Jump to content
** March Poker League Result : =1st Bridscott, =1st Like2Fish, 3rd avongirl **
** Cheltenham Tipster Competition Result : 1st Old codger, 2nd sirspread, 3rd Bathtime For Rupert **

Narrowing Down The Field Trial


Recommended Posts

Ok, so as you know I produce ratings on every race, every day and although it's been pretty successful its very difficult to cover all of the selections. The other day there was 9 meetings and 67 races! 
We had something like 14 winners but thats also a lot of losers, so how can we narrow down the selections?

I have a theory so i'm going to trial it and see how it goes, I wouldn't recommend anyone follow this just yet.

My personal outlook when trying to pick a winner comes in three simple stages.

1) Horse has to be in good current form coming into the race.
2) Horse has to have the ability/potential to achieve a certain standard for that race.
3) Horse must be consistent enough to think it can produce that standard.

In ratings terms we translate that as follows.

Each horse has a rating for its last 5 outings.
A) Current Form: Must have the highest rating of the field last time out.
B) Potential: Must have the highest individual rating of the field overall in its last 5 runs.
C) Reliability: Must have highest accumulative total over last 5 runs. (at least 10pts clear of next top rated)

Due to needing a reliability factor this will count out the majority of Maiden races due to lack of form to work on. 

Staking
The stakes will be fairly simple, 1pt if a horse is 10pts clear, 2pts if a horse is 20pts clear and so on.

*On average we only get a handful of horses more than say 40pts clear, these are often maiden races where not all of the runners have had enough starts.
I'm not sure how many qualifiers this will throw up, maybe some days a couple and other days none?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/9/2017 at 0:22 PM, BillyHills said:

Ok, so as you know I produce ratings on every race, every day and although it's been pretty successful its very difficult to cover all of the selections. The other day there was 9 meetings and 67 races! 
We had something like 14 winners but thats also a lot of losers, so how can we narrow down the selections?

I have a theory so i'm going to trial it and see how it goes, I wouldn't recommend anyone follow this just yet.

My personal outlook when trying to pick a winner comes in three simple stages.

1) Horse has to be in good current form coming into the race.
2) Horse has to have the ability/potential to achieve a certain standard for that race.
3) Horse must be consistent enough to think it can produce that standard.

In ratings terms we translate that as follows.

Each horse has a rating for its last 5 outings.
A) Current Form: Must have the highest rating of the field last time out.
B) Potential: Must have the highest individual rating of the field overall in its last 5 runs.
C) Reliability: Must have highest accumulative total over last 5 runs. (at least 10pts clear of next top rated)

Due to needing a reliability factor this will count out the majority of Maiden races due to lack of form to work on. 

Staking
The stakes will be fairly simple, 1pt if a horse is 10pts clear, 2pts if a horse is 20pts clear and so on.

*On average we only get a handful of horses more than say 40pts clear, these are often maiden races where not all of the runners have had enough starts.
I'm not sure how many qualifiers this will throw up, maybe some days a couple and other days none?

 

I agree with your selection criteria 1,2,3 but as you mention in another post - 2yo races are producing poor results
I do my own ratings but I don't bother with 2yo races any more because I found that any 2yo could make a sudden improvement without any signs that this was about to happen and completely screw up the form book. I find the same with 3y olds in the early part of the season - I need them to have a couple or three races before I'm happy to trust their rating, most of my bets are with older horses with a fair bit of form.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...