Gotta See This Pls Omg

[lemonjon]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

Uuuuh' date=' be careful with the Smirnoff... and the last word... I do not understand... and my dictionary is in the addic :unsure[/quote'] Dissertation = A BIG FECKEN ESSAY:wall:wall:wall:wall:wall:wall:wall ahh well 2 weeks and its all over :drums

[SpurMan]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

Uuuuh' date=' be careful with the Smirnoff... and the last word... I do not understand... and my dictionary is in the addic :unsure[/quote'] dissertation: noun A lengthy, formal treatise, especially one written by a candidate for the doctoral degree at a university; a thesis. In other words, very very long essay imposed by a university (mine was 130,000 words and that was only an undergraduate one!!. And my God was it hell to write!!!) Good luck with it Lemon!

[lemonjon]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

dissertation: noun A lengthy, formal treatise, especially one written by a candidate for the doctoral degree at a university; a thesis. In other words, very very long essay imposed by a university (mine was 130,000 words and that was only an undergraduate one!!. And my God was it hell to write!!!) Good luck with it Lemon!

Cheers Spurman, I'll be glad when its done, my heads fecken mashed (well more than normal):rollin

[jeffers]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg I know this kind of thing is HIGHLY unlikely, but even so, it's still possible - infact more possibly than many other things that will happen in poker...guesswest said it's probably never happened in the history of poker - I guess it has more than once. :loon

[Masterplan]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg if the above aituation did occur it would most probably be the most unlikely event that has ever happened short of the big bang. considering that except for the queens it could ONLY occur with those starting hands so you can start off with: 1/52*1/51*1/50*1/49*1/48*1/47*1/46*2/45 ish (i'm not great at math or probabilities if i'm wrong i'm wrong) then the board cards 1/44*1/43*1/42*1/41*2/40 then add in personal probabilities like the chance of the 8/9 calling whatever raises had come previously, possibly none if slow played so you might choose to ignore it. anyone got a calc to do it? i work it out as 15/3954242643911239680000

[jeffers]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg The so called probabilities don't matter mate - it's still possible. If you take into account the number of hands dealt online, even with the odds you quote - it's possible that it would happen in our lives.

[Masterplan]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg probability of winning the lottery is roughly 1/14500000 probability of winning the lottery twice 1/(14500000)^2 = 1/210250000000000 probability of winning the lottery 3 times 1/(14500000)^3 = 1/3048625000000000000000 = 3.2801672x10^-22 15/3954242643911239680000 = 3.7933939x10^-21 so, this is slightly more likely to happen than a sinlg e person winning the lottery 3 times in their life, but not by much until someone wins twice, i'm sticking this one in the> will never happen in the history of the human species

[jeffers]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

probability of winning the lottery is roughly 1/14500000 probability of winning the lottery twice 1/(14500000)^2 = 1/210250000000000 probability of winning the lottery 3 times 1/(14500000)^3 = 1/3048625000000000000000 = 3.2801672x10^-22 15/3954242643911239680000 = 3.7933939x10^-21 so, this is slightly more likely to happen than a sinlg e person winning the lottery 3 times in their life, but not by much until someone wins twice, i'm sticking this one in the> will never happen in the history of the human species

It's still possible. :\

[AJ]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg law of large numbers suggests that unlikely events will occur, given enough time

[slapdash]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg Think your numbers are a bit big, Masterplan. The probability of "this" happening depends on exactly what you mean by "this". For: * QJ10 suited on the board * one of those paired on the board * the other board card is a nine or lower * one hand has the royal flush * one hand has the 8-Q straight flush * one hand has quads * one hand has high full house, I make the probability a little under one in 60,000,000,000 on a 10-player table. I don't know if anybody has a good estimate of how many hands of Holdem have been played in the history of poker, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was in the region of 60,000,000,000.

