billy the punter Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Re: Hugh Taylor "Lets get ready to Rumble" In the Blue corner, we have Casey "The Flat King" Jones In the Red Corner, we have Billy "The Sizzlin" Punter Now i want a good clean tipping comp, no low punches, no over timing and you must go to a natural corner on my say so. Let's Get It On Speak to my agent. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trendsman Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 Re: Hugh Taylor This guy has recommended a 2pts e/w @ 25/1 this morning on Doric Lady which just won at 14/1 :clap:clap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
circuss Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 Re: Hugh Taylor Reality is not about knowledge but about empowerment. All the knowledge will not afford its [own specific] empowerment unless it is realised. A successful tipster who does not realised overall profits means only one thing, which is that he's only there for himself, not others, regardless of how the situation was arrived at. We are not talking about apportioning blame nor responsibility, we are talking about efficacy. Taking down a sparrow with a cannon shot might be glitzy but it's not efficient should the exercise be about the best bang for the buck. ATR's strategy might be great for them and Mr HT but it does nothing for their followers who are there for profit. It doesn't matter how the odds were changed, what mattered is, will it make money at the end of the overall profitability map. The knowledge which lacked empowerment means you won't be able to handle the knowledge and the power which lacked knowledge means you won’t be able to handle the power. Regardless of the rationality, HT's tips are not profitable in essence. Seeing the woods from the trees comes to mind. In life, we can't do anything for others unless and until we had done the same for ourself first. Without a single exception. In HT's case, he's there only for himself, not others. The duty of a saviour is to gather worshippers and little else. He's not there to save anybody other than his vested interest/s, oka Fame, Fortune & Immortality. Lying might be seemed different from not telling the truth but in essence, they are both one and the same - except for the timing - because of the nuances within the matter under consideration. That's what a virus teaches, aviod but not evade, and should you pull through, your immune system gets a little stronger. Without a single exception. Due to the nuances, HT's tips are only for show, not for empowerment/profit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBoyRooney Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 Re: Hugh Taylor circus ya forgot to put "in my opinion"..:cash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuleBritannia Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 Re: Hugh Taylor Reality is not about knowledge but about empowerment. All the knowledge will not afford its [own specific] empowerment unless it is realised. A successful tipster who does not realised overall profits means only one thing' date= which is that he's only there for himself, not others, regardless of how the situation was arrived at. We are not talking about apportioning blame nor responsibility, we are talking about efficacy. Taking down a sparrow with a cannon shot might be glitzy but it's not efficient should the exercise be about the best bang for the buck. ATR's strategy might be great for them and Mr HT but it does nothing for their followers who are there for profit. It doesn't matter how the odds were changed, what mattered is, will it make money at the end of the overall profitability map. The knowledge which lacked empowerment means you won't be able to handle the knowledge and the power which lacked knowledge means you won’t be able to handle the power. Regardless of the rationality, HT's tips are not profitable in essence. Seeing the woods from the trees comes to mind. In life, we can't do anything for others unless and until we had done the same for ourself first. Without a single exception. In HT's case, he's there only for himself, not others. The duty of a saviour is to gather worshippers and little else. He's not there to save anybody other than his vested interest/s, oka Fame, Fortune & Immortality. Lying might be seemed different from not telling the truth but in essence, they are both one and the same - except for the timing - because of the nuances within the matter under consideration. That's what a virus teaches, aviod but not evade, and should you pull through, your immune system gets a little stronger. Without a single exception. Due to the nuances, HT's tips are only for show, not for empowerment/profit. Have quoted this in bigger text, for us hard of sight. :ok Welcome to PL mate, stick around :ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingertipster Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 Re: Hugh Taylor Reality is not about knowledge but about empowerment. All the knowledge will not afford its [own specific] empowerment unless it is realised. A successful tipster who does not realised overall profits means only one thing' date= which