gavham Posted May 22, 2007 Share Posted May 22, 2007 Here is my stats on virgin, i have no idea what i should be reading from these and would value your opinions? Games played 10000 Won /out showdown 79% Games won 24% Won w/out flop seen 47% Flops seen 34% Showdowns won 49% <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> Fold 37% Bet 10% Check 21% Raise 6% Call 22% Re raise 0% Fold before flop 58% Fold on river 2% Fold on flop 7% No fold 28% Fold on turn 3% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavham Posted May 22, 2007 Author Share Posted May 22, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats hmmmm why are they all cramped together, can any you mods sort that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaF Posted May 22, 2007 Share Posted May 22, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats Are these the stats from the software? If so I presume everything is lumped together - cash and tourneys? full ring and short handed .... If so, can't read anything into them at all :unsure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavham Posted May 22, 2007 Author Share Posted May 22, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats Are these the stats from the software? If so I presume everything is lumped together - cash and tourneys? full ring and short handed .... If so, can't read anything into them at all :unsure i am pretty sure this is just sh handed cash games. it says i have never re raised 0% i do this a lot so i think its maybe not working properly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glceud Posted May 22, 2007 Share Posted May 22, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats I think maybe a reraise is a hand were u are the initial raiser then got what we would call reraised but for the stats to call it a reraise u would need to raise again, therfore nearly impossible to do once every 100 actions. I just tried resetting my stats and rerasing every raise and it sill showed 0% reraises so I guess raising a raise is just recorded as a raise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robilaruk Posted May 22, 2007 Share Posted May 22, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats cash games are seperate to tourneys in the stats :ok Damo Are these the stats from the software? If so I presume everything is lumped together - cash and tourneys? full ring and short handed .... If so, can't read anything into them at all :unsure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavham Posted May 23, 2007 Author Share Posted May 23, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats cash games are seperate to tourneys in the stats :ok Damo This being the case, can anyone give me some feedback? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glceud Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats Ok i'l start the ball rolling. I would think the only sat there to worry about is the 49% showdowns won, but as I dont play short handed, high stakes poker I could of course be wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voiceofjoe Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats If I knew your stats before I played you I be thinking. a. Theres little point trying to run a bluff past you, as once your in the hand your not likely to be folding b. Whenever I did have a hand against you I'd be expecting to be paid of handsomely as you seem very reluctant to let go at the river. The stats aren't very comprehensive compared to Poker Tracker, but from the basic figure shown thats what I would be assuming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaF Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats This being the case' date=' can anyone give me some feedback?[/quote'] I don't feel at all qualified to comment ..... and have little experience of short handed play ...... but 37% pre flop folds sounds ridiciulously low to me - you get involved in 63% of hands? Would I be right in assuming that includes, for example, Heads Up stats? (or are you almost always full table (5 handed)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavham Posted May 23, 2007 Author Share Posted May 23, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats I don't feel at all qualified to comment ..... and have little experience of short handed play ...... but 37% pre flop folds sounds ridiciulously low to me - you get involved in 63% of hands? Would I be right in assuming that includes' date=' for example, Heads Up stats? (or are you almost always full table (5 handed)?[/quote'] i very rarely play HU as i dont really like it. its probably so low as you have to be a bit more selective with starting hands at the higher level. i can say one thing about these stats, i dont really understand them but the fact is i have not had one losing day with them and have won a serious amount of cash playing this way. it would be good to analize why this is a winning game thanks for the feedback and keep it coming, as i would like to understand them more. i only play the game you guys seem better qualified than me with the stats so its great to hear the breakdowns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveO Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats Gaf I have to dsiagree with you, 37% fold on a 5 handed table isn't rediculously low, in a full ring game yes. He's in the blinds during 40% of hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 Re: 10,000 Games Stats Still seems low to me, but if it works for you don't change it. Looking at my own stats I saw 20.78% of all flops and only 11.10% of when not on a blind. This is on 9 player tables on Poker Stars. I'm 4 tabling and grinding out a pretty consistant profit with this approach Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.