[F1man]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

if the above aituation did occur it would most probably be the most unlikely event that has ever happened short of the big bang. considering that except for the queens it could ONLY occur with those starting hands so you can start off with: 1/52*1/51*1/50*1/49*1/48*1/47*1/46*2/45 ish (i'm not great at math or probabilities if i'm wrong i'm wrong) then the board cards 1/44*1/43*1/42*1/41*2/40 then add in personal probabilities like the chance of the 8/9 calling whatever raises had come previously, possibly none if slow played so you might choose to ignore it. anyone got a calc to do it? i work it out as 15/3954242643911239680000

I think you have gone way over on your calc. First of all, when dealt the cards, it does not matter which person gets dealt which cards, or in what order. The prob you have calculated in for a person to be dealt the cards in that order. Therefore to get the same kind of result in screen shot, there are plenty more ways to do it. (I could have done the calc one day) The second part of the calc goes wrong, as the cards can be dealt in any order. For ex, the chance of the first card on the flop being dealt which matches the cards on the table is infact 6/44, then 5/44 and so on. (Although a bit more complicated as the two on one card makes it a bit tricky). In short this is one mother of a calc. But remeber every hand you play ie everyone get dealt 2 random cards, and then the cards are in the middle played, as as much chance of happening as this one on this thread.

[Masterplan]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg i think its slightly more tha 60bn to 1, because if you have a king or ace of a suit for example in a purely heads up situation. its 8 in 52, but then to have that matching partner is then 1 in 51. which if you then consider the 8/9 musdt be the same suit, you now have 2 in 50 then 1 in 49, then you have the QJT of that suit coming down, 3/48, 2/47, 1/46 with 1 per board card chance of it being chosen. i remember vaguely from years ago when i did statistics it should be something like 45 permute 5 * 45 permute 2 * 45 permute 1. or something like that. remember that 8 9 T J Q K A all of the same suit have to be selected from the deck in specific orders in order to be dealt. this alone is probably more than 60bn to 1

[slapdash]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg There are 5040 ways of choosing which of the 10 players gets the royal flush, which gets the other straight flush, etc. Have you taken that into account? Let's do this carefully: There are 52*51*50*49*48/5*4*3*2*1 = 2598960 possible boards. To get QJ10 suited, there are 4 possible suits. To get one of those cards paired, there are 9 possibilities. To get another card, nine or lower, say, but not the 8 or 9 of the QJ10 suit, there are 30 possibilities. So there are 4*9*30=1080 boards that will work. So the probability of getting a good board is one in 2598960/1080 = 2406.44444... Now look at how likely it is that particular players get the royal, etc.: Given the board, there are 47*46/2=1081 hands, only one gives the royal, so there's a 1 in 1081 chance of player A getting this. Given the board and first hand, there are 45*44/2=990 possible second hands, so there's a 1 in 990 chance of player B getting the straight flush. Given the board and first two hands, there are 43*42/2=903 possible third hands, so there's a 1 in 903 chance of player C getting quads. Given the board and first three hands, there are 41*40/2=820 possible hands for player D. There are 6 ways for him to get a high full house, giving a 1 in 136.66666 chance. In total that gives a 1 in 2406.44444 * 1081 * 990 * 903 * 136.66666 = 317824286579800 chance. But there are 10*9*8*7 =5040 ways to pick players A,B,C,D, giving a total chance of 1 in 317824286579800/5040 = 63060374321.3888.

[Penelopeys]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg He he... Let me introduce Slapdash... The PL Master Brain :clap :clap

[rednutt]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

There are 5040 ways of choosing which of the 10 players gets the royal flush, which gets the other straight flush, etc. Have you taken that into account? Let's do this carefully: There are 52*51*50*49*48/5*4*3*2*1 = 2598960 possible boards. To get QJ10 suited, there are 4 possible suits. To get one of those cards paired, there are 9 possibilities. To get another card, nine or lower, say, but not the 8 or 9 of the QJ10 suit, there are 30 possibilities. So there are 4*9*30=1080 boards that will work. So the probability of getting a good board is one in 2598960/1080 = 2406.44444... Now look at how likely it is that particular players get the royal, etc.: Given the board, there are 47*46/2=1081 hands, only one gives the royal, so there's a 1 in 1081 chance of player A getting this. Given the board and first hand, there are 45*44/2=990 possible second hands, so there's a 1 in 990 chance of player B getting the straight flush. Given the board and first two hands, there are 43*42/2=903 possible third hands, so there's a 1 in 903 chance of player C getting quads. Given the board and first three hands, there are 41*40/2=820 possible hands for player D. There are 6 ways for him to get a high full house, giving a 1 in 136.66666 chance. In total that gives a 1 in 2406.44444 * 1081 * 990 * 903 * 136.66666 = 317824286579800 chance. But there are 10*9*8*7 =5040 ways to pick players A,B,C,D, giving a total chance of 1 in 317824286579800/5040 = 63060374321.3888.