is that he's only there for himself, not others, regardless of how the situation was arrived at. We are not talking about apportioning blame nor responsibility, we are talking about efficacy. Taking down a sparrow with a cannon shot might be glitzy but it's not efficient should the exercise be about the best bang for the buck. ATR's strategy might be great for them and Mr HT but it does nothing for their followers who are there for profit. It doesn't matter how the odds were changed, what mattered is, will it make money at the end of the overall profitability map. The knowledge which lacked empowerment means you won't be able to handle the knowledge and the power which lacked knowledge means you won’t be able to handle the power. Regardless of the rationality, HT's tips are not profitable in essence. Seeing the woods from the trees comes to mind. In life, we can't do anything for others unless and until we had done the same for ourself first. Without a single exception. In HT's case, he's there only for himself, not others. The duty of a saviour is to gather worshippers and little else. He's not there to save anybody other than his vested interest/s, oka Fame, Fortune & Immortality. Lying might be seemed different from not telling the truth but in essence, they are both one and the same - except for the timing - because of the nuances within the matter under consideration. That's what a virus teaches, aviod but not evade, and should you pull through, your immune system gets a little stronger. Without a single exception. Due to the nuances, HT's tips are only for show, not for empowerment/profit. Absolute rubbish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
circuss Posted March 20, 2010 Share Posted March 20, 2010 Re: Hugh Taylor A welcome, be it chilly or warm, is a welcome. Whilst horse racng analyses might not be the forte, human behaviour analyses is. There is none so blind as he who will not see - even the physically blinded could see that one coming. There is none so revealing as he whose cup is always full - the know-it-all merely being the know-nuffing at some other moment, timing/latency being the true essence, not time. Why is it that when the word, "Idiot", is offered, all the idiots stake their claim [with the same going for anything behaviourially human] ? Because we all know-it-all, whether we pretend to be humble or otherwise. Still but, butting …? Hint: Otherwise, nobody will argue or delcare for anything. When was the last time anyone declared that he wipes his bottom after a bog session? Not when it is a reality. Gambling, oka statistics, is the science of improbabilty made tangible/real through "democratising". Within a sample of 100 given a viable task to perform, 2-5 will always come out trumps, regardless, leaving 8-15, making some sense but only through dedication/determination. As for the rest, some will just about manage to stay above the waterline with others sinking, declaring that it is not viable/achievable with the majority not bothering even to do anything. When it comes to marketing, those golden few will always be used to showcase the potency of the marketed, tempered with "testimonials". When was the last time anyone breathed for another. Really? No one breathes for another. Knowledge is not the point, empowerment is. When was night called possibily day and vice-versa? When you do not have absolute-reality/tangibility. That's why the Hallelujah Crowd and The Scientific Crowd are always on the marketing prowl, collectively known as Fame, Fortune & Immortality, oka The Golden Goose. Those lacking [absolute] reality might be sharing something/"charitable" but is is just one or even two facets of his Golden Goose - but never all three. Why so? Because that IS his Golden Goose. The love which expects is not Love but merely vested interest/s. As Shakespeare hinted, "There are more things on heaven and earth … than are dreamt of in your phiplosphy ..", and Shakespeare is not about some airy-fairy "acedemia of a nuance" but about Plays Of Life. Within Reality [as opposed to "Relativity"], we cannot be taught, we have to learn and those who will not learn, will be taught a lesson by the myriad of relativities within Relativity, oka "The Affairs Of/Between Men". Without the capacity to make mistakes, we won't have the capacity to learn and those who are afraid of [making] errors, like, say, the contemporary nonsense of, "Work, Health & Safety", will be weakened slowly but steadily. Without viruses, the immune system will not "grow". To learn, we must favour/imbibe the quality of witnessing instead of reacting. Thereafter, gamblers, marketeers, crooks, pimps, and even politicians, are mere entertainments - much like the joker at court. Gamblihng is about chasing rainbows - all know that but only a very few are able to "do the correct thing" at one's moment of addiction whilst not forgetting that "addiction" is just a word for not being able to say "no" at one's moment of damage/destruction. Addiction is the result of not learning from one's mistakes - the pet pastime of blind-cum-blinded. The boundary dividing control and abandonment is the point, not the latter two alteregos/different-faces-of-the-same-coin. Neer