Jump to content
** March Poker League Result : =1st Bridscott, =1st Like2Fish, 3rd avongirl **
** Cheltenham Tipster Competition Result : 1st Old codger, 2nd sirspread, 3rd Bathtime For Rupert **

Pricing your own race


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Villa Chris said:

What I’m struggling with at the moment is which horses to pick out the ratings. Do you just bite the bullet and go with top rated providing they are backable odds of say at least 5/2, 3/1. Do you go with the best value bet providing they are top 3-4 rated, or big races paying 6 places do you add 5th and 6th rated into the equation. I think there needs to be some judgement as well regarding picking your selections. Think we highlighted Roaring Bull yesterday as a horse who was highly rated but me and Richard both lacked the confidence to back him. For Cheltenham it might pay to go with top rated and also pick two value bets providing there is value in the top rated horses. My top rated horses have been running well , so happy to go with that, but it’s what’s underneath them, that I’m struggling with . If you have two 22/1 shots in top 4, what do you do. Play them both ew and play top rated, I suppose. Going on a bit now, but  just thought I’d get it out there. 

I think if you have big priced horses in your top 3 then they are worth playing  ...you have seen numerous times that they can win or go close .....generally I go with the best hcapped horses....so if my top rated was 5/1 +3 ....and my 2nd rated was 10/1 +1 ....I'd go ew on the 2nd rated just because it's not being asked to do much more than it's done before.....I also use highest value place last 3 runs as a final bonus point .....so if top rated was placed in 20000 last time .....and the 2nd rated was placed 3rd in a 46000 I'd favour the latter for certain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Catterick 2.15

Whos In The Box 8.2, 4/1(5/1)2nd 

Ask Paddy 7, 8/1(13/2)3rd 

Ibis Du Rheu 6.2, 7/1(7/1)fell 

Justforjames 6.2, 22/1(7/1)5th 

Decent little race with 8 runners. 3 horses share 3rd best rated, but I really think Who’s In The Box is a strong top rated and will stay the trip with doubts about some of the others. 

Edited by Villa Chris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

355 Kemp 

Pink jazz 9.1 11/2 9/1 good value 

Brunel charm 8.7 6/1 4/1 no value 

Rogue tide  7.8 7/1 11/1 good value 

Mabre 7.3 15/2 4/1 no value 

Interesting race because a lot of these horses are better at certain courses ....mabre is well fancied today and shoukd run a big race ...likewise brunel charm  but today I'll play the value bets on bet365 ...can get 13/2 pink jazz 5places ....and 8/1 rogue tide 5 places ew .....so that's still value prices and gotta be worth a play on a quiet day 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking forward I dont make a course adjustment usually .....i do for all weather i.e newcastle and wolv are transferable but not to ling and kemp and chelm so adjustment is made .....but for cheltenham I definately need to do one I think .....I'm thinking I might do it as a 1.5 pt bonus for a placed chelt horse and 2pt for a win .....its a huge factor that horses without experience just dont do well ....that's a fact no matter what form they are coming in with .....how are others managing that ???...and what importance do you put on it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, richard-westwood said:

355 Kemp 

Pink jazz 9.1 11/2 9/1 good value 

Brunel charm 8.7 6/1 4/1 no value 

Rogue tide  7.8 7/1 11/1 good value 

Mabre 7.3 15/2 4/1 no value 

Interesting race because a lot of these horses are better at certain courses ....mabre is well fancied today and shoukd run a big race ...likewise brunel charm  but today I'll play the value bets on bet365 ...can get 13/2 pink jazz 5places ....and 8/1 rogue tide 5 places ew .....so that's still value prices and gotta be worth a play on a quiet day 

Similar rating for value ones.

Screenshot_20210216-070005~2.png

Edited by Wildgarden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, richard-westwood said:

Looking forward I dont make a course adjustment usually .....i do for all weather i.e newcastle and wolv are transferable but not to ling and kemp and chelm so adjustment is made .....but for cheltenham I definately need to do one I think .....I'm thinking I might do it as a 1.5 pt bonus for a placed chelt horse and 2pt for a win .....its a huge factor that horses without experience just dont do well ....that's a fact no matter what form they are coming in with .....how are others managing that ???...and what importance do you put on it ?