:eek :unsure :\

[jeffers]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

There are 5040 ways of choosing which of the 10 players gets the royal flush, which gets the other straight flush, etc. Have you taken that into account? Let's do this carefully: There are 52*51*50*49*48/5*4*3*2*1 = 2598960 possible boards. To get QJ10 suited, there are 4 possible suits. To get one of those cards paired, there are 9 possibilities. To get another card, nine or lower, say, but not the 8 or 9 of the QJ10 suit, there are 30 possibilities. So there are 4*9*30=1080 boards that will work. So the probability of getting a good board is one in 2598960/1080 = 2406.44444... Now look at how likely it is that particular players get the royal, etc.: Given the board, there are 47*46/2=1081 hands, only one gives the royal, so there's a 1 in 1081 chance of player A getting this. Given the board and first hand, there are 45*44/2=990 possible second hands, so there's a 1 in 990 chance of player B getting the straight flush. Given the board and first two hands, there are 43*42/2=903 possible third hands, so there's a 1 in 903 chance of player C getting quads. Given the board and first three hands, there are 41*40/2=820 possible hands for player D. There are 6 ways for him to get a high full house, giving a 1 in 136.66666 chance. In total that gives a 1 in 2406.44444 * 1081 * 990 * 903 * 136.66666 = 317824286579800 chance. But there are 10*9*8*7 =5040 ways to pick players A,B,C,D, giving a total chance of 1 in 317824286579800/5040 = 63060374321.3888.

I think we'll take your word for it. :unsure

[slapdash]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg I'll have to remember this for future reference. Just put a few big numbers in a post, and they'll all stop arguing!

[Penelopeys]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

I'll have to remember this for future reference. Just put a few big numbers in a post, and they'll all stop arguing!

:rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin

[guesswest]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg Party, who account for 70% of the market, and used to account for more, have dealt 4.2 billion hands since they started. So I'd guesstimate 6 billion hands dealt online total. That'd make it 1 in 10. But also a huge proportion of hands will have been dealt on heads up and six seater tables and in other kinds of poker games. Even ignoring all that though, certainly much more likely than not that this hand has never happened.

[lemonjon]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg I can see what ur all saying, but if we multiple the interflux generator gore readings by 12 and deduct the gamma ray particle inducer then clearly the answer is: warp 6

[slapdash]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

I can see what ur all saying, but if we multiple the interflux generator gore readings by 12 and deduct the gamma ray particle inducer then clearly the answer is: warp 6

I was hoping nobody would spot that. :unsure

[Masterplan]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

I can see what ur all saying, but if we multiple the interflux generator gore readings by 12 and deduct the gamma ray particle inducer then clearly the answer is: warp 6

i thought the answer was 42?

[lemonjon]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg Well masterplan, the answer would have been 42 had I wrote core instead of gore, this little detail was enough to transcube the particle switch which makes the answer warp 6 :ok

[moFace]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg i like cheese :D

[Penelopeys]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

i like cheese :D

:rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin That made my sunday :clap :clap :clap

[Valiant23]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg :lol@moface!:clap

Well masterplan' date=' the answer would have been 42 had I wrote core instead of gore, this little detail was enough to transcube the particle switch which makes the answer warp [b']6 :ok

But when you times that by 9 you get 42. Obvious really..

[slapdash]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg

But when you times that by 9 you get 42.

Hmm, I can see I have a long way to go here before my work is done.

[lemonjon]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg but if u had 4 and 2 together u get 14, divide that by the number of gamma data particles in a triangle and u get warp 9.8765432098764567738902, this gets rounded to the nearest hyper point which is 6 she cannnnnnie take much more of this captain

[Penelopeys]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg And... 3 + 3 is 6....

[lemonjon]

Re: Gotta See This Pls Omg r u sure can u prove it:ok