Jump to content
Announcements
** April Poker League Result : 1st Rhino_Power, 2nd muttley, =3rd Elliott Sutcliffe & Rav **
** Football Tipster Competition Result : 1st Soi Bongkot, 2nd Power900, 3rd Gazza's United, 4th Trotter, 5th Rainbow **
** April Naps Competition Result: 1st PercyP, 2nd daisychain, 3rd Costello, 4th silver fox. KO Cup Winner Kingdom for. Most Winners bymatrix: **

The pyramid : Session 1 ©️


Joloupa
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello 
I'm going to show you one of my ways of playing. I named my method "Pyramid".  

The pyramid is composed of 20 parts , each one composed of 4 levels.

My bank is 400 units.
I divide my bank into 20 parts, so each part is worth 20 units. 

Then I play all in starting at level 1, then level 2 ….. then 4. 

If I lose on a level, I start again with 20 units on the next part.

If I win all 4 levels, I start the next game with 20 units.

I play an average odds of @1.45

Session 1 will be finished at the end of the 20 parts. 

To be a beneficiary, I have to win 5 parts. 

For session 2, I divide my bank again into 20 parts to determine my stake in level 1. 

To win, you have to be very serious in your choice of bet. 

See you soon 

 

 

                              Session 1  (400u)

part 1.(20u)     Part 2.(20u)        Part 3.(20u)        . . . . . . . Part 20.(20u)

 

level 1                    level 1                 level 1                                     level 1

level 2                    level 2                level 2                                     level 2

level 3                    level 3                level 3                                     level 3

 level 4                   level 4                level 4                                     level 4

Edited by Joloupa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Joloupa changed the title to The pyramid : Session 1 ©️

Good luck with this. Be nice if you could track the returns to level stakes. My gut feel is it's an unnecessarily elaborate approach to staking that basically requires you to string together 4 consecutive winners often enough to show a profit. In the long run, it should be profitable if the selections are good enough. In the short term it's down to luck (you could have picked enough winners to show a level stakes profit but lose because they didn't fall in your favour or win despite not showing a level stakes profit because the winners were grouped together nicely).

To manage our fevered expectations can you give us a rough idea of how frequent the selections might be? e.g. daily, 1 a week, 1 a month?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, harry_rag said:

Good luck with this. Be nice if you could track the returns to level stakes. My gut feel is it's an unnecessarily elaborate approach to staking that basically requires you to string together 4 consecutive winners often enough to show a profit. In the long run, it should be profitable if the selections are good enough. In the short term it's down to luck (you could have picked enough winners to show a level stakes profit but lose because they didn't fall in your favour or win despite not showing a level stakes profit because the winners were grouped together nicely).

To manage our fevered expectations can you give us a rough idea of how frequent the selections might be? e.g. daily, 1 a week, 1 a month?

Hi 

I can bet 2-3 times a day if the events are interesting. 

On average I think about 8-10 bets a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, glennhughes said:

Am I missing something ? What was the bet ?

Bet on Brecel v Hamilton ??? 

 

I nearly made the same point, it could’ve been clearer. One point @Joloupa please don’t edit the posts containing the selections, it’s against the rules for this part of the forum because it can look as if amendments have been made after the event. I appreciate that’s not the case here but you should quote the original post if you need to make any corrections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, harry_rag said:

nearly made the same point, it could’ve been clearer. One point @Joloupa please don’t edit the posts containing the selections, it’s against the rules for this part of the forum because it can look as if amendments have been made after the event. I appreciate that’s not the case here but you should quote the original post if you need to make any corrections.


 

No problem 

I will be clearer in my posts 

Thanks for the explanations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...