I do course adjustment for low draw or high draw depending on the course and the affect on the horse. Would be good to do front runners as bonus points perhaps too on some circuits and negative for back peddlers. Had mixed results since added draw component. Sometimes I'm getting the forecast and on the money but sometimes I'm getting nothing since this addition lol will post bit more when cleared underlying issues

Edited by Wildgarden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, richard-westwood said:

Looking forward I dont make a course adjustment usually .....i do for all weather i.e newcastle and wolv are transferable but not to ling and kemp and chelm so adjustment is made .....but for cheltenham I definately need to do one I think .....I'm thinking I might do it as a 1.5 pt bonus for a placed chelt horse and 2pt for a win .....its a huge factor that horses without experience just dont do well ....that's a fact no matter what form they are coming in with .....how are others managing that ???...and what importance do you put on it ?

I allocate a 5% allocation to horses who have won at the course. It works out half a point(0.5)  if they have won , 0.3 if they placed , and 0.1 if they have ran  there. I find it rightfully gives horses a score, but not too much of a score where there’s too much emphasis on course winners. I’m happy with it . I might increase the % to 10% for Cheltenham but I’m not sure yet , as I think things are working ok at the moment . I find majority of the class horses will run well at Cheltenham, although some horses will just not be able to operate fully there. 
 

Another thing , I think in the handicaps you’ve got to take into account some trends, and one trend could be that no horse racing off 148(for example) has ever won the race, which obviously means it’s carrying too much weight. I’ll be keeping my eye on that one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to think about with turf is how to allow more percentage consideration when the ground is soft or heavy compared to weight. A heavier horse will struggle more in these conditions than good or to good to firm unless it's a specialist in this going? May end up having separate system just for the different types of going?

Edited by Wildgarden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Wildgarden said:

One thing to think about with turf is how to allow more percentage consideration when the ground is soft or heavy compared to weight. A heavier horse will struggle more in these conditions than good or to good to firm unless it's a specialist in this going? May end up having separate system just for the different types of going?

Never thought of that but you are right. Unless they do their best running on heavy a top weight horse will be vulnerable . What I do find is I do my ratings night before and it’s soft going, but then the following day it can change, like today for example where it’s now heavy. Luckily it hasn’t affected the ratings much and top rated are still top rated . Don’t have time in week to do them on the day so it’s a night before job. Weekend is different mind .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive already got trends for all races at chelt and I use them now for big races ....once I've got my top 5 or 6 rated ...running trends can instantly narrow to 2 in a flash....I.e in some races 9 yr olds plus have never won ....in other races like you say horses over 11st 4lbs have never won ...some people dont agree but if you need help narrowing your final selections it's a fantastic tool especially at Cheltenham 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, richard-westwood said:

I think if you have big priced horses in your top 3 then they are worth playing  ...you have seen numerous times that they can win or go close .....generally I go with the best hcapped horses....so if my top rated was 5/1 +3 ....and my 2nd rated was 10/1 +1 ....I'd go ew on the 2nd rated just because it's not being asked to do much more than it's done before.....I also use highest value place last 3 runs as a final bonus point .....so if top rated was placed in 20000 last time .....and the 2nd rated was placed 3rd in a 46000 I'd favour the latter for certain

I agree. I tend to use my ratings in conjunction with other factors. I.E if a tipster I follow tips a horse I rate the race to see how the selection looks, then maybe I'll increase or decrease my bet. I also check the top 3 rated using my old selection criteria and see if they 'stack up'. If they do then it's a bet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kempton 15.55

Rogue Tide       16.77     7/1             10/1   Value

Pink Jazz          14.45     8.25/1         9/1    Some value

Mabre               13.96     9/1              4/1     No Value

Aureum             13.85    9/1               3/1     No value

Malvern             12.92    9.75/1         20/1     Value

Tommy Rock     12.56    10/1            11/1    About right

Brunel Charm    12.49    10/1            7/2     No value

The bet is Pink Jazz ew for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Villa Chris said:

Catterick 2.15

Whos In The Box 8.2, 4/1(5/1)2nd 

Ask Paddy 7, 8/1(13/2)3rd 

Ibis Du Rheu 6.2, 7/1(7/1)fell 

Justforjames 6.2, 22/1(7/1)5th 

Decent little race with 8 runners. 3 horses share 3rd best rated, but I really think Who’s In The Box is a strong top rated and will stay the trip with doubts about some of the others. 

