Jump to content

teaulc

New Members
  • Posts

    14,508
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by teaulc

  1. Re: PLWSOP - Attendee's list - Important - 3 SEATS LEFT, PLEASE VOTE IF COMING!

    3 seats left? is there a limit? Might play in Omaha only if weather dodgy. Too tight to pay for taxi but might bring car - is there plenty parking? Do you pay on arrival or phone casino?
    its capped at 50, but alternates after this for 2 levels i believe,, only 2 seats left now. you pay on entry :ok
  2. Re: Daily Scheduled MTT Winnings November 2010 $20 12cb_d68_u92am.jpg PokerStars Tournament #341010493, No Limit Hold'em Buy-In: $10.00/$1.00 USD 6022 players Total Prize Pool: $60220.00 USD Tournament started 2010/11/24 19:00:00 WET [2010/11/24 14:00:00 ET] Dear teaulc, You finished the tournament in 534th place. A USD 18.06 award has been credited to your Real Money account. You earned 67.52 tournament leader points in this tournament. For information about our tournament leader board, see our web site at http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/tournaments/leader-board/ Congratulations! Thank you for participating.

  3. HA poker is a game that mixes both pot limit hold’em and pot limit Omaha. The game changes back and forth between hold’em and Omaha every set amount of time or after a set number of hands. For example, the play may switch back and forth between hold’em and Omaha every 15 minutes. In order to be a successful HA player you have to be a good pot limit hold’em player, as well as a solid pot limit Omaha player. A player that can mix proficiency in both of these game types will be a winning HA poker player. This is one of the most popular mixed poker games played online. The first game in HA Poker is pot limit hold’em. This is almost the same as no limit hold’em except that the maximum bet allowed is equal to the amount that is currently in the pot. Because you are only allowed to bet the size of the pot, there are some slight strategy changes when moving from no limit to pot limit hold’em. The main difference is in drawing hands. In no limit hold’em you will probably want to keep the pot small when you are on a draw and try to make it a bigger pot once you make your hand. In pot limit hold’em you cannot do this because if the pot is small when you make your hand on the river, you are only able to bet the pot which may make for a relatively small pot even though you made a strong hand. Therefore, in pot limit hold’em you should bet out when you have a strong draw. This way if you do make the hand you will have a greater chance to win a much larger pot. Other than this pot limit hold’em plays very similar to no limit hold’em, without that massive bets and all-in bets preflop. The second game in HA poker is pot limit Omaha high. In Omaha you are dealt 4 down cards and must use two of them with the 5 community cards to make a 5 card poker hand. A main difference between hold’em and Omaha is that in Omaha it is more common to make stronger hands such as straights and flushes because you have 2 extra hole cards that you can use to make your hand. For this reason you should not feel that your hands are good, just because they would likely be good in hold’em. For example, if you make a flush in Omaha and there is a pair on the board this doesn’t necessarily mean you have the best hand. Often times a player will have made a full house and if you value your flush too high, this could end up costing you a lot chips. Omaha is much more of a drawing game than hold’em. There are often times when you will have not even made a pair but still be the favourite on the turn if you have a flush draw and a couple of different straight draws. A good starting hand would have a lot of connectors and a couple pairs of suited cards. In order to be successful playing HA poker you have to be able to switch back and forth between hold’em and Omaha easily. This means you can’t get caught up in your hold’em frame of mind and start thinking your hand is good in Omaha when you actually have a weak hand

