Systematic's Ratings System/Strategy

[Systematic]

Hi everybody. Been using an idea I had for rating horses in small fields. It is fairly new, only thought of it earlier this year, its a cross between a system and a strategy. Basically I noticed how some horses with certain form lines in small fields kept winning. They had some sort of form in relation to two form pointers. First they were in the first 4 at least once in their last 3 races. Secondly they have shown some ability in at least one of their last three races. Horses meeting these two points are then rated using a method that has nothing to do with form figures, weights, speed figures or any of the usual stuff. All qualifiers get a basic 100 points and then get extra points for achivements in any of their last three races. Next I deduct points according to thier last three races and one point if they are odds on in todays race. This leaves me with the ratings for the horses. I then make a choice from the top two rated horses in the race. Not yet found a consistent way to pick a clear top rated and second top rated when there are joint top rated horses, but I am working on it. Will put the system ratings on here from today and see if anyone can come up with a suggestion or two for splitting those joint top rated horses. Not sure if any of the meetings will be abandoned due to the downpour, but here are the ratings for today. Sunday 26th November Newbury 14:05 Denman 103, Snakebite 100 Leicester 15:00 Novacella 100, Little Venus 99, Lojo 96 Fontwell 13:15 Pablo Du Charmil 100, Penzance 99, Royal Shakespeare 88 Fontwell 13:45 Gods Token 102, Kawagino 100, Dusky Lord 99, Hawadeth 99, Ichi Beau 99, Fait Le Jojo 88 Systematic

[alkarkar]

Re: Systematic's Ratings System/Strategy Good luck Systematic.:ok What do you meen by "they have shown some ability in ..." , how do you calculate ability?