jaywyte

To cut a long story short, I blew big money on football today so in chasing the money I went big on over 34.5 games as needed money back quick, relief that I didn't choose Murray but Murray stormed the first set, I had already broken down to girlfriend thinking id blown a large amount of our money to buy a house . Its caused bog problems and she's making me block all gambling sites. As it turned out, the over 34.5 games bet which i staked a whopping 16 thousand on came in, I won all my money back, and maybe needn't have told her but I think that's it for me and gambling, I simply cannot help being reckless with it.
 

Back L.Pouille/G.Monfils - Over 36.5 games at 1.90 with BetVictor
As much as I respect Monfils for keeping a perfect record here, I think that the line should be slightly higher here considering how resilient Pouille has been. There's always the risk of people self-destructing after a big win and I'm often trying to cash in when these situations arise, but the Frenchman is mature and he won by outplaying Nadal regularly, not by playing some incredible ball-bashing and getting luck. He might not be your idea of a fabulous player, but he's playing like a top 10 player at the moment and he should take Monfils close, even though I'd expect him to run out of fuel if this goes to the decider. I mean come on - this guy has already outplayed Bautista-Agut and Nadal here, he's not going to self-destruct mentally against Monfils, especially since he didn't self-destruct against him in last year's Australian Open (where they played a five-setter).

Have to agree with earlier posts on Czech, I know very little about Tennis and generally pop into site for the odd football thoughts. I caught a few posts from Czech last year which I had a little tipple on, and from then on alway's have a look on Tennis forum to see what Czech has previewed on the tennis. One of the top dogs on this site, and a huge asset to all forumites who view the site.

Thanks for the kind words guys The above bet was a loser indeed, however.