  4. The final installment of a three-part article. After all the talk of where A-Q stacks up according to the numbers, we can now make decisions on how to play it. The Middle Hand As explained in other articles, it never makes sense to bet the middle hand. This is an example of that sort of scenario. A-Q is a high-middle in the world of playable hands, but it's still in the middle nonetheless. Players new to poker are quick to pick up that A-Q is a top 5% hand, and feel that that number alone should make it a profitable play. But without the necessary skill, experience and ability to read other players, playing A-Q in early position - or for very new beginners, even playing A-Qo at all - can be a losing play. Players such as Daniel Negreanu have openly talked about A-Q losing them money long-term and being a trouble hand. But that doesn't mean they won't play it. Being a top 5% hand, it is statistically profitable, but only if you can dump it when you run into the lose-money scenarios. How to Play A-Q I started writing this article to try and hammer out some good ideas and guidelines on how to play the hand. Unfortunately, I don't think it's possible to explain in print. From everything I've explained in this article, it becomes clear that to play A-Q profitably, it's a purely situational hand. You have to play it differently, or not at all, depending on the table you're on and the players you're with. If you're up against nine players who will only play top-five hands, A-Q is a losing hand. If you're up against players who will play any two cards, the numbers will back up A-Q to make you money. How you play A-Q on Titan Poker may be completely different to how you would play A-Q on Pokerstars. No matter how you play it, you need to be making information plays. You need some way to get a solid read on what you're up against. It's better to lose two bets pre-flop, or on the flop, than to lose eight bets across five streets. Early Position In my first year of poker I quickly noticed A-Q as being a trouble hand for me, and began to experiment with different ways of playing it. One of the ways I experimented was to limp-reraise A-Q from early position. If your No. 1 goal is to gain information about the other hands, this can be a great way to do it at a low-medium limit No-Limit table. With the amount of strength shown by a limp reraise, you can be sure the other player has a hand that dominates you if they call or come back over the top. In these scenarios you lose three bets, compared to losing one where you miss or a stack when you hit a setup flop. One thing to remember with this play, and any information play, is the motives you had for making the play in the first place. If the person does call you after making the limp reraise, you have to sign right off and be willing to dump the hand no matter what the flop (other than flopping broadway). Even flopping top two in this scenario will put you at risk of losing your stack against two of the top-five hands, winning nearly nothing against KK and winning small to a stack against A-K. Remember, with the strength you showed pre-flop, A-K will be less likely to pay you out on an A-Q-2 board. Chances of you having AA or QQ are very real, making it a hard call for them to make. Making this move is only a good idea against ABC players. ABC players will react to this move exactly in line with the strength of the hand they're holding. If you attempt this move against tricky players, you can put yourself into poor spots. For example, if you make this move against a player known to raise, bet, call and three-bet light, you will gain no information going to the flop. You have now built a statistically very large pre-flop heads up pot, with no information in the hand. This makes post-flop decisions very difficult. Against such a player, if you think hitting your ace or queen is good, the size of the pot will dictate how much it will sting if you're wrong. Late Position As in all other aspects of poker, the single most important factor next to the strength of your hand is playing your position. In late position, I would advocate raising an unopened pot with A-Q almost every time. It is a top 5% hand, and if no one is showing strength, it is most likely best. If you are behind a raiser, it has to be a read-based play. Against anyone resembling a tight player, it wouldn't be a mistake to muck the hand. Even if the raiser is a nutbar, you have to remember that even nutbars get dealt monster hands, and they will be raising those just like all the rest. Playing A-Q in a raised pot is a purely read-based scenario. If you're at a table where you are outmatched, A-Q is better left in the muck, than in your hand. Even though I would advocate limp-reraising with A-Q in certain situations, I would rarely, if ever, encourage reraising from late position with it. Your reraise is going to force everyone else in the hand to fold to the original raiser, isolating them and you. Good players here can smooth-call virtually any hand to either set a trap, set up a bluff, or try to crack you. You won't gain enough information from a good player in this scenario to make it a valuable play. I don't like to have to count on luck to make my hand profitable. Smooth-calling a raise is obviously a poor option. You have no information on the hand by making this move, and are putting yourself into the exact scenarios I listed earlier. Those ended as -EV. I feel that A-Q is better mucked behind a raise without having a serious read on the other players at the table. If you're able to read them blind, then having A-Q is irrelevant, as your cards no longer matter. Afterthoughts A-Q is by far the biggest trouble hand in poker. For this reason alone, unless you have a good reason, and a good spot to play it, it's best left mucked. I would be interested to get your feedback on this article, and your thoughts on A-Q. If you have any comments to make, questions or whatnot, post comments on this page. by Sean Lind

  5. Devilfish Gaming plc, the firm behind virtual poker room Devilfish.com, has signed an agreement to sell its Devilfish Poker Limited online gambling subsidiary to an unnamed party for £330,000. The operator, co-founded by professional poker player David ‘Devilfish’ Ulliott, revealed that the deal will see it receive £40,000 in cash and the balance in an issue of new ordinary shares in an acquiring company that will be traded on the London Stock Exchange’s Alternative Investment Market. “The sale has not yet been completed and is subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence and legal process,” read a statement from Altrincham-based Devilfish Gaming. “A further announcement with more detail will be made once the sale has been completed.” In a separate announcement, Devilfish Gaming has also revealed that David Boden has resigned as its Chairman with immediate effect. “The Board wishes to thank David for his contribution to the company during his period of tenure,” read a statement from Devilfish Gaming.

×
×
  • Create New...