Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Do not forget about Adamek and Chambers. As I realized the opinions of this fight in the internet differ: generally Poles think that Adamek should win this fight easily while Americans claim that Chambers will beat his opponent. Chambers is faster but Adamek seems to be a more comprehensive fighter for me. We must remember that Chambers is younger (as far as remember 5 years) while Adamek will probably reach his past-prime soon. Polish fighter is probably more 'utilized' after some brutal fights (especially with Paul Briggs and Vitali Klitschko). Yes, there was a KO on Chambers by Wladimir - but Adamek fought some even harder fights. I think 2.8 for Chambers is worth trying. What do you think? Paul - I will join superfoo and mowgli77 - could we have a separate forum for boxing?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...