GETT1NLOTS
-
Posts
4,417 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by GETT1NLOTS
-
-
Re: Int'l Friendly : Poland v Italy (Wed 12th Nov) I wouldn't touch this game either. The Italians do not care much for friendly games (either the players or fans) and any result is possible here. On the plus side if you really MUST back Italy - I believe they are actually a better side without Totti - so his absence will do the Italians a favour. Come to think of it he is a 'big time charlie' even in games that matter - so in a friendly his appearance would have been a massive negative for the Italians. Anyway - this has turned into a bit of a ramble :o - I still wouldn't back Italy (Totti issues aside).
-
Re: '3 and yer OUT.' Yes martingdale is as you describe. I was just drawing a comparison in so much that it works on the same principle. Keep backing until someone wins / loses. Working on the assumption that a certain streak cant go on forever. Which of course it can (until you are broke at least!) :eek Anyway like I say - best of luck.
-
Re: '3 and yer OUT.' Man Utd went 11 games on the trot winning didn't they (last season) - something like that anyway. Best of luck though Raven. This does have an odour of Martindale about it though doesn't it? :rolleyes
-
Re: HOLLAND I always wondered how Advocaat (Avacado - or however you spell it) got thae job in charge of Holland? I mean he wasn't exactly brilliant at Rangers in a two horse race was he?
-
Re: week 9 standings Bowles An extremely interesting system. The suggestion before from another poster to concentrate on the lower leagues where a gulf in class isn't so obvious might be the way to go? I shall watch your system with interest. Thanks for sharing.
-
HOLLAND I heard on Sky Sports news today that Advocaat has said he will not play Ruud Van Nistelroy and Patrik Kluivert together again? Have they had a bust up or something? This could be great news for the Scots. Advocaat was saying he would pick PK - not Horse Head. I only caught the back end of this report - anyone enlighten me or have I got this all wrong?
-
Re: 0-0 is a NO VALUE BET. Well go into William Hills - Get a Midweek Live Coupon and you will! ;)
-
Re: 0-0 is a NO VALUE BET. 0-0 and no goal scorer is NOT the same price at Hills sometimes. For example N.Forest Vs Rotherham was 7-1 for 0-0 against Rotherham on Tuesday night. No goalscorer was 9-1. :eek Check it out. ;)
-
Not exactly a system or strategy as such. Just noticed something today that most of you will have known for a while but I have only just realised. :o :o If this is any help to anyone else then I'm happy. 0-0 odds in correct score betting is normally 6/1 - 7/1 However if you bet on 'no goalscorer' in a game you get 9/1 generally. Plus with some bookies own goals don't count so even if the game ends 1-0 with an own goal you still win! (I hope I'm not the last to realise this?) :o :o
-
1.49 Value? Dunno Hodgey + Matt??? Turkey looked poor against England. Latvia beat Sweden away (albeit in a game that didn't mean much to the Swedes). 1.49 on this double looks dodgy value to me boys...
-
Re: qlpol Hi qlpol, Thanks for having the good nature and humour to answer anyway mate. Yeah I agree, Holland are not the team they once were and with their continual internal politics, then of course Scotland might just do it. I hate to admit it (seeing as those 'Jocks' give us English so much stick) but I would love to see them do it to be honest!
-
qlpol Hi qlpol. I found your statement interesting
I would like £10,000 on Holland at even money to go through then please. Can you confirm you have the requisite funds? I would like to place a bet with you at those odds please. ;)I give Scotland 50% -
Re: Euro 2004 play-offs Wales have an outside chance. Scotland have to hope that the typical Dutch arguments start and that the whole first team for Holland doesn't show. Failing that - they're fcucked IMO.
-
Re: england v turkey CJ :o :o :o Normally I am not that bad - Honestly!! It's just that the Turks really got under my nose prior to last night AND during the game with their antics.
-
Re: INTERNATIONAL FRIENDLIES I'll be going to the game today at the Walker Stadium. How some of you are going to lump on Brazil at 1.2 amazes me? With respect chaps - have you learnt nothing??? NEVER, EVER, EVER, BET ON INTERNATIONAL FRIENDLIES. Brazil have a very poor record lately (or is my memory playing tricks with me?) in matches that don't matter. I remember them playing a decent selection against China and drawing 0-0. Brazil might well win (I hope they score 8 - I want some action!) - but I would never bet on it.
-
Re: Well done lads Sorry about my rant last night fellahs - I was smashed :o :o Thought I would just post here on Eriksons commentsa after the game. He seems to be quite clear that he is staying until next summer as long as the FA want him. He even said it was annoying to have to keep repeating himself on this point! You know I have been thinking as well. Granted we have played some very average teams lately but only 1 LOSS in all competative matches under Erikson??? And that was to Brazil in the quarter finals of the World Cup, in the mid day heat that suited them. And Brazil went on to win it. Not bad eh?
-
Republic Sorry to see you guys go out. :| Hate to admit it but my heart always out-rules my head and I cheer you guys on. You're a good team - without Mcarthy Vs Keane I think you would have gone through.
-
Re: We're on our way.. Guys - what a night! The only reason why this post is reasonably lucid is because I have read it ten times. I am pissed as a cnut. England, England, England. Fcuk Sukur - you dirty diving twat. Fcuk their goalie - you dirty (should have been sent off) cnut. You were going to do what against us? You were going to win by how many? Sorry, how crap is our first team? WE'RE THROUGH - YOU ARE NOT!!!!!! Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, Who are ya, GOD I AM PISSED AND HAPPY. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Sorry Mods.
-
Re: The One and Only secret to being a Profitable Punter Bookie Buster I assume that you are a professional punter then? I am not meaning to sound curt but if you follow your argument to the ultimate conclusion - and value is the only consideration - and varying the stake is not important (which is what you are suggesting) then you must: - a) Keep a consistent stake? b) Turn a consistent profit because you can read value better than the Bookie? If this is true, I assume you punt professionally? Why work when you have the guarantee of success?
-
Re: The One and Only secret to being a Profitable Punter Yeah I have to agree with the last comment from Punter. Part of considering value (or using that value) is down to the stakes / staking strategy that you use. Punters example above fits perfectly.
-
Re: Turkey Ksportz. He should be banned IMO. He has to be for the integrity of dope testing. Otherwise forget dope testing at all. Serious drugs stay in the system for a LONG time so the fact that he took the test 32 hours later and PASSED should dramatically reduce the time period of the ban though, as the likelyhood is that in all but protocol he is innocent.
-
Re: Turkey v England I think some value might enter this game now that Rio is not allowed to play. Whilst it is a great shame (and it pissed me off actually) that the idiot has got himself banned - I think it might spark off a better value bet? On the exchanges (in particular) I expect to see England drift slightly in price... Give the fact that Rio hasn't been at his VERY best this year and that we have some decent defenders in reserve I believe that the value might well be on England still winning the group. Opinions on this?
-
Re: The Outsiders Mr I, I take it your staking plan is based on what you consider to be 'best value'? (i.e the better the percieved value the bigger the stake?). Good Luck BTW.
-
Re: Turkey v England Swampster, Your last post seems to me to suggest the most sensible approach to betting on this game. (If you have to bet that is!) Very low stakes on some big odds as you have highlighted. Big stakes on a game like this - which could go any way - would be very foolhardy IMO.
Oh dear - Gravesens coming to kick our ass...
in Other International Predictions
Posted
Re: Viking-invasion - England v. Gravesen England have a poor record in friendlies under Erikkson. Da Han' - we would - of course beat Denmark easily if the game mattered though. :smokin A classic 'no bet' friendly IMO.