 

19 hours ago, Villa Chris said:

Catterick 2.45

Maskada 8.15, 2/1(6/1)2nd 

llaya 7.6, 22/1(13/2) non runner 

The Some Dance Kid 7.5, 25/1(13/2)3rd 

8 runner race. Top rated looks classy but 2 and 3 offer great value . 

Both races  fell apart , especially Bottom  with non runners so the third rated who was 25/1 and came third, I’d take that with a pinch of salt . Happy with the first race regarding ratings but lost money on the day .

Edited by Villa Chris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Pirate53 said:

Kempton 15.55

Rogue Tide       16.77     7/1             10/1   Value

Pink Jazz          14.45     8.25/1         9/1    Some value

Mabre               13.96     9/1              4/1     No Value

Aureum             13.85    9/1               3/1     No value

Malvern             12.92    9.75/1         20/1     Value

Tommy Rock     12.56    10/1            11/1    About right

Brunel Charm    12.49    10/1            7/2     No value

The bet is Pink Jazz ew for me.

Top rated 3rd, 4th rated 2nd. Muddling race. Tommy Rock drifted to big value, but who would have bet on it with a drift like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, richard-westwood said:

355 Kemp 

Pink jazz 9.1 11/2 9/1 good value 

Brunel charm 8.7 6/1 4/1 no value 

Rogue tide  7.8 7/1 11/1 good value 

Mabre 7.3 15/2 4/1 no value 

Interesting race because a lot of these horses are better at certain courses ....mabre is well fancied today and shoukd run a big race ...likewise brunel charm  but today I'll play the value bets on bet365 ...can get 13/2 pink jazz 5places ....and 8/1 rogue tide 5 places ew .....so that's still value prices and gotta be worth a play on a quiet day 

Rogue tide 3rd  ..good run for value bet .......no run from pink jazz he was a bit disappointing but that's racing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

205 weth weds 

Marracudja  9.7 7/1 9/2 no value 

Charmant 9.5  7/1 20/1 excellent value

Chozen 9.0 15/2 33/1 excellent value (inflated ??)

Commission de office 7.6 10/1 13/2 ,no value 

Unbrigado 7.6  10/1 3/1 no value 

Chozen is carrying bottom weight but has been off for nearly a year so could be a good value bet but may need a run so risky .....charmant looks a very good value bet ...way overpriced at 20/1  imo ....most likely winner majjacudja ....top 2 for me ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wetherby 2.05

Charmant 8.25, 16/1(8/1)

The Paddy Pie 7.95, 14/1(17/2)

Marracudja 7.95, 4/1(17/2)

Hollywoodien 7.95, 8/1(17/2)

Destined To Shine 7.7, 13/2(8/1)

Swift Crusador 7.5, 16/1(9/1)

Charmant looks a cracking bet. 2nd, 3rd and 4th equal rating . Top 5/6 rated who are close to each other . Bottom rated is 6.7 so all have a chance going off ratings .

Edited by Villa Chris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Wildgarden said:

One thing to think about with turf is how to allow more percentage consideration when the ground is soft or heavy compared to weight. A heavier horse will struggle more in these conditions than good or to good to firm unless it's a specialist in this going? May end up having separate system just for the different types of going?

This sounds logical but might not be true because on heavy going the horses run slower

and it's easier to carry more weight if you run slower ...... think about trying to sprint carrying a suitcase versus ambling along carrying the same suitcase

I reckon anything that slows the field down makes it easier for the top weighted horses in handicaps ...... heavy ground or a tight turning track would be two examples

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...