Announcements
** September Nap's Competition Result: 1st Boulder5111, 2nd Craig Bluenose, 3rd Barnsley Chop, 4th Zilzalian KO Cup: Bathtime For Rupert, Most Winners: Waggy**
**September Poker League Result : 1st Kevsul £75, 2nd Gemic £45, 3rd Barry John £30**

Rob

New Members
  • Content Count

    483
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Re: 'Strategies' If you're talking about backing each outcome so that you're guaranteed a return, then you're basically talking about arbitrage. There are websites dedicated to this but opportunities are very hard to come by
  2. Re: 'Strategies' Welcome ginger bear, There's a few questions in there and I'm not sure that they can all be answered in one go. I've always believed that unless you're betting at particularly low or high odds then your staking method is largely irrelevant i.e. whether you are using spread bets or accumulators or singles, they are just different versions of the same bets -so a bad bet in a Yankee is still a bad bet in singles. The key is always to find value bets, where your estimate of the odds is better than the odds on offer. Simple really, if you crack that bit, let me know!
  3. Re: Wolves v Man City - April 22nd Lost my nerve and bailed out with a small profit, layed off at 2.9
  4. Re: Wolves v Man City - April 22nd I'm inclined to agree with this, although will take the 3.1 available with Betfair with the option to trade out at H/T depending how the game is looking. City have nothing to gain from busting a gut to hammer Wolves, it's all about getting 3 points on a rainy away day and getting back to Manchester for the big game. Wolves only objective today will be to not get absolutley tonked. This could end up 0-7, but it could just as easiliy finish 0-1. Worth a small interest on the under 2.5 I think 4 pts @ 3.1
  5. Re: KMAbet's Betting Exchange Strategy Interchange Really KMAbet? again? ok I'll bite, you seem to have posted half a system without the important element of actually making it work? A system that looks remarkably similar to the last one you posted (oops we're not allowed to talk about that are we). Can we conclude from this that you were a tad premature with your previous 'holy grail' claims?
  6. Re: Progressive staking - very selective system Out if interest, why the progressive staking instead of level stakes? Never understood why people use this
  7. Re: High risk,High reward Laying system -Thoughts please. I think your long term prospects are pretty poor on the evidence you've given. You lay horses at 5/1, is that it?
  8. Re: newbie,first {football}system If the system is already profitable then why are you using a mathematically flawed staking plan? If Man Utd and Chelsea were good value every week then the washed up guys you see in betting shops every week would be millionaires, and the bookies would be broke. you could run this for 10 years without making a loss, but that doesn't mean the martingale system is working, it just means you've been lucky and at any time you could get wiped out by a bad run of games. Be honest with yourself and think about how the martingale staking plan could possibly
  9. Re: PitMaster - Asian Handicap Startegy - 2007 Hardly, you spelt the title wrong ;) only kidding mate, good luck with this
  10. Re: World footballer of the year When I clicked on this thread I expected to see Cannavaro at about 1/4! I thought it was generally accepted that he was nailed on for this? If these odds are still available I might have a small interest in this
  11. Re: Can I change my name? Don't suppose the user name 'Rob' is available is it? I feel like a bit of a dick being named after an ageing brazillian centre back who was only at wednesday for a couple of seasons
  12. Re: Lay the crappy New Manager markets 1.36 :( my 3.95 lay isn't looking very healthy now
  13. Re: Lay the crappy New Manager markets You're right Ned, the price has gone out to 3.95 so it looks like i've missed the boat a bit. Still layed him, but I should have been bolder eary on