lelit

@Four-leaf You must count on some otherworldly influences counting on Gauff; so far she is losing 1:9. She still has deficiencies in her tennis skills. Rybakina, Ostapenko (if she qualifies for the match) and Sabalenka can beat Iga, but the unknown is certainly Osaka, who was unrivaled while being mentally healthy.

Does your system pay attention to player injuries? Willingness to be ready for Wimbledon in a moment? Ostapenko had serious calf problems yesterday, limping for 1.5 sets. Tsurenko retired twice in the last 4 matches.

Big surprises? This happens every year at the WTA tournaments in Europe just before the season in America. As a rule, a lot of WTA players do not pay much attention to these tournaments. Every experienced tipster knows it.

This thread should be called Neil's blog Thread, where the author lists the names of tennis players who have unexpectedly failed him and there are recently, plenty of them ?

It would take hours of research to figure out the total odds of Torques today's investment, but he is an experienced investor

Torque, I am afraid that it would be much more rational to play that each of them will win at least one set - 1.58 BF.

You have high expectations of a player who won 37 matches and 6 big tournaments in turn. None of the players you mentioned were near this one.

The reason for Iga's poor performance was the lack of technique / skills in playing without topspin on the grass; this should be trained and assimilated, among others, in pre-Wimbledon tournaments. She had neither the time nor the energie for this after such an excellent but exhausting season. So the question is: why did she go to this tournament? Iga's power is based on fast-played, incredibly intense topspin, so all opponents often have big problems with positioning for the optimal pickup of the ball. Her second serve without topspin is unfortunately, useless.

You can find the definition of value bet on google. Some years ago I found a reputable Australian website whose owners had some computer systems that determines value bet. They have had many years of progress. The subscription was quite expensive. Later I wrote privately with one of the employees, he knew little about tennis but a lot of computer processing of the results @Raduvlad1995 Remember we are members of the discussion forum where you can see many different discussions. Save yourself the phrases: "people like you"....

I didn't suggest anything about you, no need for your manipulation. It was about only mine mental state and I don't care about your winning or loses. Value bets? It's where your percentage predictions of the match result meet the wrong bookmakers price.

I treat tennis betting as entertainment, I bet low stakes, usually doubles, often on WTA and very often 3 set score. My tips must have some value; never bet like you. I have a positive balance sheet; did not transfer money to any of bookmaker in more than 2 years. I don't plan on getting rich through betting or gambling, I take care of my mental state I have watched several betting forums, in some of them with participation of true experts, but have never met anyone who promoted your style of betting. If you ask any bettor, he is regularly winning money

Almost with surprise and compassion I watch tipsters betting several legged matches with very small odds. How long does it take to recover with just one missed match? Later we are witnesses of the lamentation of these heroic investors