superlee
Regular Members-
Posts
21 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
superlee's Achievements
-
MCLARKE reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
superlee reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
harry_rag reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
superlee reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
superlee reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
superlee reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
superlee reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
superlee reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
superlee reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
superlee reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
superlee reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
Fader reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
MCLARKE reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
superlee reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
Zilzalian reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
harry_rag reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
MCLARKE reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
harry_rag reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
MCLARKE reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
its like anyone who doesnt physically talk to a person/client can make things incredibly difficult. I'm 99% sure so people get so angry and they hope that you give up and you can save the company money because people can easily hide behind online chat and emails and avoid the difficulty and potential costly side of actually answering a hard questions. I can tell you now this is done by nearly all companies and increasingly the govt...i can list many e.g.s virgin media, dwp, airlines. it wasnt long ago b365 had an amazing service on the phone and were delightful at resolving queries. post covid everyone seems to be making any service issues automated (AI) or delivering it from abroad with poor english and no personal responsiblity of resolving things...ok rant over and yes b365 are making me mad and tired so they get their way as is it worth pursing after the hours i have spent here talking to you knowledgeable, friendly guys and and with them - a faceless corporate that refuses to read emails or chooses to ignore them. btw I found in the past they (b365 and others) build those bet calculators so it works in their favour so beware!!
-
and to prove my last point another duplicate reply: Thank you for contacting us back in regards to your bet XD4383654951I. I completely appreciate that it'll be disappointing that your bet hadn't returned as much as you were expecting. From reviewing the thread so far I can see that it has been advised that the settlement of the bet is correct based on the Rule 4 of 45p in the .20 Goodwood (RACE 2) 03/09/2024. To answer your query, any race that is less than 5 runners, the place money is invested to Win. https://help.bet365.com/product-help/sports/rules/horseracing I can see from our audits that the Rule 4 of 45p was applied to all bets placed pre 8:38:11 UK on 03/09. I appreciate that this is not the outcome you were hoping for however rest assured your bet has been settled correctly. Kind regards, Regan W The bet365 Team
-
reply just now: "We have further raised this with my superior who is happy with the settlement of this bet. I am happy to through your bet with you. Please see your bet as per below; Almaty Star 2.20 Goodwood (RACE 2) 03/09/2024 Win and Each Way 15.00 Won (3 Places 1/5 Odds) Rule 4: 45p Leyhaimur 3.30 Goodwood (RACE 4) 03/09/2024 Win and Each Way 10.00 Won (3 Places 1/5 Odds) Sunny Street 5.25 Southwell (RACE 5) 03/09/2024 Win and Each Way 17.00 Lost (2 Places 1/4 Odds) Bet Type: E/W Trixie Return £188.23 As you can see from the first selection, this has a Rule 4 of 45p. When bookmakers offer odds on an event, they do so expecting all participants to take part. When a participant is withdrawn from an event a Rule 4 deduction is applied to all bets placed before the withdrawal, to reflect the reduced amount of competitors. Due to Ancient Times (unsuitable ground), Night On Earth (unsuitable ground), Skallywag Bay (unsuitable ground) being non-runners in the Almaty Star 2.20 Goodwood (RACE 2) 03/09/2024 this had led to this Rule 4 being applied, further reducing your Returns. You can review the Results of this race here; https://www.racingpost.com/results/21/goodwood/2024-09-03/873889 I can also see that you have been provided with a Free Bet Calculator and here you can calculate these Returns but will need to input the Rule 4 on your first selection. As such your bet has been paid out correctly in line with this. I apologise for any inconvenience caused. You can review our terms and conditions by using the link provided; https://help.bet365.com/product-help/sports/rules/horseracing I hope this helps with your query." CLEARLY they are just using the same explanation of R4 and avoiding the win only change on e/w race
-
harry_rag reacted to a post in a topic: settlement of each way trixie but one of races was reduced to paying win only due to amount of NR's
-
a rather standard textbook response just received: Thank you for contacting bet365 customer services. I have taken a look into the bet XD4383654951I for you Anthony and I can confirm that this bet has been correctly settled and correctly paid out. This is because the selection on Almaty Star includes a Rule 4:45p deduction on it due to Non Runners. I have provided a link below for you so that you can look to calculate this yourself Anthony. https://www.free-bet-calculator.co.uk/ I appreciate that this is not the outcome that you were expecting Anthony and I apologise for any inconvenience caused by this. For a more instant response then you can contact us via Live Chat. You can do this by selecting the 'Help' button at the top of the page and a pop-up window will open. In this window scroll to the bottom of the page and select 'Contact Us' and then select your country and press the 'Open Chat' under the Live Chat section. Thank you for your cooperation and patience. Kind regards,
-
Hi Harry. I genuinely cannot recall but placed bet at 6 night before race and think was a boosted place race with 7 https://www.racingpost.com/results/21/goodwood/2024-09-03/873889 and looks like 3 NRs so 7 runners when placed bet. I have logged in and attached their results which says only one place!