Jump to content
** March Poker League Result : =1st Bridscott, =1st Like2Fish, 3rd avongirl **
** Cheltenham Tipster Competition Result : 1st Old codger, 2nd sirspread, 3rd Bathtime For Rupert **

Seven Golden Rules


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 297
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Re: Seven Golden Rules

no selections today
Hi mate Just thought I'd let you know that slight variation on your system had 2 selections and both won. Not a boast at all because without your solid base there would be no variation. Kerb Appeal & Kallistro I think off the top of my head (I'm at work with no info to hand). Like I said, the ROI I managed to get was closer to 20% than 10% with these little changes. You might want to bear it in mind is all. There has not been 1 day yet with no selections and today things are pretty similar.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Seven Golden Rules

Hi mate Just thought I'd let you know that slight variation on your system had 2 selections and both won. Not a boast at all because without your solid base there would be no variation. Kerb Appeal & Kallistro I think off the top of my head (I'm at work with no info to hand). Like I said, the ROI I managed to get was closer to 20% than 10% with these little changes. You might want to bear it in mind is all. There has not been 1 day yet with no selections and today things are pretty similar.
What is different about yours then gooner? This is still looking very promising Dannkez, keep it up.:)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Seven Golden Rules It was this if you remember: Exclude 20+ runners Exclude Firm going (I guess are horses aren't used to it in this wet country haha!) Exclude odds of under 2/1 No fallers in last 3 3+ career runs Ran 3+ days ago Exclude horses that have run 7+ times in last 90 days Jockey must have ridden 50+ rides in last 12 months. Kept it at last run 19 days max as moving it out to 25 took a big chunk of yield. Plus, the above doesn't care how many times they have won, just that they won lto. OTHER THAN THAT ALL YOUR ORIGINAL RULES STAY THE SAME. Very similar selections but a couple of different horses here and there. You were concerned at lack of betting opportunities but there has been at least 1 selection almost every day and usually 2 or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Seven Golden Rules messing about with those criteria dropped my selections from 2670 to 1554 at one point but took the yield from 111.4 to 117.6 but as you can see more than a thousand less selections. be interested in anyones opinion of more selections/smaller yield v less selections/higher yield. i think with a constant rate of selections coming through you can work a staking plan more effectively to rise faster but thats just me, what does anyone else think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Seven Golden Rules

messing about with those criteria dropped my selections from 2670 to 1554 at one point but took the yield from 111.4 to 117.6 but as you can see more than a thousand less selections. be interested in anyones opinion of more selections/smaller yield v less selections/higher yield. i think with a constant rate of selections coming through you can work a staking plan more effectively to rise faster but thats just me, what does anyone else think?
I still have around 3000 selections so not quite sure what you're doing:unsure
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Seven Golden Rules

any chance you can do a screenshot of your criteria?
I'll have a look later tonight or tomorrow as I'm out early. It doesn't actually list the criteria though does it. Just shows a page of results and then separates all the different sections depending on what you put in. Don't think all this can be put on 1 screenshot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Seven Golden Rules sorry raz i dont think i quite understand your question, of course its of use. the idea is to be able to alter the criteria and keep the selections as high as possible and also maintain the return high. i am running with 2500 selections at 111% at the moment but currently i can get it as high as 121% with 1900 selections, so the question is do i revert to the extended criteria?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Seven Golden Rules

Well I mean you can take out courses where you have a low return and it is really cheating. As this is simply making the results look better. Do you have 111% at SP or on betfair estimate?
You also have to look at it logically as opposed to just taking out the lower percentages. There might not be any logical reason for a track to have performed bad. In that case it would be a mere statistical anomaly. Like I mentioned before 2004, going into 2005 seems completely at odds with the next 4/5 years. Was there a reason for it or did things just not go according to the way they had done historically?! March seems a rubbish month in what I've posted before but unless anybody can show me a reason why, I won't put much stock in it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Seven Golden Rules If you aimed for 1% increase of bank per winner and did a little (I can't believe I am about to say this) of the m-word that involves mathematically chasing loses. £20 becomes: After 100 wins £40 After 200 wins £80 After 300 wins £160 After 400 wins £320 After 500 wins £640 After 600 wins £1,280 After 700 wins £2,560 After 800 wins £5,120 After 900 wins £10,320 After 1000 wins £20,640 After 1100 wins £41,280 After 1200 wins £82,560 And would be even quicker if you aimed for this per bet made rather than per winner. I think this system might just be ideal, especially with no odds on...... wonder what the longest losing run would have been?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Seven Golden Rules I'll just butt in for a second while you discuss staking plans. By now every man and his dog will have read the maria laying thread where she used a ratchet. Altering stake percentage for expected s/r from historical data, this can be used in backing as well. I've used it recently on both the NFL season and MW football sheets to great effect. The plus being that wins build your bank a damn site quicker than level staking or even % staking which goes up and down. Providing you calculate a safe level before you start then your bank should never be in too much jeopardy from the expected losing runs as you would never be staking enough that you could lose the bank from the off. All you're doing in effect is starting a new bank for each set of bets. As a further safety net you can set an amount in your mind where if it becomes lost you readjust the bank accordingly. Say a loss of 30% from bank high point for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Seven Golden Rules mate you took the words right outta my mouth. the maria staking plan is perfect for this although i like fleets idea to. i use a form of the maria on my footy system and its working well. think it works better on systems that show a consistent strike rate like this one has done. so ill bear it in mind til im ready to set it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...