10 minutes corner market

[Tsakiris7]

Good evening to all. I would like to share a strategy and would like to know if you have worked it out and your views on that strategy. In a game where there is a high chance of several corners, we choose to take a corner in the next ten minutes with a 1.50 odds if not verified then play the next ten times playing the original 3 times. I know it's a big risk but for so many years in fast paced games I haven't seen a corner for 30 to 40 minutes. I would like your opinion on this strategy or some change in it.

Edited December 27, 2019 by Tsakiris7
Scrolling problem

[harry_rag]

If you re-post so it can be read without having to scroll all the way across in a single line then I'll have a read and let you know if I have any thoughts.

As it is, for whatever reason, you've posted in a way that is likely to deter most people from reading what you've got to say.

[harry_rag]

7 hours ago, Tsakiris7 said:

Good evening to all. I would like to share a strategy and would like to know if you have worked it out and your views on that strategy. In a game where there is a high chance of several corners I get the essence of what this might mean but you'd need more specific criteria to use it in a strategy, e.g. games where the spreads price corners at 11.5 or more.

we choose to take a corner in the next ten minutes with a 1.50 odds I assume this means we bet on a corner being taken by either team in the next 10 minutes at odds of 1.5. I have no idea of whether or not those odds are likely to be value in a typical game.

if not verified then play the next ten times playing the original 3 times. The bit I'm struggling with most. Do you mean if that bet loses we bet on it happening in the next ten minutes at 3 times our previous stakes? I can't see any value in that, it just seems like a random loss recovery attempt.

I know it's a big risk but for so many years in fast paced games I haven't seen a corner for 30 to 40 minutes. I would like your opinion on this strategy or some change in it. If I've understood it right I can't see any reason why it should be a profitable strategy in the long run, unless we have reason to believe we can identify games where 1.5 is too big a price for a corner in the next 10 minutes. If that was the case I can't see any reason to think this would be the optimum approach to staking. Why not think more in terms of a strategy of backing a corner in the next 10 minutes where there have been x minutes (e.g. 20, 30 etc.) without a corner, if you think the length of time without a corner is significant.

Thanks for making the post easier to read. Unfortunately, now I can read it I'm still struggling to understand it! I've broken it down above and added some comments or queries. To be honest, it's not really an aspect of corner betting I've ever really looked at so I probably can't add anything of any real value. The aspects I sometimes think might be worth a second look in terms of value being had are the most corners and first corner market but it's well down my list for closer scrutiny.