 2ND ROUND (Ex big prices) Bets/outlay:46 p/l: 4.46 yield: 9.7 2ND ROUND (Inc big prices) Bets/outlay: 55 p/l: 18.42 yield 33.49% COMBINED 1ST AND 2ND (Inc big prices) Bets/outlay: 173 p/l: 63.08 yield 36.46% 2 PT LEVEL PROFIT These are the equivalent yields for the stakes Mr I uses. 1ST ROUND (Ex big prices): 21.29%, 1ST ROUND (Inc big prices): 24.99% 2ND ROUND (Ex big prices): 8.95% 2ND ROUND (Inc big prices): 17.09% COMBINED 1ST AND 2ND (Inc big prices): 22.87% This only goes for the first 5 months of course but up to then including the big prices and keeping to level stakes came out on top. I don't know the detailed effect of your variable staking suggestions, eddiem, but my hunch is that it would come out pretty similar to Mr I's fixed profit method. Nearly always the qualifiers are priced as the underdogs. What Mr I has so cleverly observed is that they are unfavourably priced up given that they have the advantage of having played a couple of matches usually on the courts before the regular guys get there. That's the edge Mr I has discovered. Maybe someone else has some more recent figures. No I do not know what has happened to Mr I. I emailed his personal address a while back and got no reply. I also asked the moderators of this site if they knew anything but I got no response from them. Does anyone have any news? It would be very good to know. Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers no problem. awful week so far with just kubot winning. hopefully tomorrow will be better: ATP Moscow 1st Round: ISTOMIN v Korolev @ 4.1 Pinnacle *KRAVCHUK v Lee @ 4.5 Coral (STAKHOVSKY v Tursunov @ 10.0 Pinnacle) ATP Stockholm 1st Round: LLODRA v Nieminen @ 3.05 Pinnacle * - looks quite dodgy. most bookies have removed it. lee drifting on betfair although there hasn't been much traded yet. should probably move quickly if you fancy backing the qualifier here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers Kravchuk won after being backed into favourite before the match. Looked dodgy as hell. Hope some of you got on early. Amazingly, Stakhovsky also came through at 10.0. Great day for fixed stakes taking all prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers Followed the Stakhovsky game "live" on the Betfair forums and a lot of p***ed off punters were smelling a rat. Think some of them had their fingers burned on Lee-Kravchuk earlier in the day. The in-play prices on the Stakhovsky game were mad though - price on Tursonov never went over 1.9 until Match Point. :loon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers

The in-play prices on the Stakhovsky game were mad though - price on Tursonov never went over 1.9 until Match Point. :loon
I have writen before on another thread that the best in-play opportunities are found in tennis, especially in women's tennis. I do believe there are really a lot of 1.05 or lower odds losers in tennis in-play, and as you said 1.9 until a match point is nuts. Great thread as always, I am only sorry that it died out a little, so I didn't back these this time. I would certainly be on the 10.0 bet, I have won some nice games in the past at these "long" odds. Good Luck everyone Pinho
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers 1st round summary: ATP Vienna 1st Round: KUBOT v Grosjean @ 4.89 Pinnacle WON CILIC v Wawrinka @ 3.32 Pinnacle LOST BOLELLI v Hrbaty @ 3.75 Pinnacle LOST (FALLA v Gasquet @ 7.0 Skybet) LOST ATP Stockholm 1st Round: MARRAY v Gicquel @ 3.5 Betfred LOST DEVILDER v Vinciguerra @ 2.63 Betfred LOST WESSELS v Bjorkman @ 2.38 Betfred LOST LLODRA v Nieminen @ 3.05 Pinnacle LOST ATP Moscow 1st Round: ZVEREV v Clement @ 2.75 Skybet LOST ISTOMIN v Korolev @ 4.1 Pinnacle LOST KRAVCHUK v Lee @ 4.5 Coral WON (STAKHOVSKY v Tursunov @ 10.0 Pinnacle) WON

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers ATP Moscow 2nd Round: STAKHOVSKY v Clement @ 2.75 bet365 KRAVCHUK v Santoro @ 4.56 Pinnacle ATP Vienna 2nd Round: KUBOT v Melzer @ 4.5 bet365 I'm putting these up now because I'm not sure if I'll be around tomorrow. Only bet365 have prices up for 2 of them. There should be much better available in the morning. The price on Stakhovsky looks particularly crap. Someone else can update tomorrow if the prices are much better....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers

ATP Moscow 2nd Round: STAKHOVSKY v Clement @ 2.75 bet365 KRAVCHUK v Santoro @ 4.56 Pinnacle ATP Vienna 2nd Round: KUBOT v Melzer @ 4.5 bet365 I'm putting these up now because I'm not sure if I'll be around tomorrow. Only bet365 have prices up for 2 of them. There should be much better available in the morning. The price on Stakhovsky looks particularly crap. Someone else can update tomorrow if the prices are much better....
STAKHOVSKY v Clement @ 3.25 BetFair[url=http://www.punterslounge.com/forum/autolink.php?id=34&script=showthread&forumid=21]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers ATP Madrid Qualifiers: Fraile Fish Del Potro Navarro-Pastor Falla Benneteau 1st Round (Monday): FRAILE v Srichaphan FISH v Malisse NAVARRO-PASTOR v Murray No prices yet. Falla and Benneteau meet so no play there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tennis: The value in Qualifiers ATP Madrid 2nd Rnd: FISH v Nadal 8 BetFair Wouldn't qualify for MR I's system due to the odds, but I know some of yous were considering backing all Qualifiers in both rnds. Not sure how wise it is against Nadal though! Unlucky for anyone who was on Benneteau yesterday - 5-2 up in the 3rd and lost 5 straight games to throw away a nice meaty profit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...