assume anything or else they'll see you coming - everytime. Without exception. Now, are these "tips" worthy of a lifelong safe-keeping or only good for a gamble … Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuleBritannia Posted March 20, 2010 Share Posted March 20, 2010 Re: Hugh Taylor A welcome, be it chilly or warm, is a welcome. Whilst horse racng analyses might not be the forte, human behaviour analyses is. There is none so blind as he who will not see - even the physically blinded could see that one coming. There is none so revealing as he whose cup is always full - the know-it-all merely being the know-nuffing at some other moment, timing/latency being the true essence, not time. Why is it that when the word, "Idiot", is offered, all the idiots stake their claim [with the same going for anything behaviourially human] ? Because we all know-it-all, whether we pretend to be humble or otherwise. Still but, butting …? Hint: Otherwise, nobody will argue or delcare for anything. When was the last time anyone declared that he wipes his bottom after a bog session? Not when it is a reality. Gambling, oka statistics, is the science of improbabilty made tangible/real through "democratising". Within a sample of 100 given a viable task to perform, 2-5 will always come out trumps, regardless, leaving 8-15, making some sense but only through dedication/determination. As for the rest, some will just about manage to stay above the waterline with others sinking, declaring that it is not viable/achievable with the majority not bothering even to do anything. When it comes to marketing, those golden few will always be used to showcase the potency of the marketed, tempered with "testimonials". When was the last time anyone breathed for another. Really? No one breathes for another. Knowledge is not the point, empowerment is. When was night called possibily day and vice-versa? When you do not have absolute-reality/tangibility. That's why the Hallelujah Crowd and The Scientific Crowd are always on the marketing prowl, collectively known as Fame, Fortune & Immortality, oka The Golden Goose. Those lacking [absolute] reality might be sharing something/"charitable" but is is just one or even two facets of his Golden Goose - but never all three. Why so? Because that IS his Golden Goose. The love which expects is not Love but merely vested interest/s. As Shakespeare hinted, "There are more things on heaven and earth … than are dreamt of in your phiplosphy ..", and Shakespeare is not about some airy-fairy "acedemia of a nuance" but about Plays Of Life. Within Reality [as opposed to "Relativity"], we cannot be taught, we have to learn and those who will not learn, will be taught a lesson by the myriad of relativities within Relativity, oka "The Affairs Of/Between Men". Without the capacity to make mistakes, we won't have the capacity to learn and those who are afraid of [making] errors, like, say, the contemporary nonsense of, "Work, Health & Safety", will be weakened slowly but steadily. Without viruses, the immune system will not "grow". To learn, we must favour/imbibe the quality of witnessing instead of reacting. Thereafter, gamblers, marketeers, crooks, pimps, and even politicians, are mere entertainments - much like the joker at court. Gamblihng is about chasing rainbows - all know that but only a very few are able to "do the correct thing" at one's moment of addiction whilst not forgetting that "addiction" is just a word for not being able to say "no" at one's moment of damage/destruction. Addiction is the result of not learning from one's mistakes - the pet pastime of blind-cum-blinded. The boundary dividing control and abandonment is the point, not the latter two alteregos/different-faces-of-the-same-coin. Neer assume anything or else they'll see you coming - everytime. Without exception. Now, are these "tips" worthy of a lifelong safe-keeping or only good for a gamble … As above, quoting so I can read it, more than anything. :ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingertipster Posted March 20, 2010 Share Posted March 20, 2010 Re: Hugh Taylor I pity you Circuss, you seem to see the worst in everyone. You seem to be against gambling full stop. So why you should be on a gambling website is a little strange. Hugh Taylor's results are there for all ton see. He's a genuine bloke. If gambling is so bad, surely being in buisness is a gamble? It's an investment that can go well or badly. A punter's job is to be well informed so he can make a good decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroalan Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Re: Hugh Taylor i note he,s been in blinding form this week,but the bookies are now taking the piss,two he put up today at 33/1 16/1 are now 8/1 7/1 value is soon evaperated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris34 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Re: Hugh Taylor Yeah he went through a dry spell and bookies stopped reacting probably as some of his avid fans got concerned now he has come back into form the bookies are worried and also his followers will have their money down! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.