Comparing Systems

[bairn1]

Hi there, I was just wondering what people's thoughts were on comparing betting systems. i.e. If you've got a few systems which produce different ROIs, different number of bets, etc. do you have an easy way to tell which is best? I know a lot is down to personal preference (e.g. how risk averse you are), but say you have three systems that show up the following results on back-testing. Which would you say is best and why? System 1 113 bets £479 profit to £10 level stakes ROI = 42% Avg Odds = 2.87 Strike Rate = 51% System 2 763 bets £1,506 profit to £10 level stakes ROI = 20% Avg Odds = 3.3 Strike Rate = 36% System 3 259 bets £730 profit to £10 level stakes ROI = 28% Avg Odds = 3.46 Strike Rate = 30% I'm guessing there's no particular best / worst out of these, but I'd be interested to hear a few opinions of which they prefer and why. Many thanks.

[winningbin]

Re: Comparing Systems That was also my question ! ;) I will choose System 2, why ? Because there are up to 763 bets and I believe that more bets will show more exact system. At System 1, just 113 bets, and I am not sure that it can bring the high Strike Rate in future. In System 2, I guess the amount of matches is enough (and better than others) to ensure a system run well ! :ok