Jenspm Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 Right, a theoretical question this. This evening, I found value in the following two bets; Lille @ 2.10 Lille -1 EH @ 4.33 Using the Kelly criterion, I calculated the stakes for both bets, and both showed an optimal stake of around 2 points. Thus, I put 2pts on both bets. However, later, I came to think - I have, actually, risked 4 points on the premise that Lille will win, twice what the Kelly criterion recomended. Which is the base of my question - is this the right thing to do? Or should I choose the bet with most value? I haven't yet decided - any thoughts on this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.32384c3055cbc1254b0eb6212fda1359.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.